Besen: The changing face of the GOP
It would be wrong to say that the majority of Republicans are racist. But, it is fair to say that racists have comfortably nested in the GOP for quite some time. Since President Richard Nixon employed his infamous “Southern Strategy,” bigots, xenophobes and homophobes have been sought after Republican constituencies.
Beginning in the late 1960’s and extending through the present day, the GOP reframed its racism, branding itself “conservative.” A word that once stood for small government came to stand for small minds that voted in large numbers. This new political deformity hid its hatred behind calls for “states rights” and “personal responsibility.” (To be fair, in the early days, many Democrats were also segregationists)
Notorious Republican dirty tricks artist, the late Lee Atwater, explained the party’s tactics.
“You start out in 1954 by saying, “N*****, n*****, n*****,” said Atwater. “By 1968 you can’t say ‘n*****’ — that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states’ rights and all that stuff. You’re getting so abstract now [that] you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites.”
In a stunning repudiation of its recent history, the Republican Party elected Maryland Lt. Governor Michael Steele, who is African American, as its chairman. He defeated a repugnant, nose-holding cluster of clowns, including Katon Dawson, head of the South Carolina GOP, who had recently quit his membership in an all-white country club, and Chip Saltsman, the Tennessee party leader who handed out a Christmas CD that featured the song, “Barack the Magic Negro.”
Sure, it took more than five hours and six ballots for Steele to win. The outcome shows, however, that many GOP leaders understand that the party must change or face continued failure at the ballot box. Of course, Steele’s ascension does raise serious questions: Will white supremacists continue to support a party that is led by a black man? If they do exit the party, will a new, reformed GOP be able to attract enough new voters to replace them?
To answer the first question, former Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke sent out a press release headlined, “To Hell with the Republican Party,” and said that, “GOP traitors appoint Obama Junior as Chairman of the Republican Party.”
Steele tried to answer the second question by saying, “We’re going to bring this party to every corner, every boardroom, every neighborhood, every community.”
Every community? Does this mean we should expect to see official GOP booths at Gay Pride?
The Stonewall Democrats don’t seem to think so. The group stressed that as Lt. Governor, “Steele made himself a public advocate for the Alliance for Marriage, a radical anti-marriage group which initiated efforts to pass a federal constitutional amendment to bar same-sex couples the freedom to marry.” In 2005, Steele also “headlined a ‘Defend Marriage Rally.’”
While this is not encouraging, it is clear that in its selection of Steele, the GOP was not simply looking to replace racism with homophobia by selecting the most anti-gay black candidate they could find. If that were the case, they could have chosen former Ohio Secretary of State, Kenneth Blackwell, who once compared gay people to “arsonists and kleptomaniacs.”
So, it is clear that the GOP chose to embark upon a strategy to win back mainstream voters and Independents, rather than simply pander to the Bible thumping base.
The big question the mainstream media is afraid to ask is: Will Steele’s election sour the Party’s relationship with the Religious Right?
While most social conservatives are not racist, it would be naive to deny a connection exists. Indeed, a map of GOP strongholds is essentially a map of the old confederacy – which happens to be called “The Bible Belt.”
In 2001, the Family Research Council’s Tony Perkins addressed the Council of Conservative Citizens, which was formed as the successor organization to the White Citizens Council. The Nation magazine claimed that in 1996, Perkins paid David Duke $82,000 for use of his mailing list.
The most powerful man on the right is Rush Limbaugh, widely known for his racial insensitivity. And, let’s not forget the former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott, who stepped down from his leadership position after he was broadly criticized for toasting, a little too enthusiastically, the career of segregationist Strom Thurmond.
To rebuild the GOP, Steele will have to choose between the inclusive Big Tent and the intolerant Big Steeple. The religious right won’t accept a party that supports even modest rights for gay people, while moderate and younger voters will never trust a party that is anti-gay. The sooner Steele realizes that to get Republicans elected, social conservatives must be ejected from the party – the quicker he will be able to save the GOP.




Hopefully he will bring some changes to the party but to automatically assume he’ just some token Uncle Tom, sounds racist to em.
PLus the Democratic party has their own history of racism and Klan Members. It was the Dems that were gainst desegregation in the first place. It was a dem predient to signed into law DOMA and DADT. SO before you start throwing stones, you should start cleaning your own glass house.
The current pres. doesn’t support equality for gay americans but he gets a pass
It’s another paranoid delusional rant by Wayne Besen. I think we should embrace the LGBT community provided they submit to MRI polygraphs for the necessary statistical data and scientific studies that has been suppressed by the liberal bodies of the APA(s) and the ABA since the revision of the ALIMPC in 1955. If the data supports their positions, I wholeheartedly support their view to provide for the normalization of neurotic behavior and its associated paraphilias to children and lowering the age of consent to 12 as Justice Ginsgurg has suggested. I’d even support the antisocial behavior of neurotic legal and medical professionals to knowingly place children in borderline caretaker environments, regardless of the gender or socioeconomic status of the caretaker environment.
Steele is to Obama what Palin was to Clinton. As I was offended that the GOP offered Palin as a substitute women could vote for, I am offended that Republicans think putting a black man at the head of the GOP is going to show that the party has turned a corner toward inclusion and diversity. Give me a break. You can’t cancel out your history of racism, sexism and homophobia by “matching” the genders and races of our leaders. You believe straight white guys should continue to rule the world and we all know that.
I didn’t think much of the new leader until right now.
This is kind of awesome, actually..
The republicans are estranging some of the biggest bigots from its party, which will force them to be even more inclusive to make up for the lost votes. That leaves them to focus on the old tenant of smaller government. The current economic environment makes it impossible to be a proponent of deregulation anymore. That really forces them in the direction of trying to be smart regulation with limited government.
If they lose the conservatives that want to bud into our personal lives, maybe the republicans can become a party that we don’t have to hate.
Will the black community be impressed by this blatant display of tokenism? Would gays be impressed if one of the Log Cabin republicans had gotten the position? I doubt it. Neither Uncle Tom nor Uncle Bruce is going to convince me that the republicans have any intention of making fundamental changes.
overheard at a conservative dinner table
Those there deemoncrats done gone n got a negra
We gots to gets us one of dem there negras
just kidding, of course
I wouldn’t read too much into Steele’s selection as GOP party leader. Keep in mind that the this is not a parliamentary democracy. The party leader is not expected to head the government at any point. Their job is more about managing the fund-raising and cutting the back office deals that result in the selection of actual candidates.
On Election Night the root cause of McCain’s defeat was visible on TV. The crowd at his concession speech was so white that it could have just as easily been an Aryan Nations rally. Obama’s crowd, in sharp contrast, was a mix of all races.
The GOP knows that going forward they’re going to need to show some more pigment or else be faced with an ever-dwindling share of the voter pie. So they’re cultivating more diversity in order to try and win back votes from demographics that might be suspicious that they’re a bunch of closet Klan members. Hence Steele gaining the party post and their decision to actively try and raise the profile of people like Louisiana governor Bobby Jindal (an Indian) or Sarah Palin (a woman). It’s all to break down their Old White Boys Club image.
Will this lead to a crackup with the Religious Right? I doubt it. They’ll hold their noses and continue to support the party as long as it promotes a conservative social agenda and as long as they don’t try to put too many non-whites up front. A real challenge would come to the fore if Jindal tried to run for president in 2012. He’s a religious conservative, which helps him. But many white conservatives outside of Louisiana might have a hard time backing him. This is why I suspect Romney is being cultivated. He’s essentially already started his campaign, bashing Obama even though the latter has only been president a few weeks, and touting his own ideas.
But lest we get complacent, keep in mind that the Democrats are every bit as fractious as the Republicans. Pelosi and Reid are already trying to flex their muscles against Obama. And the Left wing of the party is becoming increasingly restive in the face of the growing power of Center and Center-Right Democrats.
All of this is the inevitable consequence of having only two major political parties in a country this size. Both parties are schizophrenic masses of often mutually antagonistic factions that are only together because they know they could never control the government if they broke up into smaller parties. Remember how quickly Buchannon’s Right-wing annexation of the Reform Party fizzled out? It was a brief gasp of rebellion and then everyone quietly slinked back to the GOP.
Thanks for the intelligent view, Wayne. I think the media has much more to do with the direction of any party now. Ratings determine policy. Sad but true. This doesn’t bode well for our human rights any time soon. Even Obama backed away from marriage as a civil right for LGBT people. The mob will be poor and angry for years to come. The challenge for LGBT people will be avoiding becoming scapegoats and losing the gains we have made. It is no time to feel secure with either party. It is time to strive for solidarity in our own communities by supporting our own institutions and those who do step foreward for our rights with loud protests, placards and visible feet on the pavement.
“To rebuild the GOP, Steele will have to choose between the inclusive Big Tent and the intolerant Big Steeple. ”
Oh well said. This is going to be very interesting..
When the GOP embraced the Moral Majority and other conservative groups in the 1970’s, they made a pact with the devil. Now its time to pay up.
“The most powerful man on the right is Rush Limbaugh,”
Lets not forget Unka Bill O’Riely. The one who was amazed at a restaurant in Harlem that the African-Americans actually knew how to eat with a fork and spoon…