<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

		


<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>365 Gay News &#187; Defense of Marriage Act</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/tag/defense-of-marriage-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:52:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Clock now ticking on DOMA appeals</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/clock-now-ticking-on-doma-appeals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/clock-now-ticking-on-doma-appeals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>logointern1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=16378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government has not yet decided whether it will appeal the two cases that found DOMA unconstitutional - and they're running out of time. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s been 40 days since U.S. District Court Judge Joseph Tauro ruled—<a href="http://www.365gay.com/news/culhane-doma-decision-is-a-ruling-for-equality/" target="_blank">in two cases</a>—that the federal benefits provision in the<a href="http://www.365gay.com/news/explanation-of-the-doma-decision/"> Defense of Marriage Act</a> is unconstitutional.</p>
<p>But the Department(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/clock-now-ticking-on-doma-appeals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama on legality of DOMA? Who knows!?</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/obama-on-legality-of-doma-who-knows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/obama-on-legality-of-doma-who-knows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>logointern1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gibbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=15913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gibbs said that while Obama does not agree with DOMA, he doesn’t know the president’s stance on its constitutionality. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said in an exchange with <a href="http://advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2010/07/29/Obamas_Views_On_DOMA_A_Mystery/">The Advocate</a> that he didn’t know how Obama viewed the legality of the Defense of Marriage Act.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.365gay.com/wp-content/uploads/news-barack-obama-top.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full  wp-image-14414" title="news-barack-obama-top" src="http://www.365gay.com/wp-content/uploads/news-barack-obama-top.jpg" alt="" width="352" height="235" /></a></p>
<p>Gibbs said: “I have not(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/obama-on-legality-of-doma-who-knows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hawaii lawsuit seeks equal rights for gay couples</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/hawaii-lawsuit-seeks-equal-rights-for-gay-couples/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/hawaii-lawsuit-seeks-equal-rights-for-gay-couples/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:09:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco/editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hawaii]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=15852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Six gay couples in Hawaii are filing a lawsuit Thursday asking for the same rights as married couples, three weeks after Gov. Linda Lingle vetoed a same-sex civil unions measure.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Honolulu) Six gay couples in Hawaii are filing a lawsuit Thursday asking for the same rights as married couples, three weeks after Gov. Linda Lingle vetoed a same-sex civil unions measure.</p>
<p>The(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/hawaii-lawsuit-seeks-equal-rights-for-gay-couples/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Members of Congress respond to DOMA decision</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/members-of-congress-respond-to-doma-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/members-of-congress-respond-to-doma-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 22:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>logointern1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerrold Nadler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tammy Baldwin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=15428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While congressional legislation to repeal DOMA may not pass, representatives speak in favor of the Mass. judge's ruling.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the White House has been silent regarding the Mass. judge’s finding that the <a href="http://www.365gay.com/news/explanation-of-the-doma-decision/">Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional</a>, members of Congress have begun to respond.</p>
<p>Rep. Jerrold Nadler(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/members-of-congress-respond-to-doma-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Explanation of the DOMA decision</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/explanation-of-the-doma-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/explanation-of-the-doma-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 23:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>logointern1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GLAD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Coakley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 8 trial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=15373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A breakdown of the two cases, who is affected, and what it may mean for Prop 8.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Federal District Court Judge Joseph Tauro ruled today that section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional. Read<a href="http://www.365gay.com/news/fed-judge-rules-against-doma-twice/" target="_blank"> Lisa Keen&#8217;s full story </a>for quotes and context.</p>
<p>Tauro ruled based on(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/explanation-of-the-doma-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Withers: Is Obama the first gay president?</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/033110-obama-the-first-gay-president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/blog/033110-obama-the-first-gay-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Withers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DADT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Research Council]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=13147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Family Research Council wonders if Barack Obama is the first gay president. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.365gay.com/wp-content/uploads/Barack-Obama-top.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-13148" title="Barack Obama-top" src="http://www.365gay.com/wp-content/uploads/Barack-Obama-top-300x198.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="198" /></a></p>
<p>No way to prepare you for this. So here it is: the <a href="http://www.thecloakroomblog.com/2010/03/p-7/"><strong>Family Research Council</strong></a> thinks Barack Obama could be the first gay president because of his fealty to &#8220;the homosexual agenda.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Since taking(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/blog/033110-obama-the-first-gay-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US asks court to dismiss challenge to marriage law</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/us-asks-court-to-dismiss-challenge-to-marriage-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/us-asks-court-to-dismiss-challenge-to-marriage-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lesbian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=9717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Justice on Friday asked a federal judge in Boston to dismiss a lawsuit that claims a federal law defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman is unconstitutional.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Boston) The Department of Justice on Friday asked a federal judge in Boston to dismiss a lawsuit that claims a federal law defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman is(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/us-asks-court-to-dismiss-challenge-to-marriage-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frank not on board with DOMA bill</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/frank-not-on-board-with-doma-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/frank-not-on-board-with-doma-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco/editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=9622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Frank says the bill is "a mistake."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Washington) A bill seeking to repeal the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was introduced today but this “top priority” for the community is already relegated to a legislative(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/frank-not-on-board-with-doma-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Backers of gay marriage want to repeal federal law</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/backers-of-gay-marriage-want-to-repeal-federal-law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/backers-of-gay-marriage-want-to-repeal-federal-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=9610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gay marriage supporters are moving to repeal a law that denies federal benefits to same-sex couples, but there's little chance of a vote this year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Washington) Gay marriage supporters are moving to repeal a law that denies federal benefits to same-sex couples, but there&#8217;s little chance of a vote this year.</p>
<p>Repeal legislation to be(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/backers-of-gay-marriage-want-to-repeal-federal-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Money Matters 2: How does marriage affect personal finance?</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/video/money-matters-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/video/money-matters-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 00:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco/editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ask the Expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Is_Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money & Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annie Leibovitz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Studds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suze Orman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=9330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marriage is a financial contract - married straight people automatically get benefits we don't, no matter what state we're partnered, unioned or married. Suze Orman sets us "straight."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marriage is a financial contract &#8211; married straight people automatically get benefits we don&#8217;t, no matter what state we&#8217;re partnered, unioned or married in. Financial guru Suze Orman says unti(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/video/money-matters-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
		
