November 21st, 2009
 

365 Gay: Opinion

Rudolph: Repealing DADT Is Only the First Step


The LGBT community is abuzz with the possibility that President Obama will repeal the military’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” (DADT) policy. This is a necessary and important step towards equality for LGBT Americans and enabling our military to recruit and retain qualified personnel.

Repealing DADT, however, is only the first step—albeit the most important one—towards equality for LGBT servicemembers. Unless the federal government not only permits openly lesbian and gay servicemembers, but also recognizes their families, we are asking those servicemembers to defend our country with a fraction of the support given to non-LGBT personnel.

The military takes family support very seriously. Army companies, for example, each contain a Family Readiness Group, “an official command sponsored organization of Family Members, volunteers, and Soldiers belonging to a unit, that together provide an avenue of support and assistance. This network of communication between Family Members, volunteers, the chain of command, and community resources, is for Soldier and Family readiness.”

Military families get an extensive set of benefits and resources, including medical and dental insurance, group life insurance, higher pay and housing allowances for servicemembers with spouses or children, coverage for family moving expenses, temporary on-base housing until they find a home, and emergency financial relief funds through four private, nonprofit societies that manage these funds for each branch of the service. On an everyday basis, spouses can buy groceries and goods just above cost at the on-base commissary and Post Exchange (PX).

Spouses and children may enroll in the Survivor Benefit Plan, which pays a monthly annuity upon the servicemember’s death. They are also eligible for Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance, with coverage up to $100,000 for a spouse and $10,000 for a child.

The frequent relocations of military life make it hard for a spouse to hold a continuous job. Non-military spouses are generally not considered residents of the state in which their active-duty spouse resides, and are thus ineligible for many state benefits like unemployment compensation. Spouses can, however, apply for Military Spouse Scholarships and other financial aid towards training and education for “portable” careers.

Military bases also offer a plethora of support groups and services for spouses and children when a servicemember is deployed, has been injured or killed, or is dealing with the transition back from combat. On a more casual basis, access to on-base facilities puts spouses and children in a community of others who understand the stresses of military life. The military also protects spouses and children with a program dedicated to the prevention and treatment of abuse.

When a family has children, support extends in other ways, such as free New Parent Support Programs, where Registered Nurses and Licensed Medical Social Workers give advice on pregnancy, parenting, and more through home visits, classes, support groups and referrals to community services.

Children of military personnel may also take part in accredited, on-base childcare programs, or in some cases, off-base childcare at the lower on-base rate. (The military runs the largest employer-supported childcare program in the U.S.) On-base schools are not only convenient, but provide a peer group of other children and youth dealing with the frequent dislocations and concerns of life in a military family. The military also offers children a full range of after-school support groups and recreational activities.

There are special college scholarships for children of military families, and free SAT/ACT test preparation. Should the children choose public universities, they pay in-state college tuition rates in either their home state or state of their parent’s duty assignment.

The catch to all this? Spouses must be recognized by the federal government. Children must be legal children of the servicemember. This means that even after the repeal of DADT, same-sex spouses will not qualify for the benefits above. If the non-military spouse is the biological or adoptive parent and the couple is resident in a state that does not permit second-parent adoptions, the children would not qualify for benefits, either.

Soberingly, when the worst happens, only spouses, blood relatives, or adoptive relatives can handle the disposition of remains for a deceased servicemember.

With the repeal of DADT, it is reasonable to assume more lesbian and gay servicemembers will choose to stay in the service longer. They would thus be more likely to have a spouse and/or children at some point in their military careers, making the recognition of their relationships a growing issue.

The wording of final legislation to repeal DADT is still up in the air, but the version currently in the House, H.R. 1246, is clear, however, that benefits for families of lesbian and gay servicemembers are not up for consideration: “Nothing in this Act . . . shall be construed to require the furnishing of dependent benefits in violation of . . . the `Defense of Marriage Act.’”

Hillary Clinton has already agreed to provide same-sex partners of State Department employees with the same benefits and protections as opposite-sex spouses. President Obama has said he will work to repeal DOMA, but has not yet set a timetable.

Let me stress, therefore : We need to stay focused on repealing DADT and not try to work in broader family rights for lesbian and gay servicemembers right now. As much as it hurts to read the DOMA clause in the anti-DADT legislation, it seems a prudent move at this point in order for the measure to have any chance of success.

At the same time, we should be mindful that family rights for military personnel will be an upcoming challenge—and perhaps an opportunity. The repeal of DADT could highlight the need to enact federal relationship-recognition and adoption rights for every American, if only to ensure that all servicemembers have equal benefits for their families.

In 2007, senior Army leaders, and leaders of every Army installation worldwide publicly signed the Army Family Covenant, a pledge to support soldiers’ families. It says in part, “We recognize the strength of our Soldiers comes from the strength of their Families.”

If we are to remain the world’s strongest military power, therefore, we must support the families of all servicemembers. Once DADT is no more, we can do no less.

Dana Rudolph is the founder and publisher of Mombian, a blog and resource directory for LGBT parents. Her column exploring the intersection of politics and parenting appears every other Thursday at 365gay.com.


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • SteveMD2 Said: February 22nd, 2009 at 4:09 am
    • One of the leaders of the support DADT is a woman named Donnely. Looking at her name, it is almost certain that she rims the Pope daily to get her marching orders.

      And what they fear is that all those conservative boys from the south who are in the army will suddenly discover that that gays are good people, and they can trust them with their lives, which is what the army is about – everyone working for a common purpose, and supporting each other.

      The only funny thing about their fear is that there are so many gay people out in the army, and polls say that 73% of the troops are fine with having out gay comrades.

      Someday they will write about our time, probably sooner rather then later. And the book will be called “Civilization?”

  • AW Said: February 14th, 2009 at 10:00 am
    • There are more obstacles than just repealing DADT. May of the family and social services available to military personnel have been contracted out to civilian providers that have ties to conservative religious organizations. During the past couple of decades, the military has become very strongly influenced by these groups. Its going to take a lot of time and effort to give GLBT personnel fair and equitable access to these services after the repeal is passed. It won’t be easy.

  • Brian Said: February 13th, 2009 at 11:48 am
    • Do not expect this to happen during the Obama administration due to his defense appointments thus far. Even if the house/senate dems push for it, the administration will make sure it gets burried. Based upon his choices and actions, if DADT is repealed it will be as a way of providing reparitive therapy to the gay soldiers, probably instituted by his WH office of faith based initiatives. I feel sorry for any LGBT that is still expecting “change”.

  • Dana Said: February 13th, 2009 at 9:15 am
    • Todd: To my knowledge, current proposals to repeal DADT also would add a policy of non-discrimination based on sexual orientation–but it’s still all up in the air until it comes to a final vote.

  • Todd Said: February 13th, 2009 at 3:59 am
    • When they talk about repealing DADT do they mean the armed forces policy regarding homosexuality in it’s entirety or just DADT?

  • Dave in Ohio Said: February 13th, 2009 at 12:01 am
    • I agree. I believe the only reason this was ban was created is to simply deny us the right to marriage. Because it is really hard for anyone to argue the fact that if a person can risk their life to defend our country shouldn’t that very same person have the right to recieve every right that our country has to offer.

  • Dana Said: February 12th, 2009 at 9:38 pm
    • JJ: I used “LGBT” at the beginning of this article because I do believe that repealing DADT “is a necessary and important step towards equality for LGBT Americans.” As I said, however, it is only the first step, not the only one–but that doesn’t make my above statement any less accurate. I hope that it is indeed followed by legislation that clearly permits any otherwise qualified American to serve, regardless of sexual orientation OR gender identity. I do use “lesbian and gay” later in the piece when I am more specifically referring to sexual orientation.

  • jose-vera Said: February 12th, 2009 at 9:30 pm
    • Bob, ah Wow ” Why hasn’t Obama repealed DADT, DOMA yet”? In three weeks?Not even the economic stimulus package has passed. And you actually answer your own question bro “If republicans are giving him a hard time about the stimulus, what about DADT, ENDA, DOMA”?

  • CArolyne Said: February 12th, 2009 at 9:22 pm
    • OK Bob,
      I want the guy to repeal all those anti-gay policies, but your post? ahhhhhhh well…. I hope most of us don’t see things from your point of view.

  • Andy Said: February 12th, 2009 at 9:20 pm
    • My partner and I are holding out, hoping he will move in due time. I will give him (POTUS) the benefit of the doubt, that he is working under the pressures that are inherent in changing a major policy. However, I will not stay in this service forever, while I sacrifice my relationship for the “comfort of others.”

  • JJ in Chicago Said: February 12th, 2009 at 9:19 pm
    • Why do you say “LGBT” service members?

      DADT involves sexual orientation, not gender identity.

      Therefore, please use the words gay and lesbian and drop the politically expedient and joined-at-the-hip term “LGBT”.

  • Bob Said: February 12th, 2009 at 8:58 pm
    • Why has Barack not yet repealed DADT and DOMA? He is busy fixing the economy. I am not concerned about the economy,I am an upper middle class hard working guy. Why is He campaigning for the poor and not the gay?The way the republicans are giving him hell passing the stimulus, I wonder how hard the republicans will fight against repealing DADT, ENDA. Obama should be selling the gay issues like He is selling the stimulus.

  • Larry Rape Said: February 12th, 2009 at 6:06 pm
    • Don’t hold your breath, anybody. So far, he has hinted only about gay rights–and only when campaigning. Barack the Uncertain has yet to deliver!

  • LOrion Said: February 12th, 2009 at 5:12 pm
    • Good column. Think we’ll get it done… all in a row, because these very questions will come up. Lets see how State handles it, as it is not done yet.

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook