Comments on: The 8 top gay videos of 2008

By: Louisddog

Louisddog — Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:19:22 +0000

I agree with Buchanan that the basic purpose of marriage is for creating the next generation. That’s why I think we should ban non-fertile people and those past reproductive age from the privilege of marrying. Also, in order to protect the sanctity of marriage, divorce should be outlawed…

By: Avntr99

Avntr99 — Thu, 01 Jan 2009 13:49:09 +0000

I nominate that Rick and Steve puppet TV show in SF as #9. Technically it lasted for 30 min, but it was still video. It was great!

By: Theo, (from literate) San Francisco CA

Theo, (from literate) San Francisco CA — Thu, 01 Jan 2009 07:45:25 +0000

People say there’s nothing in the Constitution anywhere about Gay Marriage, to which I say, there was nothing about marriage being between “one man and one woman” either, (otherwise, why would there have been a call to add the words on Nov 4. 2008?) Now, if Prop 8 truly is to be taken literally & enacted as Kenneth Starr claims he would have it, this very same “clear” amendment verbiage would not only unfairly nullify 18,000 legal gay marriages; it necessarily nullifies (with equal “clarity”) the validity of any & all prior/future straight divorces, too (Prop 8 “clearly” stops short of explaining “one man & one woman ‘at one time’”.) Hence anyone’s 2nd, 3rd, 4th…etc. marriages would likewise be voided by way of Prop 8’s very same “simplicity”: the wording of Prop 8 implies that one man/woman couple’s 1st marriage supersedes, voiding recognition of any subsequent marriage(s) or divorce settlements. Straight or Gay, Prop 8 can’t/won’t be applied equally, thus it MUST be stricken.

By: Rene

Rene — Sun, 28 Dec 2008 19:52:42 +0000

Being a Gay White Latino male and having a 12yr relationship. I found Jon Stewart’s interview with Governer Mike Huckawhananotbee so amazingly satisfying, bias free, emotionlly moving that I now have the upmost respect to Mr. Stewart. Job Well Done Sir. Love Ya!

By: TANK

TANK — Sun, 28 Dec 2008 06:41:42 +0000

Olberman’s not an idiot. That’s silly. He’s a very successful pundit. He’s too sentimental for my taste, but oh well; at least he’s a liberal.

By: kevin

kevin — Sun, 28 Dec 2008 04:25:50 +0000

“To the ?person who thinks Keith Olberman is an idiot….. Millions of listeners think otherwise. BTW way, what is YOUR contribution to society? What is YOUR annual income?”

Of course, your argument applies even more so to Rush Limbaugh Since his income is much higher than Olbermann’s, your logic says Limbaugh is even more correct (and has a greater societal contribution) than Olbermann.

By: zacky

zacky — Fri, 26 Dec 2008 07:16:01 +0000

hm ….

By: Allen Gordon

Allen Gordon — Thu, 25 Dec 2008 19:23:39 +0000

To the ?person who thinks Keith Olberman is an idiot….. Millions of listeners think otherwise. BTW way, what is YOUR contribution to society? What is YOUR annual income?

By: Rodney Moore

Rodney Moore — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 20:12:59 +0000

Indeed joleen indeed.

Keith Olbermann is one of the few on network television who gets it. One of the few indeed.

By: joleen

joleen — Wed, 24 Dec 2008 18:56:29 +0000

olbermann made me cry. Nothing is more poignant or ever has been from a straight man. When we say, “they just don’t get us,” he does. Give the man his due.