November 21st, 2009
 

365 Gay: News

GOP downplays Palin book ban flap


(Wasilla, Alaska) The McCain campaign is defending Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin’s much-criticized inquiry into banning books at her hometown library, saying her questions were only hypothetical.

Shortly after taking office in 1996 as mayor of Wasilla, a city of about 7,000 people, Palin asked the city’s head librarian about banning books. Later, the librarian was notified by Palin that she was being fired, although Palin backed off under pressure.

Palin alleged attempt at book-banning has been a matter of intense interest since Republican presidential nominee John McCain named her as his running mate last month.

Taylor Griffin, a spokesman for the McCain campaign, said Thursday that Palin asked the head librarian, Mary Ellen Emmons, on three occasions how she would react to attempts at banning books. He said the questions, in the fall of 1996, were hypothetical and entirely appropriate. He said a patron had asked the library to remove a title the year before and the mayor wanted to understand how such disputes were handled.

Records on the city’s Web site, however, do not show any books were challenged in Wasilla in the 10 years before Palin took office.

Palin notified Emmons she would be fired in January 1997 because the mayor didn’t feel she had the librarian’s “full support.” Emmons was reinstated the next day after public outcry, according to newspaper reports at the time.

The Rev. Howard Bess, a liberal Christian preacher in the nearby town of Palmer, said the church Palin and her family attended until 2002, the Wasilla Assembly of God, was pushing to remove his book from local bookstores.

Emmons told him that year that several copies of “Pastor I Am Gay” had disappeared from the library shelves, Bess said.

“Sarah brought pressure on the library about things she didn’t like,” Bess said. “To believe that my book was not targeted in this is a joke.”

One longtime library staffer recalls that the run-in made everyone fear for their jobs.

“Mayor Palin gave us some terrible moments and some rather gut-wrenching moments, particularly when Mary Ellen said she was going to have to leave,” said Cathy Petrie, who managed the children’s collection at the time.

Recent outrage has been fueled by Wasilla housewife Anne Kilkenny, whose 2,400-word critique of Palin’s legacy as mayor is widely posted on the Internet. Kilkenny described Palin’s actions as “out-and-out censorship.”

But the McCain campaign, in a statement, said the charge “is categorically false … Governor Sarah Palin has never asked anyone to ban a book, period.”

Emmons, a former Alaska Library Association president who now goes by Mary Ellen Baker, did not return calls seeking comment.

According to the Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman newspaper, Emmons did not mince words when Palin asked her “how I would deal with her saying a book can’t be in the library” on Oct. 28, 1996, in a week when the mayor had asked department heads for letters of resignation.

“She asked me if I would object to censorship, and I replied ‘Yup’,” Emmons told a reporter. “And I told her it would not be just me. This was a constitutional question, and the American Civil Liberties Union would get involved, too.”

Other locals said the dust-up had been blown out of proportion.

“That was many years ago and Sarah never had any intention to ban books,” said David Chappel, who served as Palin’s deputy mayor for three years. “There were some vocal people in the minority, and it looks like they’re still out there.”

Jim Rettig, who heads the American Library Association based in Richmond, Va., suggested that lingering quarrel raises issues that are still relevant as librarians prepare to celebrate Banned Books Week later this month.

“Librarians are very committed to the principles of the First Amendment of the Constitution and that means we don’t allow one individual or a group of people to dictate what people can or cannot read,” he said. “Most librarians if they got that sort of a question would be curious as to what the intent of the questioner was.”


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • FedoraLV Said: September 12th, 2008 at 7:06 pm
  • RogerM Said: September 12th, 2008 at 6:01 pm
    • Don’t you think that if Biden actually wanted you to have those rights that there would have been legislation put forward by him sometime in the LAST 26 YEARS? And Obama is no different, he DIDN’T DO ANYTHING while he was a state senator, and he’s done less in Congress. Wake up! They want your vote, not your “problems”.

  • RogerM Said: September 12th, 2008 at 5:58 pm
    • What? How do you even come up with this? She asked the librarian about book banning and never said what kind, what title, what author! And yet this gets twisted into banning a “gay book”? Wake up! This woman is better for the country than Obama, Biden, or McCain. She knows what EVERYONE is going through. She’s not sitting inside Washington just putting out the same old line that we’ve heard from them for 25 years.

  • Jason Said: September 12th, 2008 at 4:51 pm
    • the last thing we need in office after George is another religious wacko!

  • Jason Said: September 12th, 2008 at 4:49 pm
    • This all sounds very republican to me. Legislate your idealogy so that everyone else is forced to live by your religious ideas. Just great!!!

  • David in Dallas Said: September 12th, 2008 at 4:47 pm
    • We should be scared – VERY, VERY scared!

  • Jon Said: September 12th, 2008 at 4:05 pm
    • Nice try Rethuglicans but bottom line…..that Palin asked the question itself is telling. No amount of Fox News style spinning can change that one reality.

  • Karen Said: September 12th, 2008 at 3:54 pm
    • She was a small town mayor throwing her weight around. She never thought the whole world would be scrutinizing her conversations. Now she’s applying for the job of vice president and she knows her behavior doesn’t look quite right, so she’s minimizing. She’ll do that until she gets the job, then she’ll start her bullying again. Having to deny and defend so much alleged wrongdoing…. I don’t remember such allegations against a prez or veep candidate in my lifetime. And to think that her numbers are high in spite of it all, and the repugs are spinning it as unwarranted attacks…. What the hell is wrong with the people in this country?

  • Alex Parrish Said: September 12th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
    • Even if Palin’s question about banning books was, as she claims, “hypothetical,” the question itself, without clarification presents the perception of wrongdoing. A good leader knows that the framing of a question influences the response.

      If the “hypothetical” question was really directed at some, so far indemonstrable, issue from the past, stating so up-front would be far more likely to elicit a response which provided the required information than a context-free ‘hypothetical” construction.

      If Palin is so inept at managing that she doesn’t yet realize this it calls-into-question he preparedness for the vice-presidency.

      If she did realize these implications, then another possible scenario is that the question was truly “hypothetical” but the reason for it was to elicit a response which would then set-the-stage to fire the librarian. Once again, this is a despicable technique for managing staff (not uncommon, but evil nonetheless) and it calls into question her ethics and her character.

      No good manager poses a “hypothetical” question in such a way as to create the perception of wrongdoing unless it is purposeful or ignorantly misguided. Either way, Palin showed very poor judgement.

  • supershy Said: September 12th, 2008 at 12:20 pm
    • trevor is smoking the painful truth to you eugene & it seems you have trouble breathing it in! i guess you will tune into fox news now(the inhaler for right leaning types)

  • John Said: September 12th, 2008 at 12:11 pm
    • Well written article. If I can be more blunt:
      why would any lesbian, gay man, bi or transgendered person vote for a political team (McCain?Palin) that:
      wants the right to fire us from our jobs simply for being who we are; wants to deny us the right to serve our country in time of war even if we are fully capable of doing so; wants to deny our lifetime partners (and spouses) the ability to collect our social security benefits after we die, and wants to deny federal prosecuters the ability to harshly punish those who bash us soley because of who we are – when the other team (Obama/Biden) wants to give us all these deserving rights – antidiscrimination laws, ability to serve in the military, partner social security benefits and hate crime laws. Will some intelligent LGBT Republican explain this to me in clear terms? It seems to me, a LGBT person voting for McCain/Palin is like being Jewish and voting for a Jews for Jesus candidate, or being black and voting for a candidate who belongs to the Ku Klux Klan.

  • TigerTzu Said: September 12th, 2008 at 11:58 am
    • First comes the hypothetical book banning, followed by the hypothetical book burnings, then the hypothetical midnight arrests for publishing articles that does not follow official government doctrine. Keep in mind it is only hypothetical until she has the power and support to make it official.

  • eugene Said: September 12th, 2008 at 11:15 am
    • @trevor
      what are you smokin’?

  • Trevor Said: September 12th, 2008 at 10:18 am
    • Hmm…she was just asking a hypothetical question. Sheesh what’s the big deal you wacky libruls!? Well, suppose your boss asked you “How would you respond if I asked you not to serve African-American customers?” and you answered you would not follow that directive. Then later he asked for your resignation because he no longer felt he had your full support. You wouldn’t at the very least be suspicious of your boss’s agenda? The fact that Palin even considered (hypothetically of course) violating the First Amendment should be reason enough to keep her out of public office. Notice she is completely unapologetic.

  • MAN in Lexington, SC Said: September 12th, 2008 at 9:00 am
    • Whether or not the question of banning the boos was hypothetical or not the intent was there. It had to be because if it wasn’t Emmons would not have been fired.

      I do not want anyone, Democrat, repub or Independant to dictate what I or my family can or cannot read.

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook