<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>365 Gay News &#187; gay and lesbian</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/tag/gay-and-lesbian/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:50:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Vanasco: Was AmazonFail a hacker prank?</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/vanasco-was-amazonfail-a-hacker-prank/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/blog/vanasco-was-amazonfail-a-hacker-prank/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 21:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazonfail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay and lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=6603</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe a prank - maybe not.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE: Well, maybe not. From <a href="http://www.feministing.com/archives/014797.html#comments" target="_blank">Feministing</a>:</p>
<p><em>She spoke to their Amazon rep today, and he told her it was <strong>definitely not a <a href="http://www.feministing.com/archives/014791.html">glitch</a></strong>.  From Brooke&#8217;s email to me:</em></p>
<blockquote><p><em>Basically he said that amazon has been experimenting with the way they dole out content specifically so that people who are searching Harry Potter or whatever won&#8217;t run into links to products that might be offensive. </em><em>&#8230;It&#8217;s super fucked up, but apparently he&#8217;s saying that Amazon is a bully when it comes to stuff like this and it&#8217;s all about sales for them and it&#8217;s not about censorship.<br />
</em></p>
<p><em>&#8230;He also said no human is responsible for the decisions per se, and that it&#8217;s all about tagging and feeds which are constantly being tweaked. He does think that amazon will retweak the tags based on the uproar that happened over the weekend. </em></p></blockquote>
<p>Others say that the rep doesn&#8217;t know what he/she is talking about. In any case, the &#8220;no human is responsible&#8221; line is kind of fishy. At <em>some </em> point, humans were involved. someone made the decision to tag, or not to tag, or to not reveal the truth to the public. Amazon is a giant company &#8211; why are there still rumors about this? Why hasn&#8217;t a statement from Jeff Bezos been released?</p>
<p><em>***</em></p>
<p>Gay websites, including this one, were aghast that Amazon.com seemed to have moved <a href="http://www.365gay.com/blog/amazoncom-decides-gay-books-are-adult/" target="_blank">many mainstream gay and lesbian books</a> into the &#8220;adult&#8221; category &#8211; and so automatically removing them from the sales rankings, while other books, like one of Playboy centerfolds, remained.</p>
<p>But it seems now that the tagging &#8211; which Twitter users quickly dubbed &#8220;#AmazonFail&#8221; was actually a <a href="http://gawker.com/5210142/why-it-makes-sense-that-a-hackers-behind-amazons-big-gay-outrage" target="_blank">hacker prank.</a></p>
<p>Gawker says that:</p>
<p><strong>The hacker, known as Weev, with whom <a href="http://valleywag.gawker.com/5032989/journalists-do-it-for-the-lulz">we&#8217;ve had dealings</a> before the &#8220;amazonfail&#8221; episode, is saying that the whole escapade was the result of his exploitation of a vulnerability in Amazon&#8217;s product-rating tools.</strong></p>
<p>On <a href="http://community.livejournal.com/brutal_honesty/3168992.html" target="_blank">livejournal</a>, Weev said:</p>
<p><strong>Hay dude. Amazon removed its customer-based reporting of adult books yesterday. I guess my game is up! Here&#8217;s a nice piece I like to call &#8220;how to cause moral outrage from the entire Internet in ten lines of code&#8221;.</strong></p>
<p>There are some doubters, though, saying Weev is taking responsibility for something that Amazon itself did.</p>
<p>Which is the truth? It sounds possible that it&#8217;s a prank &#8211; but even so, Amazon.com didn&#8217;t help itself by calling it a &#8220;glitch&#8221; instead of expressing extreme regret that dozens gay and lesbian books &#8211; such as Ellen DeGeneres&#8217; autobiography &#8211; would be accidentally classified as inappropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/blog/vanasco-was-amazonfail-a-hacker-prank/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon.com decides gay books are &#8220;adult&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/amazoncom-decides-gay-books-are-adult/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/blog/amazoncom-decides-gay-books-are-adult/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture & Ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AfterElton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brokeback Mountain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay and lesbian]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=6569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazon.com stripped the sales ranks of almost all gay and lesbian books on their site — including E. Annie Proulx's Brokeback Mountain.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><img src="/sites/www.afterelton.com/files/BBMGRCovers.jpg" border="0" alt="" width="424" height="318" /></div>
<p>What does a classic gay novel like <strong>James Baldwin</strong>&#8217;s <em>Giovanni&#8217;s Room </em>have to do with gay porn?</p>
<p>You&#8217;d think the answer would be pretty much &#8220;nothing.&#8221; But if that&#8217;s true, why would Amazon.com strip the sales ranks of almost all gay and lesbian books on their site — including <strong>E. Annie Proulx</strong>&#8217;s <em>Brokeback Mountain</em>, <strong>Edmund White</strong>&#8217;s <em>A Boy&#8217;s Own Story </em>and 20s lesbian classic <em>The Well of Loneliness</em> — at the same time it&#8217;s removing the sales rankings for adult novels?</p>
<p><!--break-->And it&#8217;s not just fiction. The blog <a href="http://community.livejournal.com/meta_writer/11992.html">Meta Writer</a> said that affected titles also include <em>The Advocate College Guide for LGBT Students</em>,<em> Taking a Chance on God: Liberating Theology for Gays, Lesbians, and Their Lovers, Families, and Friends</em> and <em>The Dictionary of Homophobia: A Global History of Gay &amp; Lesbian Experience</em>. And indeed, not one of those books has its sales ranking listed.</p>
<p>Asked &#8220;What&#8217;s up with that?&#8221; by a number of authors, Amazon sent out a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/blog/post/PLNKKNIVY1C5HA9N">form response</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In consideration of our entire customer base, we exclude &#8220;adult&#8221; material from appearing in some searches and best seller lists. Since these lists are generated using sales ranks, adult materials must also be excluded from that feature.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to know what&#8217;s more disturbing: That they&#8217;re removing <a href="/print/2008/11/bestgaybooks"><strong>gay and lesbian books</strong></a> from their search results and sales rankings in the first place, or that they&#8217;re categorizing anything about our community and our lives in the stigmatized &#8220;adult&#8221; category even when there&#8217;s nothing &#8220;adult&#8221; about it.</p>
<p>I mean, in what universe are books like <strong>Vito Russo</strong>&#8217;s <em>Celluloid Closet</em>, <strong>Randy Shilts</strong>&#8216; <em>The Mayor of Castro Street: The Life and Times of Harvey Milk</em> or <strong>Dan Savage</strong>&#8217;s<em> The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant</em> adult books?</p>
<p>I checked the gay young adult titles by AfterElton.com&#8217;s<strong> Brent Hartinger</strong>, and they all still have their sales rankings. A few other YA titles I looked at didn&#8217;t, however, including <strong>John Fox</strong>&#8217;s T<em>he Boys on the Rock</em>,<strong> Jim Grimsley</strong>&#8217;s<em> Dream Boy</em> and, ironically, <em>The Heart Has Its Reasons: Young Adult Literature with Gay/Lesbian/Queer Content, 1969-2004</em>.</p>
<p>Neither did <em>Speechless: Silencing the Christians: How Liberals and Homosexual Activists are Outlawing Christianity (and Judaism) to Force Their Sexual Agenda on America</em> or <em>Heather Has Two Mommies,</em> which has got to be one of the most banned books in American history. Nice company you&#8217;re in, Amazon.</p>
<p>Amazon.com has not responded to a request for a comment by AfterElton.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/blog/amazoncom-decides-gay-books-are-adult/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
