The Pope is not pro-life
Signaling a meaningful change from President George W. Bush’s disastrous policies, the Obama administration last week endorsed a United Nations statement calling for the worldwide decriminalization of homosexuality. The primary opponents of this measure were radical Islamist countries and the Vatican, representing a new unholy alliance across the globe.
The previous day on his way to Africa, the Pope spoke to reporters about the role condoms play in the prevention of HIV. Unbelievably, the Pontiff said they make the epidemic worse.
“You can’t resolve it with the distribution of condoms,” the Pope told reporters aboard the Alitalia plane headed to Yaounde, Cameroon, where he began a seven-day pilgrimage on the continent. “On the contrary, it increases the problem.”
Internationally, people were stunned at the Pope’s scientific ignorance and indifference to human suffering. Africa, after all, is a continent with more than 22 million people living with the disease. Only thin strips of latex have stopped this figure from rapidly multiplying and leaving behind an even more horrific trail of death.
How many people is this man willing to see die to defend his outdated dogma? How high must the body count be before the Pope is no longer considered pro-life?
French foreign ministry spokesman Eric Chevallier justifiably reacted with exasperation when he said, “While it is not up to us to pass judgment on Church doctrine, we consider that such comments are a threat to public health policies and the duty to protect human life.” German officials called the Pope’s statement “irresponsible” urged the availability of condoms in Africa.
How ironic that a Pope fixated on stanching the decline of the Catholic Church in Western Europe would declare something so out of touch with the modern world. His unconscionable cruelty has transformed him into crusty relic on the verge of irrelevance.
Appearing on Fox’s O’Reilly Factor last week, I debated the Pope’s statement with writer Raymond Arroyo. I pointed out that UNAIDS, calls the condom the “single, most efficient, available technology to reduce the sexual transmission of HIV.” Arroyo responded with a bizarre conspiracy theory saying that the United Nations group was only trying to “protect the government infusion of money to these condom programs that have demonstrably not worked at all.”
Then I asked Arroyo point blank: “If all the condoms in Africa magically disappeared, would the number of HIV cases increase or decrease?”
He responded that HIV would decrease if people would model their lives on the Pope’s “ideal way in which to live.”
In the ideal world promoted by Arroyo, priests would not rape little boys, while getting shuffled around parishes to protect the church. In the real world, the Vatican has spent millions of dollars to pay for child abuse lawsuits. In Arroyo’s fantasy world, young people pledge abstinence until marriage. In the real world, studies show that teens taking virginity pledges were just as likely to engage in sex – and less likely to use birth control or condoms when they finally did.
It is such wanton disregard for reality and wearing of rose-colored shades to blind oneself from avoidable carnage that define fanaticism. There is something pathological and perverse in the psyche of people willing to do enormous wrong in order to prove their doctrine right.
The history books will not be kind to this Pope. From rehabilitating Holocaust deniers, to rampant homophobia, to fighting against legislation allowing victims of child sexual abuse to sue, “Bumbling Benedict” seems to lurch from one avoidable crisis to another.
As he flails in his attempts to woo Europe and ultimately fails in the West, the Pontiff will increasingly dupe the developing world. His road show will focus on poor countries where people aren’t as attuned to the ethical depravity of his unscientific proclamations. Indeed, few people will hear from those suffering after the Pope goes home and they die in silent anonymity – victims of a flawed and fatalistic vision. Far from infallibility, this Pope has failed on so many levels that he has virtually no credibility on matters of morality.
During the show, Arroyo asked me, “What do you want him to do, hand out IUD’s and condoms from the Pope Mobile?”
If that’s what it takes to save human lives, then the answer is yes. One would think that this is what a man of God would be commanded to do. But, sadly, compassion is out of fashion at the Vatican these days.





Well said, Wayne. I would go one step further and say he is an accomplice to murder. Sadly, many will heed the “advice” of the Poop and forfeit their health and that of their family under the belief that this is God’s will.
The Pope’s position amounts to genocide in countries like Uganda. Benedict is so dogmatic and doctrine-bound, I really think that somewhere he believes that if one-third of all Africans died from AIDS, it would be God’s will. But no–the Church will spin it as condoms being part of a white conspiracy to keep black Africans from reproducing. It’s interesting how the Catholic Church couldn’t exist anymore if it weren’t for the Third World. Maybe they’ll move out of Rome and free up the property.
So there’s an issue with being pro-choice? Why? I’m pro-choice. This doesn’t mean that I’m okay with murder, because I’m not. But I don’t agree with the law trying to control how we use our body. Besides, not everbody chooses to get pregnant. Some circumstances force people into abortion, so cut them some slack.
Heir Benedict is perhaps the greatest living example of the dangers of long-standing, societally approved brainwashing aka organized religion. The man is a danger to society.
One could argue it either way. Condom availability may increase sexually activity over time in a society to some degree, which can lead to increased unprotected sex, that leads to more cases of HIV. Who knows? The sexual revolution in the US may never have occurred without the development first of birth control pills and condoms years before. Personally I say let folks have the condoms, but you never know what causes what. It is not black and white.
Religion is poison….
We should give the pope a new title after his condom remark.
I propose, “Benedictus Infectus”.
Well hey folks lets look on the “bright” side. As “heartless” as this may sound at least it couldn’t happen to a more backward, ignorant continent now could it? I mean if these African citizens are soooo out of touch with reality that they’d believe anything this delusional old f*ck would preach anyway, then maybe, just maybe they deserve all the suffering and misery that their ignorance can heap upon them. There comes a certain period in one’s life when you have to assume a little common sense in regards to thinking for yourself. If these homophobic morons in Africa can’t simply realize that this disease can be hindered by the simple usage of condoms, then maybe we should just let evolution run its course. As far as I’m concerned “ex” hitler youth nazi Been-a-dick ratsass PROBABLY wants this to happen!
“One could argue it either way. Condom availability may increase sexually activity over time in a society to some degree, which can lead to increased unprotected sex, that leads to more cases of HIV.”
I don’t beleive this. Condoms do not make people have sex – sex drives make people have sex. The idea is idiotic. Are you telling me that people would not think of having sex until they see a condom dispenser? Then one person looks at the other and says, “It never crossed my mind before, but let’s jump in the sack.”
Come on. Let’s use some common sense.
As a Catholic, it dissapoints me to here the Pope use such unsympathetic language. This is just another example of the leaders of the Church being inept of the intracacies of modern day life. This is why homosexuality is still considered a “disorder”, abortion is MURDER in all circumstances, and birth control is also considered sinful and aids to abortion… When will the Church live up to the rhetoric that Pope Benedict promotoes about the integration of faith and reason? When it comes to sex the Church just doesn’t want to look at science, ultimately, probably because it threatens its patriarchal structure…*sigh* I hope and pray everyday for the reform and renewal of the Catholic Church as a gay Catholic.
Simply amazing how some homos out there are filled with soooo much guilt and self loathing that they would even consider being a part of such a half assed relic like the KKKatholic Church. *sigh*, I guess some apologists will just never learn.
I did not mean to anger the great Mr. Besen, but I have family members and friends that LOVE the pope, go to church every week. Being around them I know can cloud your mind. They are nice folks though. What you write is applicable in the USA with American traditions and practices. I am not so sure what you say translates across the ocean to a different continent altogether. Right, people do have sex for sex. But in other cultures there may be more to it than what we can see from here. Mr. Bensen, a little religion is not so bad, really. And what makes you think that all the people there will not wear a condom solely because the Pope told them not to? Folks have independent brains in Africa too. Yes, give out condoms.
The Pope, ‘A man of God’? Hardly. He is the head of an organized religion having centuries of man made dogma. Evil, yes.
It’s, I guess, strange to see someone who has had the words “perverse”, “pathological”, “irresponsible”, “sick”, “depraved”, “unconscionsable”, etc. used on him (because of some behavior that spread an incurable disease) use those same words on someone who spoke the truth of human behavior. We can control outselves. We are as dogs smelling a bitch in heat….or are you? Look in a mirror before you use those words on someone else again….please.
adventr99 could benefit from using Google.
http://www.avert.org/condoms.htm
The U.S. was nearly 3000 years behind the Egyptians in the development and use of condoms.
Mr. Besen is correct that we are stimulated to have sex by our hormones not a device.