<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

		


<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>365 Gay News &#187; Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/tag/supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:52:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Liberals closely watch Justice Ginsburg&#8217;s future plans</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/liberals-closely-watch-justice-ginsburgs-future-plans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/liberals-closely-watch-justice-ginsburgs-future-plans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 13:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>logointern3</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=22700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justice Ginsburg may stay through 2015, support liberal causes. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Washington) Democrats and liberals have a nightmare vision of the Supreme Court&#8217;s future: President Barack Obama is defeated for re-election next year and, at 78 the oldest justice, soon finds(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/liberals-closely-watch-justice-ginsburgs-future-plans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Culhane: The Court got the Phelps opinion wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-the-court-got-the-phelps-opinion-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-the-court-got-the-phelps-opinion-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Culhane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westboro Baptist Church]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=19511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The worship of the First Amendment has gone far enough.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An elderly man is standing near a grave. A funeral memorial service for his life-long partner has just concluded. Surrounded by mourners, he is allowing himself a moment of quiet reflection and(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/culhane-the-court-got-the-phelps-opinion-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1st Amendment protects Westboro, Court rules</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/1st-amendment-protects-westboro-court-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/1st-amendment-protects-westboro-court-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco/editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westboro Baptist Church]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=19423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment protects fundamentalist church members who mount anti-gay protests outside military funerals.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Washington) The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the First Amendment protects fundamentalist church members who mount anti-gay protests outside military funerals, despite the pain they cause(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/1st-amendment-protects-westboro-court-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court rejects appeal over DC gay marriage law</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/court-rejects-appeal-over-dc-gay-marriage-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/court-rejects-appeal-over-dc-gay-marriage-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=18670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from opponents of gay marriage who want to overturn the District of Columbia's gay marriage law.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> (Washington) The Supreme Court has rejected an appeal from opponents of same-sex marriage who want to overturn the District of Columbia&#8217;s gay marriage law.</p>
<p>The court did not comment Tuesday in(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/court-rejects-appeal-over-dc-gay-marriage-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court expected to rule on Gay Marriage in D.C.</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/topics/supreme-court-expected-to-rule-on-gay-marriage-in-d-c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/topics/supreme-court-expected-to-rule-on-gay-marriage-in-d-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 22:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>logointern1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Topics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=18596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court decision regarding pending court appeal rejecting the argument that Washington D.C. must allow voters to decide the marriage question in a ballot initiative is expected for upcoming Tuesday.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to announce an opinion Tuesday on whether to allow voters to repeal the Washington D.C. equal marriage law.</p>
<p>Jackson v. the D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/topics/supreme-court-expected-to-rule-on-gay-marriage-in-d-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bigotry Watch: NOM goes after Prop 8 judges</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/bigotry-watch-nom-goes-after-prop-8-judges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/bigotry-watch-nom-goes-after-prop-8-judges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 16:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Badash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clarence thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don't ask don't tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gays in the military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maggie Gallagher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage Equality USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Organization for Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 8 trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=18140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why  isn't religion a disqualifier for judges on gay marriage cases?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday, December 1, coincidentally both World AIDS Day and the fifty-fifth anniversary of freedom fighter Rosa Park&#8217;s refusal to give up her seat on an Alabama bus, Maggie Gallagher&#8217;s(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/opinion/bigotry-watch-nom-goes-after-prop-8-judges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High court allows gay military ban for now</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/high-court-allows-gay-military-ban-for-now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/high-court-allows-gay-military-ban-for-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 21:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco/editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don't ask don't tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gays in the military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=17855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court on Friday allowed the "don't ask, don't tell" policy on gays in the military to remain in place while a federal appeals court considers the issue.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Washington) The Supreme Court on Friday allowed the &#8220;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; policy on gays in the military to remain in place while a federal appeals court considers the issue.</p>
<p>The court did(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/high-court-allows-gay-military-ban-for-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court asked to review gay military ban</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/supreme-court-asked-to-review-gay-military-ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/supreme-court-asked-to-review-gay-military-ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 22:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco/editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[don't ask don't tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gays in the military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Log Cabin Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=17731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Log Cabin Republicans asked the U.S. Supreme Court to allow a California trial judge's order barring enforcement of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy on gays in the military to go back into effect.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(San Francisco) A Republican gay rights group on Friday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to allow a California trial judge&#8217;s order barring enforcement of the &#8220;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; policy on gays(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/supreme-court-asked-to-review-gay-military-ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay marriage foes seek freedom in running ads</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/gay-marriage-foes-seek-freedom-in-running-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/gay-marriage-foes-seek-freedom-in-running-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco/editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maggie Gallagher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Organization for Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=17431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NOM, which wants to run political ads unencumbered by some election law requirements, amped up its fight.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Buffalo, NY) A national anti-gay marriage group that wants to run political ads unencumbered by some election law requirements amped up its fight Thursday in two states, including New York,(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/gay-marriage-foes-seek-freedom-in-running-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thursday Watercooler: DADT returns</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/102110-dadt-is-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/blog/102110-dadt-is-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Withers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alec Baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anita Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DADT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ellen DeGeneres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fight Back NY]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Worth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[France]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesse Tyler Ferguson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joel Burns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lambda legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia A. Phillips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watercooler]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=17394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DADT is back....what the gaystream is talking about. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><strong>It was good while it lasted</strong>. For 24 hours, applicants to the United States military could be open about their sexuality. All that is over for now. A three-judge panel of the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/21/us/21recruit.html?hp"><strong>Court of Appeals(...)</strong></a></li></ul>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/blog/102110-dadt-is-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
		
