<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>365 Gay News &#187; California Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/tag/california-supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:35:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Withers: Will NY follow NH?</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/060409-will-new-york-have-gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/blog/060409-will-new-york-have-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Withers</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Lynch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Duane]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that New Hampshire has gay marriage, will New York follow? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-7797" title="ny-skyline-top" src="http://www.365gay.com/wp-content/uploads/ny-skyline-top-300x196.jpg" alt="ny-skyline-top" width="300" height="196" /></p>
<p>What a difference a week makes (too bad Dinah Washington isn&#8217;t around to give us a <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_a_Diff%27rence_a_Day_Made"><strong>rendition</strong></a> of her signature song). Seven days ago there was teeth gnashing over the California Supreme Court&#8217;s decision to <a href="http://www.365gay.com/blog/vanasco-prop-8-upheld/"><strong>uphold</strong></a> the Prop 8 vote.  Heck we even had some keyboard revolutionaries leaving messages here about how it&#8217;s time  to either shoot straight people or burn a few churches (how is that going you little pink <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mau_Mau"><strong>Mau Maus</strong></a>?). <span id="more-3829"></span></p>
<p>Today there is nothing but jubilation. Yesterday New Hampshire Gov. John Lynch put his <a href="http://www.365gay.com/news/vanasco-new-hampshire-house-votes-for-gay-marriage/"><strong>signature</strong></a> on a gay marriage bill and starting in 2010, same sex couples will be able to walk down the aisle in the Live Free or Die State. The happiness is well deserved because it proves what Dan Savage pointed out: we are <a href="http://slog.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2009/05/26/were-winning"><strong>winning</strong></a>.</p>
<p>Attention now turns to New York and there is conflicting data. State Sen.Tom Duane, who is leading the fight in Albany, says there are enough<a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2009/06/02/2009-06-02_progay_nups_pol_itll_pass.html"><strong> votes</strong></a> to pass same sex marriage  legislation. This turned Duane&#8217;s colleague,  Sen. Ruben Diaz Sr., hissy and the anti-gay marriage advocate <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dailypolitics/2009/06/diaz-sr-to-duane-release-the-n.html"><strong>released</strong></a> a statement telling Duane to &#8220;shut-up&#8221; (Diaz has a <a href="http://www.365gay.com/blog/121208-diaz-tries-to-explain/"><strong>history</strong></a> of  press releases filled with operatic histrionics).</p>
<p>Wish I had a crystal ball that would show how the New York Senate will vote, but I have no idea what is going to happen. Nate Silver, over at 538.com, <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/06/is-gay-marraige-coming-or-going-in-ny.html"><strong>crunches</strong></a> the numbers and says it&#8217;s going to be a tough haul but nothing is definitive.</p>
<p>It makes my day to think like Nate.</p>
<p>PS: RIP <a href="http://www.theroot.com/buzz/koko-taylor-blues-legend-dead-80"><strong>Koko Taylor</strong></a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/blog/060409-will-new-york-have-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daigle: The 18,000</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/daigle-the-18000/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/blog/daigle-the-18000/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 21:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>codydaigle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=7604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prop. 8 stands. But so do 18,000 same-sex marriages.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-7605" title="blog-gay-couple-pink-heart-top" src="http://www.365gay.com/wp-content/uploads/blog-gay-couple-pink-heart-top.jpg" alt="blog-gay-couple-pink-heart-top" width="352" height="252" /></p>
<p>Proposition 8 stands.</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t unexpected, but the news still stung.</p>
<p>If I lived in a part of the country where protests and rallies were being held today, I&#8217;d probably find myself at one of them.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s anger. There&#8217;s disappointment. There&#8217;s frustration. It&#8217;d be nice to share it with a few thousand other people feeling angry, disappointed and frustrated, too.</p>
<p>I keep thinking, though, about the 18,000 couples who got good news today. Their marriages weren&#8217;t erased. Their families are still intact. The life they woke up to this morning will be the same life they take to bed with them tonight, and I think that&#8217;s a solace on a day like today. I think that&#8217;s a reason to celebrate.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t begrudge anyone their anger today. While I tend to demure from it, I think there&#8217;s something cathartic about lashing out on day like today with a little directionless anger. Some of the responses to the ruling I&#8217;ve read online seemed to unpack the frustration of our whole struggle into this one single opinion, and while it&#8217;s not constructive, I can appreciate its comfort. So be angry today, if you feel as though you must. Rage against this with others who share your anger and find some satisfaction in the camaraderie of outrage.</p>
<p>(tangential thought on anger today: Our anger can&#8217;t supersede our reason. While it might feel good to punch Maggie Gallagher in the face, it won&#8217;t necessarily further our cause. I&#8217;m not advocating punching Maggie Gallagher anywhere, mind you. Or anyone else, for that matter. It was just a random example. I just hope our anger becomes an informed anger, a respectful anger, one that blossoms into activism and advocacy. Not a bruised eye, a spray-painted wall, or unnecessarily hateful language directed at anyone.)</p>
<p>But don&#8217;t forget about those 18,000 couples.</p>
<p>When our anger subsides, and our lives return to normal, we will have 18,000 couples in California who are living examples of the power and benefit of marriage equality. And if we know what&#8217;s best for us, we are going to throw every ounce of resolve and determination behind those 18,000 couples and make sure every Californian (hell, every American while we&#8217;re at it) sees, in their faces, what marriage equality truly means and and looks like: loving and productive couples, loving and productive families, loving and productive people that make our communities better.</p>
<p>Today is a setback, not a defeat. When you doubt that, remember those 18,000 couples. And the couples in Massachusetts, in Connecticut, in Iowa, in Maine. We have proof that marriage equality doesn&#8217;t bring down the whole of Western Civilization. And we&#8217;ll have that proof tomorrow and every day after that.</p>
<p>Anger today. Activism tomorrow.</p>
<p>And to the 18,000 couples in California, congratulations. May your marriages last forever. They endured today. They can endure anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/blog/daigle-the-18000/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vanasco: Prop 8 upheld</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/blog/vanasco-prop-8-upheld/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/blog/vanasco-prop-8-upheld/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Vanasco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=7596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After months, we have our answer. And it's not good.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After months of waiting, the California Supreme Court decision on Proposition 8 is in:</p>
<p>Prop 8 is upheld &#8211; there will be no new gay marriage in California. But the 18,000 couples in California who were married last summer will stay married.</p>
<p>More to come after we read the decision. Read the <a href="http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/" target="_blank">gay marriage decision</a> for yourself.</p>
<p>In the meantime &#8211; want to protest? Check out <a href="http://www.dayofdecision.com/" target="_blank">DayofDecision.com</a> to find an event tonight near you.</p>
<p>A great recap of how we came to this point is at the<a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/05/california-supreme-court-to-rule-on-proposition-8.html" target="_blank"> LA Times.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://cbs5.com/cbsnewslive" target="_blank">Prop 8 press conferences</a> are live here until 2:30 EST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/blog/vanasco-prop-8-upheld/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
