<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

		


<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>365 Gay News &#187; ballot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/tag/ballot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:52:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Vanasco: Is Maine about to lose marriage?</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/vanasco-is-maine-about-to-lose-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/vanasco-is-maine-about-to-lose-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco/editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No on 1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=9676</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Poll numbers from the Daily Kos suggest that Maine might be about to go the way of California.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poll numbers from the <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/statepoll/2009/9/16/ME/376" target="_blank">Daily Kos suggest</a> that Maine might be about to go the way of California &#8211; even though it seems that the state is currently leaning Democratic.</p>
<p><a href="http://67.199.35.190/index.cfm" target="_blank">Send money to Maine.(...)</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/vanasco-is-maine-about-to-lose-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-domestic partner referendum makes ballot</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/anti-domestic-partner-referendum-makes-ballot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/anti-domestic-partner-referendum-makes-ballot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 14:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco/editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic partnership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=9404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new Washington State law was supposed to take effect on July 26. But the referendum campaign put it on hold.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Olympia, Wash.) A referendum on an expansion of Washington&#8217;s domestic partnership law for gay couples has qualified for the November ballot, election officials said Monday.</p>
<p>The &#8220;everything but(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/anti-domestic-partner-referendum-makes-ballot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle to reverse Prop 8 begins</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/battle-to-reverse-prop-8-begins/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/battle-to-reverse-prop-8-begins/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco/editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=4610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gay groups have begun efforts to put a repeal of Proposition 8 on the 2010 ballot. 
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>(San Francisco) LGBT groups have begun efforts to put a repeal of Proposition 8 on the 2010 ballot. </p>
<p>Prop 8, passed by voters in November, bars same-sex marriage in California.  The(...)</p></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/battle-to-reverse-prop-8-begins/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Money flowing in on both sides ofn Calif. gay marriage issue</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/money-flowing-in-on-both-sides-ofn-calif-gay-marriage-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/money-flowing-in-on-both-sides-ofn-calif-gay-marriage-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco/editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=2773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The battle over a battle effort to amend the California Constitution to ban same-sex marriage could be the most costly amendment ever.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(San Francisco, California) The battle over a battle effort to amend the California Constitution to ban same-sex marriage could be the most costly amendment ever.</p>
<p>Hundreds of thousands of(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/money-flowing-in-on-both-sides-ofn-calif-gay-marriage-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay foes want ballot initiative process in Connecticut</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/082008-connecticut-ballot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/082008-connecticut-ballot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco/editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[initiative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VisibleVote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=2706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Family Institute of Connecticut wants a system of direct initiative - in which people can petition to get issues onto the ballot - because it hopes voters will eventually pass a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Hartford, Connecticut) A coalition of same-sex marriage opponents and taxpayer groups is trying to persuade voters to approve a state constitutional convention in the hopes of bringing the(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/082008-connecticut-ballot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay foes end battle over Calif. amendment wording</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/081208-california-amendment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/081208-california-amendment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco/editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jerry Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=2602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A group behind a proposed amendment that would ban same-sex marriage in California is abandoning its fight over the wording that will appear on the November ballot.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(San Francisco, California) A group behind a proposed amendment that would ban same-sex marriage in California is abandoning its fight over the wording that will appear on the November(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/081208-california-amendment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calif. judge: Gay-friendly ballot wording OK</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/080808-calif-ballot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/080808-calif-ballot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco/editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=2567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Sacramento, California) A judge in Sacramento ruled Friday that the revamped wording on a ballot initiative that would ban same-sex marriage in the California constitution is acceptable. The ballot question originally had been described as a measure to limit marriage between a man and a woman. Last month Attorney General Jerry Brown changed the description [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Sacramento, California) A judge in Sacramento ruled Friday that the revamped wording on a ballot initiative that would ban same-sex marriage in the California constitution is acceptable.</p>
<p>The(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/080808-calif-ballot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ballot Measure Would Cancel Gainesville LGBT Protections</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/073008-gainesville-ballot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/073008-gainesville-ballot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco/editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gainesville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public accomodations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transgender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=2370</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Gainesville, Florida) A social conservative voters group opposed to a Gainesville law protecting the rights of transpeople in employment and housing has mounted a repeal effort that could terminate rights of all LGBT people in the city. On Tuesday, Citizens for Good Public Policy turned in more than the required number of signatures to have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Gainesville, Florida) A social conservative voters group opposed to a Gainesville law protecting the rights of transpeople in employment and housing has mounted a repeal effort that could(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/073008-gainesville-ballot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Major Calif. Company To Fight Anti-Gay Ballot Measure</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/073008-company-calif-ballot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.365gay.com/news/073008-company-calif-ballot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Vanasco/editor</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ballot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=2364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(San Francisco, Calif.) California&#8217;s largest public utility has given a quarter-million dollars to the fight against a proposed constitutional amendment that would ban same-sex marriage in the state. Pacific Gas and Electric Company turned the check over to NO on 8 – the organization formed by Equality California, the state&#8217;s largest LGBT civil rights group [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(San Francisco, Calif.) California&#8217;s largest public utility has given a quarter-million dollars to the fight against a proposed constitutional amendment that would ban same-sex marriage in the(...)</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.365gay.com/news/073008-company-calif-ballot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
		
