U.S. House holds hearing on equal employment benefits for LGBT federal employees
07.08.2009 5:30pm EDT
(Washington) The U.S. House Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on Federal Workforce, Postal Service and the District of Columbia held the first U.S. House hearing on H.R. 2517, the “Domestic Partnership Benefits and Obligations Act” (DPBO) today.
Coordinated by Committee Chairman Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-MA), the hearing highlighted the important need for equal employment benefits for LGBT federal civilian employees.“This historic hearing is an important step toward guaranteeing equal compensation for lesbian and gay workers serving our government at home and abroad,” said Human Rights Campaign President Joe Solmonese, in written testimony. “Equal pay for equal work is a value fundamental to American opportunity. The federal government should be the standard bearer for fair workplace practices, but has lagged behind the top employers for too long. By passing the DPBO, Congress can bring the federal workforce into the 21st century, ensuring that all of its workers are treated fairly and that the best and brightest are attracted to federal service.”
The hearing included testimony from several witnesses, including Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI); OPM Director John Berry; Former Ambassador Michael Guest; Carol Wright, VP for Corporate Human Resources at American Airlines; Lee Badgett of the Williams Institute; Candy Holmes, a GAO employee testifying on her own behalf; and Gregory Franklin from the California Public Employees’ Retirement System.
“Building and maintaining a strong workforce begins with treating workers fairly. LGBT federal workers in committed relationships are not offered the same employment benefits as their married coworkers. This is wrong,” said Rep. Baldwin. “It is time for the federal government to follow the lead of many private sector employers who value all their workers and provide employee benefits that cover all families.”
The Domestic Partnership Benefits and Obligations Act (DPBO) was introduced in the 111th Congress by Senators Joe Lieberman (ID-CT) and Susan Collins (R-ME) in the Senate and by Representatives Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) and Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) in the House.
The act would provide the same family benefits to lesbian and gay federal civilian employees as are already provided to employees with different-sex spouses. To receive benefits, employees would have to submit an affidavit of eligibility for benefits with the Office of Personnel Management, certifying that the employee and domestic partner meet necessary criteria.
DPBO would bring employment practices in the federal government in line with those of America’s largest and most successful corporations. Fifty-seven percent of Fortune 500 companies provide domestic partner benefits to their employees. In addition, 23 states, the District of Columbia, and over 150 local governments make benefits available to public employees and their same-sex partners. A May 2000 poll conducted by the Associated Press found that a majority of Americans favor the extension of health insurance coverage to same-sex partners. In addition, this legislation has been endorsed by the American Federation of Government Employees, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Harvard University, National Treasury Employees Union and United Church of Christ.
“It is time for the federal government to be doing what many Fortune 500 companies have been doing and that is provide federal benefits to gay federal civilian employees as we do with different-sex spouses. The federal government should be leading by example in this clear case of equal pay for all. I urge my colleagues to support this bill and send an unequivocal message that the federal government treats all its employees equally,” said Rep. Ros-Lehtinen.




At least one Republican will support this bill, that being the co-sponsor Rep. Ros-Lehtinen. There are a small handfull of Republicans who vote with us on these issues from time to time, and being a Democrat myself, I have to confess to a high degree of frustration with Obama and the Dems in Congress as they should have passed at least some of our legislation by now.
Good riddance! Don’t let the screen door hit ya where the good lord split ya! Bye, bye!
(shhhhhh…is he/she/it gone yet?)
============================
Morgan wrote: “I am finished with all of you. You are not worth the time of day. Goodbye for good!”
———————-
yeaaaaaah!!!! High fives all around!!!!
Just a couple of FYIs. Candy Holmes is also an ordained minister within the Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Church who supports the bill and Dr. Frank Page was President of the Southern Baptist Convention 2006 and opposes the bill.
Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R) from Utah was the only member of the subcommitte to speak against the bill saying that it was discriminatory because it did not include unmarried opposite sex couples. In addition, he recognized a group of African American Pastors who are opposed to the bill as well.