November 8th, 2009
 

365 Gay: News

Study: Gay marriage cash cow for Mass.


(Boston, Massachusetts) A study by a noted university think tank has found that same-sex marriage in Massachusetts has resulted in a $111 million windfall for the state’s economy.

The study was one of two by the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law showing the state has significantly gained as a result of the legalization five years ago of gay marriage.

The state’s Supreme Judicial Court ruled in 2003 that banning same-sex marriage was unconstitutional and gay and lesbian couples began marrying the following year.

That made Massachusetts the state with the longest record of same-sex marriage and research over the past five years has provided an insight into what other states could expect as a result of marriage equality.

One study by the Williams Institute looked at money spent by same-sex couples at their weddings.  The other examined the impact of people moving to Massachusetts because of the law.

The survey of married same-sex couples shows that the typical gay or lesbian couple spent $7,400 on their weddings in Massachusetts, with one in ten couples spending more than $20,000. The study’s analysis of state data on hotel occupancy tax payments confirms the boost from out-of-state guests at these weddings.

“Florists, caterers, hotels, bakers, restaurants, and many other businesses have gotten a share of the $111 million spent on the 12,000-plus weddings of same-sex couples,” noted economist M. V. Lee Badgett, a study co-author and director of the Center for Public Policy & Administration at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

“Allowing gay couples to marry won’t end the recession, but their spending still helps in tough times for businesses.”

The second study, found that Massachusetts gained a competitive edge in attracting young, highly educated “creative class” professionals who are in same-sex relationships.

“Data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey show that same-sex couples in the ‘creative class’ were 2.5 times more likely to move to Massachusetts after 2004 than before,” notes Gary J. Gates, Williams Distinguished Scholar at UCLA’s Williams Institute and the author of one study.

“The timing of this movement to Massachusetts suggests that those couples were flocking to the first state to allow them to marry.” Gates argues that this infusion of younger and highly educated same-sex couples could help improve the long-term economic prospects for Massachusetts.

The findings of the two studies confirm the predictions made in previous studies. They also indicate that other states allowing gay couples to marry-including Connecticut, Iowa, Vermont, and Maine-will see similar economic gains the authors said.


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • Roger RamJet Said: May 18th, 2009 at 1:13 pm
    • SO much for GOP Chairman Steele’s weekend comments about Gay Marriage being bad for Business.

      Republicans! Can’t live with them, can’t send them to Iran where they’d be much happier!

  • Morgan Said: May 18th, 2009 at 1:19 pm
    • Let’s not forget that in addition to spending on the above listed items in this article but also the couples’ honeymoon travels and their related spending and the secondary wedding-related spending by all the couples’ friends, guests and relatives and then the likely wedding-related partying until maybe quite late into the evening after the ceremony and reception is over.

      Once you also factor in the personal wedding related spending by those attending the wedding, be it plane tickets, rental cars, accommodations, meals, hair cuts and styling, both clothes to attend the wedding and the post wedding sharp casual clothes, gifts for the couples, etc. then you have a mini-tidal wave of spending in all directions by more than just a couple each time either a same-sex or a straight wedding occur. Wedding for both gay and straight alike bring much-needed cash in tax-revenue to any state that charges retail tax and much needed cash these days to businesses both big and small.

      No reason why MA should be the only state to reap these benefits.

      MA suffered financially before and during anti MA gov Mitt Romney who do all he could to squelch marriage equality.

      Looks like MA is faring better these days under marriage equality.

      I am plan a night or 2 this October all 5 New England states to have or to get (NH likely next)marriage equality to and from Nova Scotia. (Rhode Island will not get even one penny from me as I pass through that tiny and unequal state without stopping) from CT to MA on up the coast toward Maine and then through New Brunswick.

  • Charlotte Said: May 18th, 2009 at 1:50 pm
    • For the behind the scenes scoop on Gay Marriage in Massachusetts Check OUT OUTTAKE
      VOICES cover story….:)

  • Greg Said: May 18th, 2009 at 3:29 pm
    • Duh. That’s all I can say. Why spend money on studies when we could have told them this all along?

  • Nick Said: May 18th, 2009 at 3:46 pm
    • Frankly I cannot see other states doing as well as Mass. MA has always been a progressive, intelligent state since before the Civil War. I cannot see gays wanting to move to loser states like Virginia, South Carolina or West Virginia etc.!

  • jon Said: May 18th, 2009 at 3:58 pm
    • Awesome!
      Besides the moral and ethical arguments for marriage equality, let’s face it…money talks. And loud. No plagues yet, and revenue coming in for the state. Looks like a win that could influence other states.

  • Gimme A Ciggie Said: May 18th, 2009 at 6:26 pm
    • Kinda funny how Americans are more likely to do somthing against their values if they smell money in the air. Im gay, and I would love to be united civily with my future spouse, the more money gays give to these states for marriage the more it will catch on in other states, which is good, but for some odd reason I smell somthing fishy, it always smells that way when money is involved, we’ll see…

  • Tom B Said: May 18th, 2009 at 8:09 pm
    • My partner and I are travelling from Ohio to Provincetown in September to be married on our 20th anniversary. Supporting these findings, we are spending about $7,000 on our wedding.

  • John Said: May 18th, 2009 at 10:02 pm
    • THE NEW ENGLAND REGION OF AMERICA IS THE BEST AT BEING AHEAD [marriage wise]!!!!! Then again even Iowa is ahead – but for how long with a proposed consitutional amendment I bet????

  • Mel Said: May 19th, 2009 at 12:56 am
    • 249-434-2115

  • Karl Rosenqvist Said: May 19th, 2009 at 4:18 am
    • Together with the study a year ago which showed that politicians who are pro gay-rights tends to get re-elected this could be a serious carrot.
      -Vote for gay-rights, get re-elected and help the economy. Vote against and feed the recession.

  • Darik Said: May 19th, 2009 at 11:46 am
    • To TOM B:
      Good for you both. Congrats to you and your partner!

  • james Said: May 21st, 2009 at 2:17 pm
    • This study was done in conjunction with MassEquality – they launched a website called MarriageEqualityWorks.org where you can download and read the full study

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook