November 22nd, 2009
 

365 Gay: News

Top evangelical resigns after backing gay unions


(Washington) An outspoken and polarizing voice in conservative Christian politics resigned effective Thursday from the National Association of Evangelicals after a radio interview in which he voiced support for same-sex civil unions and said he is “shifting” on gay marriage.

The Rev. Richard Cizik’s comments – made on a Dec. 2 “Fresh Air” broadcast on National Public Radio – triggered an uproar that led to his stepping down as NAE vice president of governmental affairs.

A fixture in Washington for nearly three decades, Cizik has played a key role in bringing evangelical Christian concerns to the political table. But in recent years, he earned enemies in the movement for pushing to broaden the evangelical agenda. His strongest focus was on “creation care,” arguing that evangelicals have a biblical responsibility to the environment that includes combatting global warming.

The Rev. Leith Anderson, a Minneapolis-area pastor who serves as NAE president, said Thursday the group is not backing away from its environmental stances. Cizik’s resignation was necessary, he said, because some of his answers in the radio interview did not reflect NAE values and convictions.

“Any organizations that speak to controversial issues are going to have critics,” Anderson said. “What was different this time was our individuals and organizations felt there was a loss of credibility for him clearly espousing our positions and values. When you lose that, it’s very difficult to re-establish.”

Cizik did not immediately respond to requests for comment Thursday. The NAE said in a statement that Cizik had expressed regret, apologized and “affirmed our values.”

The NAE is an umbrella group for tens of thousands of churches and organizations.

Anderson said a “combination of things” Cizik said in the interview led to his downfall, including this comment on gay marriage: “I’m shifting, I have to admit. In other words, I would willingly say I believe in civil unions. I don’t officially support redefining marriage from its traditional definition, I don’t think.”

Coming off the passage last month of amendments barring gay marriage in three states, some evangelicals took that as a slap in the face, said David Neff, editor of Christianity Today magazine and a member of the NAE executive committee.

“He seemed to be abandoning the one thing where evangelical activists felt they had actually made a difference this time around,” Neff said.

Anderson said others were troubled that Cizik discussed nuclear weapons as a foreign-policy issue when he could have focused on religious freedom or human trafficking – issues he has championed.

Still others were disappointed Cizik volunteered that he voted for Barack Obama in the Democratic primaries, Anderson said. Cizik also hinted that he voted for Obama in November.

“I don’t want anybody to think, because I’m the lobbyist in chief for the National Association of Evangelicals, that because I voted one way or the other, I can’t represent their concerns,” Cizik said. “So, I believe I can. I happen to think in the primary it was the best choice. People disagreed.”

Anderson said the problem wasn’t necessarily that Cizik backed Obama, but that he answered the question at all as a representative of a group that remains neutral on candidates.

“He wishes he could do the interview again,” Anderson said. “I wish he could do the interview again. As we discussed it, he realized how difficult this would be and resignation was probably best for him and NAE.”

One of Cizik’s fiercest critics has been Focus on the Family, the Colorado Springs, Colo.-based evangelical group founded by James Dobson. Last year, Dobson and other Christian conservatives unsuccessfully pressured the NAE to silence Cizik about global warming.

“It was time for him to go,” Tom Minnery, a Focus on the Family senior vice president, said Thursday. “He no longer represents the view of evangelicalism. He has not represented those views for some time.”

More tradition-minded evangelical activists believe an environmental focus distracts attention from abortion and gay marriage, or they don’t believe in global warming or that human activity causes it.


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • Roger Said: December 12th, 2008 at 11:21 pm
    • And these evangelicals wonder why their favored candidates lost badly in November? Heaven forbid that they face up to the world today and the really critical issues society faces. No, they continue the Victorian obsession with gays and abortion. A new generation is more concerned with the real threats to the world, such as global warming and bigotry, starvation, and hatred of all minorities. What a sad group of bigots they are, and they want to destroy anyone who disagrees with their foolish and outdated opinions.

  • AussieOutOfTheCloset Said: December 12th, 2008 at 5:48 pm
    • finally! someone in christianity has a conscience! hooray!

  • chaz Said: December 12th, 2008 at 4:33 pm
    • Just goes to show you how loving and understanding the Christian Right remains. When will people learn that this group of phonies should be ignored as the bigots there are. They no more represent Christ than a dead dog represents a elephant.

  • TANK Said: December 12th, 2008 at 3:29 pm
    • I call godwin’s law! HA HA HA. All groups under a banner are unified by who and what they exclude. As to this…too little, too late.

  • TJNV Said: December 12th, 2008 at 1:04 pm
    • I agree with Jay C. They are like the Nazis when they do not want us to have any rights and do not care when we are attacked, killed or, fired.
      To me many of these people are more like the leaders of the people that had Jesus killed, than the example of Christ.
      To me any fair minded person would at least want civil unions.
      If the Church wants to protect marriage they need to make their verson more special. Not keep taking away our rights.
      I was once like these people. I voted for Reagan before I came out.
      Tom in Long Beach

  • Phil Said: December 12th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
    • Wow… Gotta love the hard-core right. They’re ready and willing to eat their own when they actually try to think for themselves. We’ll take Cizik with open arms – he’s proven he can actually evolve his thoughts and opinions over time, unlike his former co-workers.

  • Morgan Said: December 12th, 2008 at 10:02 am
    • It’s time for Focus on the Family to go.

  • JayC Said: December 12th, 2008 at 9:41 am
    • The net is that evangelicals are solidified only by their shared hatred of a minority. Didn’t the Nazis have a similar unifying strategy?

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook