<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

		


<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>365 Gay News &#187; federal courts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/tag/federal-courts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:52:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gay marriage trial revives camera controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/gay-marriage-trial-revives-camera-controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/gay-marriage-trial-revives-camera-controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 14:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco/editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameras in the courtroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 8 trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=11516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court could rule as soon as Wednesday on whether to allow court employees to use a camera to record the Prop 8 trial.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(San Francisco) While the issue of same-sex marriage is widely expected to work its way to the U.S. Supreme Court over the next few years, another thorny legal question raised in the case has(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/gay-marriage-trial-revives-camera-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Withers: Ten random thoughts</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/081009-ten-random-thoughts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/blog/081009-ten-random-thoughts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Withers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fort Worth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rainbow Lounge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tel Aviv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=9037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Monday morning and ten more random thoughts. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-7235" title="10-2-top" src="http://www.365gay.com/wp-content/uploads/10-2-top-300x198.jpg" alt="10-2-top" width="300" height="198" /></p>
<p>1. I&#8217;m no expert (yet), but panhandling strikes me as a profession that requires a soft sell.</p>
<p>2. Do all Oklahoma politicians <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2009/08/08/sullivan-birther/"><strong>dance</strong></a> with the crazy?</p>
<p>3. Is it a good idea to keep allies from <a(...)</strong></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/blog/081009-ten-random-thoughts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mass. married gays sue for federal benefits</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/mass-married-gays-sue-for-federal-benefits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/mass-married-gays-sue-for-federal-benefits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco/editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=5719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than a dozen couples are suing the federal government, claiming DOMA  is unconstitutional because it denies them access to federal benefits that other married couples receive.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Boston, Massachusetts) Mary Ritchie, a Massachusetts State Police trooper, has been married for almost five years and has two children. But when she files her federal income tax return, she&#8217;s(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/mass-married-gays-sue-for-federal-benefits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
		
