<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>365 Gay News &#187; Equal Rep</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/tag/equal-rep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Will Obama flip flop on gay marriage?</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/will-obama-flip-flop-on-gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/will-obama-flip-flop-on-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emma Ruby-Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equal Rep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=7489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A grassroots online campaign has begun to pressure the administration to keep his campaign promise ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Boston, Massachusetts) Fears are mounting that the Obama administration is about to flip-flop on its opposition to the Federal Defense of Marriage Act.</p>
<p>Last March, a federal lawsuit was filed in Boston challenging the law which bars the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriage.  The Justice Department has until June 22 to respond to the lawsuit.  So far there has been no comment from either the department or the White House.</p>
<p>The Department of Justice typically defends laws passed by Congress. But during the election campaign, then-candidate Obama pledged to overturn the ban.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://domaflipflop.com/?page_id=34" target="_blank">grassroots online campaign</a>  called Equal Rep has begun to pressure the administration to keep his campaign promise by asking Attorney General Eric Holder &#8220;not to defend this unconstitutional law.&#8221; 365gay blogger <a href="http://www.365gay.com/blog/ruby-sachs-obama-dont-defend-doma" target="_blank">Emma Ruby-Sachs helped craft the legal memo </a>to Obama, which states in part, &#8220;The President reserves the right to refuse to defend an unconstitutional statute. Section 3 of the DOMA is clearly unconstitutional in that it denies married same-sex couples economic benefits granted to heterosexual married couples from the same state without providing a rational basis for this discrimination. &#8221;</p>
<p>The Web site includes a cut-out mailer urging the president not to flip flop on the issue.</p>
<p>Support is slowly growing in Congress for repeal of the 1998 law, but a bill has yet to be filed in either the House or the Senate. In the meantime, the lawsuit challenging DOMA appears likely to proceed.</p>
<p>The lawsuit was filed by Gay &amp; Lesbian Advocates &amp; Defenders, the group that brought a successful legal challenge leading to Massachusetts becoming the first state in the nation to legalize gay marriage in 2004.  GLAD brought a similar successful suit in Connecticut.</p>
<p>GLAD represents eight married couples and three surviving spouses from Massachusetts who have been denied federal legal protections available to spouses. The lawsuit alleges that the act discriminates against gay couples and is unconstitutional because it denies them access to federal benefits that other married couples receive, such as pensions and health insurance. </p>
<p>Among the plaintiffs is Dean Hara, the widower of former U.S. Rep. Gerry Studds, the first openly gay member of the House of Representatives.</p>
<p>Another plaintiff is Mary Ritchie, a Massachusetts State Police trooper who has been married for almost five years and has two children. But when she files her federal income tax return, she&#8217;s not allowed to check the &#8220;married filing jointly&#8221; box as a result of DOMA.</p>
<p>In Ritchie&#8217;s case, she and her spouse say they have paid nearly $15,000 more in taxes than they would have if they had been able to file joint returns.</p>
<p>The Defense of Marriage Act, or DOMA, was enacted by Congress in 1996 when it appeared Hawaii would soon legalize same-sex marriage and opponents worried that other states would be forced to recognize such marriages. </p>
<p>The GLAD lawsuit challenges only the portion of the law that prevents the federal government from affording Social Security and other benefits to same-sex couples. </p>
<p>Among those in Congress calling for repeal of the act is Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), one of the original supporters of the measure. Harkin said earlier this month that he has changed his mind on same-sex marriage.</p>
<p>&#8221;We all grow as we get older, we learn things, we become more sensitive to people and people&#8217;s lives,&#8221; Harkin told Iowa public television. &#8221;The more I&#8217;ve looked at that, I&#8217;ve grown to think differently about how we should live. I guess I&#8217;ve got to the point of live and let live.&#8221;</p>
<p>Even if the bill is filed this session, it may find difficulty getting to a vote.  In addition to opposition from Republicans and number of conservative Democrats, mainly from Bible belt states Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) seems in no rush to advance repeal.</p>
<p>This month Pelosi suggested there may not be enough votes yet for repeal. </p>
<p>In a recent Quinnipiac University public opinion poll, voters showed narrow support maintaining DOMA &#8211; 50-44 percent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/will-obama-flip-flop-on-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ruby-Sachs: A Follow-Up on Visibility</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/ruby-sachs-a-follow-up-on-visibility/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/blog/ruby-sachs-a-follow-up-on-visibility/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ERubySachs</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce secretary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equal Rep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hochberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=4710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While giving a carte blanche to corrupt gay politicians is never a good idea, I stand by the assertion that gay representation might be sufficiently important at this juncture that some may advocate for any representative, even if their other political ideas aren&#8217;t popular.
There is no easy answer to this question and, to provide more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While giving a carte blanche to corrupt gay politicians is never a good idea, I stand by the assertion that gay representation might be sufficiently important at this juncture that some may advocate for any representative, even if their other political ideas aren&#8217;t popular.</p>
<p>There is no easy answer to this question and, to provide more fodder, Equal Rep is starting a campaign to have a gay replacement for Richardson.</p>
<p>Fred Hochberg, former deputy administrator of the Small Business Administration, former member of Clinton&#8217;s Management Council and current Agency Team Leader for the transition team, is also openly gay.</p>
<p>Equal Rep&#8217;s founder, Paul Sousa, points out that there is no gay representative in Obama&#8217;s cabinet and urges the President-Elect to act on the fact that LGBT people are &#8220;<span style="border-collapse: collapse;">only minority group to have never been appointed in the history of the United States. Fred Hochberg is supremely qualified and this opening is the perfect opportunity for our President-elect to show gay Americans they have not been forgotten and he is truly committed to equal representation.&#8221;</span></p>
<p><span style="border-collapse: collapse;">More information can be found <a href="http://www.equalrep.com/" target="_blank">HERE.</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/blog/ruby-sachs-a-follow-up-on-visibility/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
