SC House nixes mention of gays in date-abuse bill
05.15.2009 1:00pm EDT
(Columbia, SC) South Carolina lawmakers want to prevent violence in teen relationships but won’t allow a new school program aimed at curbing such abuse to mention gay and lesbian partnerships.
State representatives voted overwhelmingly Thursday to bar any mention of homosexual relationships in the new program for middle and high school students. The move was pushed by lawmakers who said they don’t want schools teaching about gay relationships and said they doubt those partnerships have high levels of abuse.“I do not want the Department of Education or school districts teaching our children in grades six through 12 about same-sex relationships,” said Rep. Greg Delleney, a Chester Republican who pushed to make the violence prevention program apply only to heterosexual relationships. “I’m sure it would develop into that.”
The measure, which was swiftly condemned by gay rights advocates passed the GOP-dominated House 75-25 and should head to the Senate next week. It initially was intended to curb youth violence in a state that consistently ranks high in the number of women killed by men.
Steve Ralls, national spokesman for Parents, Families & Friends of Lesbians & Gays, said he had not heard of another state with an anti-dating violence program that excluded same-sex relationships.
“We are astounded that there are those who would prioritize their own homophobia ahead of the safety of the young people of South Carolina,” he said. “Lesbian and gay young people are often doubly vulnerable when they are in environments where they are disrespected and adults are sending clear messages that their well-being isn’t as important.”
Bill sponsor Rep. Joan Brady said excluding gay relationships is fine and declared that, “Traditional domestic violence occurs in a man-woman, boy-girl situation.”
“The fact is, this is a gender-specific, abusive behavior. The overwhelming predominance of dating abuse occurs in a traditional or heterosexual relationship,” said Brady, R-Columbia.
However, a 2004 Journal of Adolescent Health study found that youths involved in same-sex dating are just as likely to experience dating violence as those in relationships with members of the opposite sex.
Brady later said she was comparing total numbers of violent relationships – of which there are more between partners of the opposite sex. She also said her information came from the South Carolina Coalition Against Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault. Group spokeswoman Rebecca Williams-Agee said while sheer numbers show most dating violence cases involve boys abusing girls, all groups need to be considered, especially gay teens who may already be facing issues with their sexual orientation in a conservative state.
“When it comes to advocating for people, you don’t get to choose who to advocate for. No one deserves to be hurt or violated in any way,” Williams-Agee said.
One lawmaker who opposed the measure said his colleagues were making a terrible mistake.
“For those people that are truly trying to stomp out abuse in South Carolina, to suggest that people that are in nontraditional relationships don’t deserve help is asinine,” said Rep. Todd Rutherford, D-Columbia.
Meanwhile, the mother of a gay man who was killed outside a Greenville County bar two years ago said South Carolina lawmakers shouldn’t decide to protect some children and not others. Her son’s assailant pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter.
“It’s kind of scary, especially when we start talking about, ‘Well, let’s see, let’s pick and choose which kids we’re going to protect.’ Are they going to make a difference between black and white, too?” said Elke Kennedy. “We cannot stand by and continue to let them pass laws based on bias.”





I thought there weren’t any gays and lesbians in South Carolina.
It’s amazing how gays and lesbians are allegedly completely evil but none of us is violent. Are they saying heterosexual people are violent and cannot be trusted?
I will say once again, let the south succeed!
This must be why all the calendars in South Carolina have “1942″ on them.
What part of the separation of church and state don’t these brain dead morons in the south understand??? Do you have to be an active member of the Christian Taliban in order to qualify to run for office in the south? Maybe Obama should pull our troops from Afganistan and Irag to concentrate on eliminating the Taliban from this country. Start in South Carolina. OFF WITH THEIR HEADS!
The original bill was actually gender neutral. It didn’t mention gay relationships, but talked about dating violence regardless of gender. It has been amended to specifically refer only to heterosexual relationships. This amendment got added at the last minute and no one saw it coming. Now we are working very hard to either get enough no votes to stop it on the third reading next week or to put a hold on it when it gets to the Senate. Either way, it is probably too late this year for the Senate to consider it so it will roll over to the next session beginning in January.
Once again, in the South, it is acceptable to protect heterosexual children but not acceptable to protect homosexual children. What part of pseudo-christianity permits one group of “kids” to be protected by legislation and another group of “kids” to be thrown by the wayside.
Why is it that some legislators seem to believe that they were “elected” to make laws only for heterosexuals? The gay people of South Carolina need to be taking names and preparing to “kick some asses” during the next several election cycles. The voting records of such homophobes against “equal protection of the laws” need to be brought “front and center” in the election campaigns.
To Casey Cameron, I believe you mean “secede”.
The stupidity of people elected to the legislatures in places like South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, Georgia, Alabama, Arkansas, Utah, Oklahoma, and Texas is breathtaking.
This makes sense. When I was in middle school, the was some discussion of same-sex relationships and the next day every student who attended the discussion was queer as a three dollar bill.
Hold on a sec. My common sense is kicking in. Now I remember. The only real talk of homosexuality from teachers was in my health class where the teacher said that having unprotected anal sex carried the greatest risk of getting HIV. She never really specified that it was sex between men, but we all inferred. And no, my entire graduating class isn’t gay.
“The overwhelming predominance of dating abuse occurs in a traditional or heterosexual relationship,” said Brady.
And just what the hell is traditional? Something that’s been around for a long time? Brady, honey, gay relationships are as traditional as straight relationships, make no mistake. It’s not like we just up and appeared out of nowhere in the last decade. There’ve been gay relationships for as long as there’ve been straight relationships.
South Carolina legislators need to get their heads out of each others’ asses, it sounds like.
Remember their are no gay children in the south. Since they don’t teach homosexuality in school and parents don’t teach their kids about it- then the kids don’t learn to be homosexual. After-all it is a learned behavior- a product of nurture and not nature and of broken families and nontraditional households and satan-inspired marriages.
If you’re ever confused as to what is right and wrong on this topic take a moment to inquire: “What would God say?” Because we so know Gods mind the correct answer will bubble within the depths of our souls.
- This is satire
The armpit of America speaks again… Long live the ignorant South!
I know this is amazing – but gay people do live in SC. We all have our unfortunate reasons. I agree with every post on here. Just remember that some of us do fight the inequality that exists for the next generations of gays that live in the south. Pray for them to learn acceptance and pray for us to have patience.
South Carolina Pride Movement was first to respond to this situation and is working closely with SC Equality, the South Carolina Progressive Network, Sean’s Last Wish, Alliance for Full Acceptance and other state LGBT groups to respond in coordinating outreach to state Senators to stop this bill in its current form. We support the original bill, but are against the amendment that does not provide Equal Protection for all youth.
Ryan Wilson, President, SC Pride Movement