November 21st, 2009
 

365 Gay: Opinion

Besen: Wingnuts strike again

, columnist, 365gay.com

Fresh off its wing nut wingding on the National Mall, the far-out fringe held its “Values Voter” summit in Washington last week.

The highlight was jilted former Miss California, Carrie Prejean, starting a brand new religion — “MEvangelical Christianity.” In her remarkably self-centered, narcissistic speech, she cast herself as a martyr on a mission and repeatedly had to remind the audience that she wasn’t as stuck up as she appeared on stage.

Prejean’s introspective idolatry was almost outdone by Michael Schwartz, the chief of staff for Sen. Tom Coburn. For those who do not remember, Coburn is the Oklahoma Republican who once criticized the movie Schindler’s List for its nudity.

Thank God for our watchdog, Senator Coburn, or lusting after malnourished and gaunt holocaust victims might have caught on.

With a mentor like Coburn, it was only natural for Schwartz to become an expert on pornography, and we were fortunate to have him share his wisdom at a Values Voter discussion on “The New Masculinity.”

On the cusp of insulting gay people, Schwartz told the rabid right crowd that he was about to get “politically incorrect.” Why bother with a disclaimer, as if gay bashing is actually controversial at such rallies? If he really wanted to shock the crowd, he would have introduced “Schwartz’ List” – naming all the social conservatives caught in tawdry sex scandals.

But, alas he only had an hour, clearly not enough time for this endeavor.

Schwartz called pornography a “blight” and a “disease”. Although he failed to point out it disproportionally afflicts Republicans, with “Red States” having the highest rates of pornography subscriptions.

The porno politico then agreed with an “ex-gay” friend of his that said, “‘All pornography is homosexual pornography because all pornography turns your sexual drive inwards.’ Now think about that. And if you, if you tell an 11-year-old boy about that, do you think he’s going to want to go out and get a copy of Playboy? I’m pretty sure he’ll lose interest. That’s the last thing he wants.’ You know, that’s a, that’s a good comment. It’s a good point and it’s a good thing to teach young people.”

So, straight porn will turn you gay and holocaust nudity is erotic. Just plain, homespun common sense.

Now that the loons have finally left DC, there is the question of whether the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community should march on Washington. The main event is scheduled for October 11th and it is highly anticipated by a new breed of Internet-age activists.

There is, however, opposition from many local GLBT organizations and movement activists who believe that resources spent in Washington would be put to better use fighting battles in the states.

I am highly sympathetic to statewide leaders who have performed heroic work, even though they lack crucial resources. And they are correct that the GLBT movement needs to continue fighting and educating at the local level.

fThis will not only bring us victory in the states, but will change the facts on the ground in congressional districts, increasing the chance Congress will vote for equality.

Still, I agree with Equality Across America organizer Cleve Jones and long-time activist David Mixner that now is the time to go to Washington. No matter how much state organizers would prefer we march on state capitols, it is not the same. A rally in sleepy towns like Tallahassee or Albany changes your afternoon plans, while a trip to DC changes your life.

Detractors of the big march say that not enough organizing has been done to lobby members of Congress. But, what exactly would these citizen-lobbyists say that has not already been said by Human Rights Campaign lobbyists 1,000 times before? Besides, those who come to DC can always lobby the Representative in their district when they return home.

The march is really about inspiring a new generation. One of the highlights of my young activism career was attending the 1993 March on Washington. It moved me to a lifetime of advocacy and I believe that today’s youth deserve the same opportunity I got to come to DC and be counted.

Let’s not be jaded and forget how mesmerizing it was to step on the lawn and witness a sea of homosexuals and their allies campaigning for equal rights. I think those who oppose the march should close their eyes and relive the experience.

This march will likely be smaller than those in the past due to the economic recession. It will likely not spur an overnight legislative victory. But, it will invigorate and initiate a fire inside thousands of activists that will burn long after the last candle is blown out on the National Mall. And, as a bonus, compared to the crazies who marched last week, a gay pride march will finally seem positively boring.


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • Elloreigh Said: September 24th, 2009 at 10:47 am
    • Alex said: “The importance of a march like this isn’t that it can change things in itself, but it shows that we are here, and it shows what we are willing to do.”

      Which is important why exactly? They know we’re here. Knowing one of us personally is a lot more likely to have a positive impact on someone’s views towards LGBTs than the images they see of total strangers marching, partying, etc. Rest assured, the media will focus on the most sensational people they can locate, not on the issues. It’s for that very reason that the Pride parades have become such a lightening rod.

      That said, it’s become clear that even knowing us personally has little to no impact on many who hold anti-gay beliefs – because beliefs are unfortunately a stronger influence than facts. They have no problem at all saying they ‘love’ us while doing the most hateful things they can to interfere in our lives. A march will have little impact on that situation.

      As for what we are willing to do, we should be applying that will toward the things that make a difference and promote change, not on mere visibility.

  • Burton Bagby-Grose Said: September 24th, 2009 at 12:52 am
    • Wayne – using terms like “wingnuts” just drags you down in the mud with those you criticize.
      We must continue to foster civility in order to maintain productive discussion and interaction.
      I know you can do better.

  • Wayne M. Said: September 23rd, 2009 at 8:51 pm
    • While it is a fact that not everyone can be in Washington for the march, it is a fact that everyone can do some kind of local and/or personal action for LGBT equality on that weekend. For those in the poll who say they wish they could be there but cannot go, then do something from your home. IF WE DON’T ACT, THEN WE CAN KISS MARRIAGE EQUALITY, HATE CRIMES LAWS, AND LAWS AGAINST DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE AND ACCOMMODATION GOOD BYE! We may even have to kiss ending DADT good-bye. So get off your duff and do something!

  • Alex Said: September 23rd, 2009 at 7:00 pm
    • The importance of a march like this isn’t that it can change things in itself, but it shows that we are here, and it shows what we are willing to do. I can’t make it, I’m a poor busy college kid, but everyone who can, should, and everyone who thinks it’s a waste of time, think about this. In the age of the internet where we can all sit back and say whatever we want in the anonymity of the internet, and watch everything we want on tv, just getting out of the house to go to something like this makes a huge statement. The republicans do so much damage because they can organize and act in a united way. They can get people out there to get in the way of everything. Bill Mar said it at the end of one of his shows, the republicans go out to shout at senators in town hall meetings, we sit in our homes and shout at the tv. Which one seems more effective? Staying close to home and fighting personal battles in lieu of larger fights will not get us anywhere. This IS a fight, and fights take sacrifice.

  • cdnair Said: September 23rd, 2009 at 4:51 pm
    • lol, americans. I’m sorry, and I do treat people as individuals, I really do, but people like this- entire conventions like this make it really hard to take anyone seriously. History books are going to look like an utter joke “Look how far we’ve come, yet people still talk about ‘teh bad pr0nz’ and ‘teh turnin to thuh lawd fo fixin teh ghey’”

      Unreal.

  • Elloreigh Said: September 23rd, 2009 at 4:40 pm
    • I was also at the 1993 March. While I’ll agree it was a moving personal experience, I wouldn’t describe it as life-altering, nor would I say that it translated into positive, lasting change for the LGBT communities. We still ended up with the federal DOMA and DADT shortly thereafter.

      In my opinion this March is a waste of resources, and more likely to be used against us than to produce positive, lasting change for our communities. Much like the 1993 March.

      A national march on Washington D.C. is highly unlikely to change things in a state like Michigan, which has no anti-discrimination law protecting LGBT folk, and which has banned ANY form of civil recognition for our marriages.

      If you want to promote change, do it one person at a time, where you live. A big party in Washington D.C. isn’t the way to accomplish it, even if it is being organized by Cleve Jones.

  • JerryM70 Said: September 23rd, 2009 at 4:11 pm
    • In 1963 Asa Philip Randolph had an idea for a march on Washington to promote jobs and freedom for black people. Interestingly enough it was Bayard Rustin an openly gay black man who was responsible for organizing that march. Martin Luther King Jr. was scheduled to address the crowd. “I have a dream…” wasn’t the core of the march’s goal, but it changed the way America works and it changed it for the better.

      No one should be allowed to say that a peaceful march is of no value. No one has the ability to foretell what can result from a gathering.

      I don’t have to worry about going to the march, I live here in the city so I’ll be there. A fat old white guy who gasps ans wheezes when he has to walk very far, but I’ll be there.

  • fwilms Said: September 23rd, 2009 at 1:00 pm
    • It’s always a good time to fight for our equal rights. Let’s MARCH!!

  • Draigh Lunara Said: September 23rd, 2009 at 12:06 pm
    • Of course the Right-Wing Lunatic Fringe is talking the loudest and craziest. I wonder if you had a list of the people who attended that weekend are also on the list of the march in DC that occured a short time ago. These two groups are becoming increasingly harder to separate and distinguish from each other.
      May Goddess Bless Those Who Learn and Grow!
      Blessed Be!
      Rev. Draigh Lunara

  • Lenworth Poyser Said: September 23rd, 2009 at 12:05 pm
    • Who are these gay organizations who aren’t going to support the march? They need to support us just because were gay and the march is something positive, end of discussion. There’s no way this march is going to make matters worse. Marches always empower the groups of people who participate in them, and teach valuable lessons to those observing.

  • DaveW Said: September 23rd, 2009 at 11:07 am
    • I’m glad we are marching. I agree with Mr. Besen on the 1993 march which I attended with my then and current partner. It was amazing to see that many people…especially the youth groups from the center of the country, I was really surprised to see them.

      Unfortunately this time it turns out I’ll be out of the country by my thoughts will be there.

      I want to comment, however, on the Couric interview with Beck. They only showed a snippet during the prime time news (and I’m not awake for when they air the whole thing…do people who work full days getting up before dawn actually stay up that late?????).

      She said to him that his position on gay marriage is the same as Obama’s correct? He said yes. That was it.

      Does Mrs. Couric, like much of our community, erroneaously assume Obama supports marriage equality (why can’t she use the correct term???)? And if Mr. Beck also makes that incorrect assumption, does he therefore support marriage equality?

      I know where Obama is and have always known but for some reason people keep saying he supports equality which he never has and never has said he does. He supports civil unions if you had to get an answer but rather supports the states deciding so as a federal employee has no opinion, according to his position.

      so does Beck support states deciding? And therefore is he against DOMA.

      He is being touted as a libertarian. Small government, stay out of our lives. So he should support marriage equality. But he also said he is against abortion which is not a libertarian view.

      I know his tactics are awful and he is an entertainer that wants to stir up his audience with statements like Obama is a racist. I don’t support him but his stated politics, except for the abortion hypocrisy, aligns with me.

      No graduated income tax
      No death tax
      Abortion rights
      marriage rights
      small government
      no capital gains tax
      limited social net

      I guess where I differ is healthcare. Like education and fire protection I think it is a government service. So I’m not a very good libertarian, I guess.

      But my question goes unanswered…..are we in this twilight zone of alternate reality in which everyone thinks Obama supports marriage equality (the teabaggers think so according to their signs)?

      Or, as is accurate, were Beck and Couric referring to the states rights position of let the states decide?

      The media do us a disservice with unclear messages like this.

  • Ballston Said: September 23rd, 2009 at 10:03 am
    • I live in the DC area but wasn’t planning to attend the march. However, after Obama’s latest defense of anti-gay legislation (DOMA) I am seriously considering attending. Perhaps a visible show of our numbers will in itself have an impact just as “Freedom Village” did in the ’60s.

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook