Neff: Watch the tape, see the hate
Watch the tape, see the hate
by Lisa Neff
The security camera didn’t provide much security for Jack Price, beaten by two men on a Queens, N.Y., street early Oct. 9.But the security camera captured the crime — for three minutes two men punched and kicked Price, 49, who was on the ground for most of the assault.
And the video — first made public by WABC, a Queens ABC affiliate — may help authorities put two men in jail for assault, aggravated assault as a hate crime and aggravated harassment.
Jack Price is gay. And apparently his assailants knew that.
They encountered Price outside a neighborhood grocery, shouted anti-gay slurs at him.
The taunts picked up again as Price left the grocery to make his way to his nearby home.
Then the beating began.
Watch the tape, see the hate.
Two men chase another in the street on the blue-tinted tape. The assailants push and punch the third man to the ground. The victim tries to stand, but is held down by his attackers, who continue to punch and kick him as they hold him on the pavement.
The victim roles toward the curb, trying to protect himself, but the blows continue against his head, his stomach, his back.
With the victim lying on the ground, the two assailants appear to shout, pointing their fingers at Price’s head, then unleash more blows.
The attackers turn away, but then turn back to take something from the victim’s pockets. Robbery was not a motive
A car drives past, just a few away from the two men standing over the victim, but never slows.
More blows.
Then the attackers leave, talking with another, and the victim rises from the ground and stumbles away, out of the camera’s range.
Price suffered a broken jaw, a lacerated spleen, fractured ribs and collapsed lungs.
When the public learned of the assault, he had been placed into a medically induced coma and was breathing with the aid of a respirator at New York Hospital Queens.
On Oct. 12 — 11 years to the day after gay college student Matthew Shepard died, the victim of two men who tricked him away from a bar and savagely beat him on the outskirts of Laramie, Wyo. — New York City officials gathered to denounce the attack on Price, the LGBT community and the good people of Queens.
“I know the Queens community is outraged that hate has tainted their streets,” said New York City Council Speaker Christine C. Quinn.
“This is the fourth time in 19 years that a gay man in Queens lies near death, or actually died, because he was beaten for being gay,” said Queens resident Daniel Dromm.
New York Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly called the assault “despicable” and vowed that the city would not tolerate the intolerance.
This week, the U.S. Senate is expected to take up a vote on a defense bill — reconciled through conference with the House — that includes, as an amendment, the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Act.
In anticipation of the Senate vote, I received press releases and action alerts from groups and lawmakers on both sides of the hate crimes issue.
Opponents and proponents of the hate crimes provision referred to the assault on Price as reason to vote up or down on the bill.
The opponents’ argument: Two men were arrested and face criminal charges. The system already works.
The proponents’ argument: Two men — Daniel Aleman and Daniel Rodriguez — were arrested and may face hate crimes charges in New York. But New York is one of only 31 states with a hate crimes law that includes sexual orientation and one of only 12 states with a hate crimes law that includes gender identity.
The proponents’ argument, which readers here probably know is the one I accept, continues: Passage of the hate crimes measure would help local authorities secure federal assistance to investigate and prosecute an anti-gay crime.
And add to the argument: Passage of the hate crimes measure would authorize the U.S. Justice Department to intervene in a bias-motivated case where local authorities refuse to act.
It is worth noting that Virginia is the home state of one of the two suspects in the Price assault.
It is worth nothing that Virginia law does not address hate crimes based on sexual orientation, nor does Virginia law does not address hate crimes based on gender identity.
Virginia is where, in April 2000, a teenager, motivated by anti-gay bias, beat another teenager with a metal pipe. Virginia is where, in a gay bar in September 2000, a gay man was killed and six others were shot. Virginia is where, in September 2002, a university student was assaulted on his way to an LGBT group meeting. Virginia is where, in May 2005, a teenager was beaten at a party because of his sexual orientation. Virginia is where, in July 2005, a church was the target of an arson attack after its national body adopted a pro-gay marriage resolution.
Virginia is where, in October 2009, we know federal hate crimes law must be expanded.
And I hope, 11 years after the Shepard murder, we know nationwide we must expand the law.





Jeff, I like how you can still be sarcastic and ideologically fixated when it’s not you getting your head split open on a curb. It’s the hubris that’s offensive, the effort to hold your ideology as somehow more significant than a brutal assault.
Thirty-ish years ago, the Equal Rights Amendment died in the Illinois Legislature. The Constitution protects the rights of all “men.” Doesn’t mention women. That’s inferred, yes? Obvious inference? No it’s not–and more than once, some social troglodyte has gotten away with paying women less for the same work, or charging them more for a product or service, simply because there’s not a black-letter inclusion of women in the Constitution.
The same tactic was used with blacks. You don’t like government; I don’t really give a shit. It angers the hell out of me that a parsing of the Constitution has all too often been the open path for one American to deny another their civil rights. In fact, it’s the very cunning of people like them–people who are not far from you ideologically–that generates the necessity for laws that specifically include women, or visible minorities. Or gays.
Jack Price is an American who has the inalienable right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. He was going to the store, not on some adventure to the heart of darkness. All of us have the RIGHT to live unmolested. Or at least we should, but all too often, it’s people like you who parse legal texts and conclude that if the alleged victim is not specifically protected by the law, then there was no crime. You really think anyone here would take you seriously if you suggested that Price’s attack had nothing to do with him being gay?
Life’s funny, Jeff. You need to check yourself, because the arrogance of your comments is too much of an invitation for the universe to show you that you aren’t nearly as aloof and wise as you like to think. I hope it doesn’t happen to any of us here, not you or me or anyone, but you’re so full of shit that you don’t seem to understand that it COULD BE YOU. And your dislike of legislation which seems to confer “special rights” is your thoroughgoing denial that it takes those “special” laws just to get the same protection of Constitutional rights that at middle-aged white Republican on a golf course has taken for granted all his life.
Three minutes is a *long* time when you’re being beaten.
well just maybe if the churches would stop preaching hate. the hate would stop its the root of it!
Jeffrey, I don’t see hate crimes laws actually ending hate crimes. However, when crimes do occur, these laws will ensure that people are more likely to be investigated, solved, and prosecuted by allocating more resources to the problem in the form of funds, personnel, and dedicated laws that can be used to prosecute.
Furthermore, I expect that such laws break defenses like “gay panic” since, in using such a defense, you are essentially admitting guilt under them. (Maybe Robert Hannah wouldn’t have gotten off with a mere 180 days for *killing* someone on the admitted basis of his sexual orientation.)
These laws can also be used to create harsher sentences that will incline people convicted under them to think harder before repeating the offense and keep them behind bars longer so that they have less opportunity to do so. Maybe it’ll make their friends (who probably share a mindset) think twice too.
Finally, it sends the message that hate crimes are not tolerated; just as these crimes terrorize their respective groups, these laws send a counter message that if you terrorize people, you *will* be punished for it.
I apologize. This would have NEVER happened if there was a federal law too. Mucho apoligiesies for being too dense to realize that TWO laws will solve the problem.
Not for nothing, but NY has a hate crimes law and it still happened. Maybe we should put the emphasis on crime prevention rather than after the fact.
Yes a fed law is nessasary to stop the whole sale slaughter,harrasment,& sexural assult! Just like they fed laws had to be used in the blacks civil rights to protect them & to inforce the CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS.
OUR CIVIL RIGHTS ALSO MUST BE PROTECTED!
What is good for one State is good for all States, and federal protections for ALL Americans is in the best interest of this entire Country which should be there no matter what the State laws are. I live in Texas, and we could sure use some federal protections for our GLBT citizens. Grammy