<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Russian gays blame authorities for film fest closure</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/news/russian-gays-blame-authorities-for-film-fest-closure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/russian-gays-blame-authorities-for-film-fest-closure/</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:50:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/russian-gays-blame-authorities-for-film-fest-closure/comment-page-1/#comment-24003</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 20:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3555#comment-24003</guid>
		<description>Let me see if I have this right... the mayor of Mosciow says that gay rites marches are &quot;satanic&quot; and the Moscow court tossed out the lawsuit brought against him because the leaders of the event &quot;failed to prove that the remarks were incendiary or intended to villify gays in general&quot;... ? It&#039;s obvious that the mayor is a toatll ass... but are the people on their own courts really that blatantly and incredibly stupid? Exactly what would someone have to say that would constitute an &quot;incendiary&quot; remark or to &quot;villify&quot; someone? Somehow, referring to them as &quot;satanic&quot; seems about as obvious a threshold as can be had. This court is an embarassment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me see if I have this right&#8230; the mayor of Mosciow says that gay rites marches are &#8220;satanic&#8221; and the Moscow court tossed out the lawsuit brought against him because the leaders of the event &#8220;failed to prove that the remarks were incendiary or intended to villify gays in general&#8221;&#8230; ? It&#8217;s obvious that the mayor is a toatll ass&#8230; but are the people on their own courts really that blatantly and incredibly stupid? Exactly what would someone have to say that would constitute an &#8220;incendiary&#8221; remark or to &#8220;villify&#8221; someone? Somehow, referring to them as &#8220;satanic&#8221; seems about as obvious a threshold as can be had. This court is an embarassment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
