November 22nd, 2009
 

365 Gay: Opinion

Neff: Bringing the policy home, bringing the policy down

, columnist, 365gay.com

With nearly 150 representatives co-sponsoring a bill to repeal “don’t ask, don’t tell,” with more than 100 retired admirals and generals supporting repeal, and with about 75 percent of the U.S. public wanting the government to lift the ban, you might think the policy doomed.

But we are in our seventh month of probably a 20-month window of opportunity to discharge “don’t ask, don’t tell” into the exosphere, and we have not yet gained enough momentum.

So a road show began last week, a military-themed tour, but not of the old USO variety that Bob Hope and the Andrews Sisters used to headline. The headliners on the Voices of Honor tour include Congressman Patrick Murphy, D-Pa., who served in Iraq and is a member of Servicemembers United, and Eric Alva, the first servicemember wounded in the Iraq War; Jarrod Chlapowski, a former U.S. Army Korean linguist who decided not to re-enlist because he could no longer abide the forced lies, and Alex Nicholson, a former U.S. Army linguist discharged under the policy.

These military veterans – gay and straight – are sharing the first-hand stories about the personal pain and the national harm the military ban causes. The veterans will bring home the ramifications of the policy to muster the voices to bring down “don’t ask, don’t tell.”

How can we aid these veterans in the campaign?

We can bring the issue home to the workplace.

Many of us work without domestic partner benefits or even protection from discrimination based on sexual orientation, but we are not – by force of law or even employee policy – required to lie about our lives to our co-workers and bosses. The U.S. military must be the only employer in the country that explicitly requires such. To not lie can cost a gay servicemember his or her job, career, health and education benefits. To not lie can even cost a gay servicemember his or her freedom.

Talk about “don’t ask, don’t tell” the next time you are at work. If “don’t ask, don’t tell” were put into effect in your workplace today, would you still have your job tomorrow? Would your closest colleague?

Talk about how it would it feel to walk past the employee bulletin board in the cafeteria or outside the bathrooms and notice a newly posted memo that reads, “New regulations on homosexual conduct.”

The memo – similar to the one issued by the Defense Department with the implementation of “don’t ask, don’t tell” 15 years ago – states, “Sexual orientation is considered a personal and private matter, and homosexual orientation is not a bar to service entry or continued, service unless manifested by homosexual conduct.”

The memo further states, “The three bases for separation are homosexual acts, same sex marriages, and statements by an individual that he or she is a homosexual or bisexual. In the latter case, the individual has the opportunity to rebut the presumption of homosexual acts by demonstrating that he or she does not engage in homosexual acts and does not have a propensity or intent to do so.”

What does your employer mean by “conduct” and “activity”?

Talk about how it would feel to open an e-mail message on an office computer to find a directive from your supervisor to attend an all-employee meeting on the new policy. And how it would feel to sit next to co-workers as the boss explains the rigors of the job, the importance of teamwork, good order and discipline and then here the boss proclaim, “Persons who demonstrate a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion.”

Furthermore, your boss explains, any employee who “attempted to engage in, or solicited another to engage in a homosexual act or acts” or “has stated that he or she is a homosexual or bisexual, or words to that effect” shall be fired.

Servicemembers are the nation’s defenders, but they also are employees.

“Don’t ask, don’t tell” is bad military policy – our veterans will deliver that message this summer.

“Don’t ask, don’t’ tell” is an un-American policy – our civil rights advocates will deliver that message this summer.

And “don’t ask, don’t tell” is bad employment policy – we can deliver that message to many this summer.


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • Joe Said: July 22nd, 2009 at 12:32 am
    • I am a linguist currently serving in the U.S. military. Next June will mark my 10th year of enlistment at which point I plan to reenlist. After June of 2010 I plan to start bringing my boyfriend to unit functions where spouses and significant others are commonly present. It is up to all of you how the rest of this scenario plays out. Please do not relent. There are tens of thousands like me who need your support.

  • Jay Said: July 21st, 2009 at 8:16 am
    • bryanKCMO and joysmith: you both make excellent points. We need ENDA as well as the repeal of DADT. Because the military has tried to make homosexuality “unspeakable,” they have in effect tied the tongues of military personnel so the heavy lifting must be done by civilians. What I don’t understand is why we are such wusses. This policy is outrageous and the large majority of citizens oppose it. It should be easy to get rid of it. But Obama is weak. He so wants to be loved by the generals that he is not willing to do anything. And our leaders are equally timid. There should be civil disobedience, direct action, demonstrations at recruiting stations and on college campuses against this absurd policy. And yet all we have are press conferences. Maybe we deserve being second-class citizens. So many of us are comfortable sitting in the back of the bus.

  • joy smith Said: July 17th, 2009 at 11:39 am
    • I try to talk about it all I can. Yet, as I working in the Army I can only say so much. Soldiers who wish to speack out about DADT risk much. We have no voice. All of you must voice this for us.

  • bryanKCMO Said: July 17th, 2009 at 11:02 am
    • “Many of us work without domestic partner benefits or even protection from discrimination based on sexual orientation, but we are not – by force of law or even employee policy – required to lie about our lives to our co-workers and bosses.”

      Many of us do have to lie or risk losing our jobs. Where I live there is no law saying my boss cant fire me because I’m gay. And every boss I’ve had is the conservative white male religious type that wouldnt hesitate to fire someone based on their sexual orientation. Repealing DADT is extremely important but so is passing a ENDA so that the rest of us can work and live without fear of being fired. We need legislation to protect ALL of our community.

  • Sarrellec Said: July 17th, 2009 at 10:53 am
    • With all of the support as listed in this article, WHY are we still having to mount this kind of pressure?
      Because we no longer have any control of our government and they’re going to do whatever makes them the most money from the richest people.
      That’s it.
      Our government has been bought. They (Senators and Representatives) freely admit that they will do what the lobbyists who own them tell them to do.
      It used to be called “graft”.
      Now, it’s just business as usual.

  • Joy M. Said: July 17th, 2009 at 7:39 am
    • I’m taking my hat off to our gay veterans. I’m shaking my head at our elected officials. Just do it. We go to war with less thought than these people pass a bill.

  • Lisa W. Said: July 17th, 2009 at 7:38 am
    • I hope and pray we don’t blow our moment. If we wait too long to repeal this policy, we’ll be into general election fever. Obama will be campaigning again in 2011. We have to act by then.

  • Berta S. Said: July 17th, 2009 at 7:36 am
    • I talked over the policy with my cubicle mates this morning. What an exhilerating way to start the day. And important.

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook