September 9th, 2010
 

365 Gay: News

Retired military officers: Keep DADT


(New York City) More than 1,000 retired military officers, including several who were top commanders, are urging President Barack Obama and Congress to maintain the law that bars gays from serving openly in the armed forces.

Obama is consulting with the Pentagon on the issue and says he supports eventual repeal of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, which prohibits gays in the military from being open about their sexual orientation. A bill that would allow gays to serve openly has been introduced in Congress.

A statement issued by the retired officers Tuesday said passage of that bill “would undermine recruiting and retention, impact leadership at all levels, have adverse effects on the willingness of parents who lend their sons and daughters to military service, and eventually break the All-Volunteer Force.”

Among the signatories were Gen. Carl E. Mundy, Jr., a former commandant of the Marine Corps; Adm. Leighton W. Smith, a former commander of U.S. Naval Forces Europe; Gen. Charles A. Horner, who commanded U.S. aerial forces during the 1990-91 Gulf War; and Adm. Jerome L. Johnson, a former vice chief of Naval Operations.

The retired officers said they strongly supported the principle that “homosexuality is incompatible with military service” and warned that repeal of current law could jeopardize morale and “unit cohesion.”

Mundy said in a telephone interview that he believed a “large segment” of currently serving officers shared the views expressed in the statement.

“We just see a great many downsides to attempting to enforce on the military something I don’t know is widely accepted in American society,” he said.

The statement was criticized by Aubrey Sarvis, executive director of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, an advocacy group seeking equal treatment of gays in the military.

“The signers of this petition are mired in the fears and politics of the past,” Sarvis said. “More than 75 percent of the American public, including most younger service members as well as many active duty flag officers, realize the question is not if ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ is repealed, but when and how.”

On Sunday, Defense Secretary Robert Gates indicated that executive branch action on “don’t ask, don’t tell” was not imminent because he and Obama have “a lot on our plates right now.”

“Let’s push that one down the road a little bit,” Gates said on “Fox News Sunday.”

Sarvis, who criticized Gates’ remarks, said Obama should press for repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell” as part of the upcoming Defense Department budget process.

“The most important factor in lifting a gay ban is a clear signal from senior leadership,” said Dr. Nathaniel Frank, senior research fellow at the Palm Center, a think tank at the University of California, Santa Barbara, that studies issues involving gays and the military.

“Everyone knows it’s just a matter of time before the gay ban falls, so for officers to come out and say ‘Gays are a threat to the military’ could cause the very problems that they ostensibly fear,” Frank said.

The campaign to gather the retired officers’ signatures was organized by the Livonia, Mich.-based Center for Military Readiness. Its president, Elaine Donnelly, has been an outspoken foe of gays serving in the military and testified before Congress on the matter last year.

The “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy was put in place after President Bill Clinton tried to lift the ban on gay service members in 1993. Under the policy, the military does not ask recruits about their sexual orientation, while service members are banned from saying they are gay or bisexual, engaging in homosexual activity or trying to marry a member of the same sex.


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • Richard Said: April 1st, 2009 at 8:50 am
    • It’s nice to see the AP left out the part about all the military personnel who DO support getting rid of the ban. Way to be biased.

  • AnnW Said: April 1st, 2009 at 9:00 am
    • None of the things this group listed will be major problems. What will be, though, will be with the part of the service that has been infiltrated by the religious right. There are a lot of military folks who have bought in to the “God and Country” line. That’s where the problem will be and they are scared.

  • Jessica K Said: April 1st, 2009 at 9:06 am
    • It seems that the only way humanity moves forward is for the old people, with old ideas to die off. We should be listening to the people in the forces now and that number of yeses and no’s on this question is different than the old views.

      Let people server proudly and as they are!

  • David in Houston Said: April 1st, 2009 at 9:22 am
    • “The retired officers said they strongly supported the principle that “homosexuality is incompatible with military service”

      They do realize that gay people already serve in the military? So their argument is already invalid. Gay people have proved that they can serve without their sexuality being an issue.

      Do any of these retired officers know that 8 countries allow gay people to serve openly? I doubt it. This “sky is falling” crap needs to stop. Our military will not collapse if there are openly gay people serving.

  • MichaelnDallas Said: April 1st, 2009 at 9:30 am
    • how do parents feel about their children serving with convicted felons? or recruits not smart enough to finish school? Just in the military for a paycheck.

  • Brian Said: April 1st, 2009 at 9:33 am
    • Apparently Obama is buying into their position, “kick it down the road” means “kiss off gays”.

  • Jessi Said: April 1st, 2009 at 10:14 am
    • and at one time black soldiers were segregated from whites.
      Japanese were put into camps.
      native Americans forced westward.
      suspected witches were burned.
      the world was the center of the universe and flat

  • Disgusted American Said: April 1st, 2009 at 10:24 am
    • While I sympathize with gays/lesbians IN the mititary now,serving honorably under such Primitive policies….I don’t think any more gays/lesbians should join..let the Hets go and Die in Aphganistan/Iraq…fuck’m..til ALL Americans are treated EQUALLY!

  • Observer1000 Said: April 1st, 2009 at 11:11 am
    • These retired military officers sure have their priorities straight. Sort of like Chris Wallace asking Sec Gates about DADT on Foxnews Sunday morning while the president of GM is being let go. Maybe, they should listen to the Governor of Vermont and worry about the economy!

  • chuck Said: April 1st, 2009 at 11:20 am
    • Repeal of an ignorant, discriminatory law will only jeopardize unit cohesion and morale if our troops are stocked full of folks that don’t understand that they are there to serve this nation, and to protect freedom.

      I’d advise that these folks resign as they clearly are not interested in protecting our freedoms, and isn’t that what we pay them for?

      -c

  • Wendy Said: April 1st, 2009 at 12:25 pm
    • Why hasn’t the gay community attacked DADT on the grounds that we are denied access to the GI Bill, etc., benefits which straights get to go to college and better themselves?

  • Wendy Said: April 1st, 2009 at 12:32 pm
    • Other countries have gays serving openly. Americans are homophobic because of people like these generals whose machismo is threatened. They are more fearful of a gay man sleeping in a bunk next to them than an enemy with weapons. What a sad and pathetic mind!

  • Stuff Queer People Need To Know Said: April 1st, 2009 at 12:38 pm
    • A statement issued by the retired officers Tuesday said passage of that bill “would undermine recruiting and retention, impact leadership at all levels, have adverse effects on the willingness of parents who lend their sons and daughters to military service, and eventually break the All-Volunteer Force.”

      Um, really? How?

      http://stuffqueerpeopleneedtoknow.wordpress.com/

  • DeGuyz in Mississippi Said: April 1st, 2009 at 12:47 pm
    • I don’t understand why the heterosexual’s in the military think that we would even have an interest in them. Yikes. Their secret’s are certainly safe with me. They should be the ones not to tell.

  • R & R Said: April 1st, 2009 at 12:47 pm
    • How about on June 30th everyone in every branch of the services that is gay declares as much and provided evidence by thowing a mad kiss on someone else they know is gay – officers and enlisted. And to those that would object suggest that they pull their lower lip over their head and suck as hard as they can. The uproar this would cause would be worth the admission to the circus that would follow. WONDERFUL!

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook