November 21st, 2009
 

365 Gay: News

Report: Mixed court views on gays in military


(Washington) Conflicting Supreme Court rulings on gay rights make it difficult to predict whether any new laws protecting gays who want to serve openly in the military would be upheld, a congressional report concludes.

The legal analysis by the Congressional Research Service comes as Democratic lawmakers push legislation to repeal the 1993 “don’t ask, don’t tell” law that blocks gays’ military service if they disclose their sexual orientation.

“Unsettled legal questions remain as to whether a discharge based solely on a statement that a service member is gay transgresses constitutional limits,” concluded the CRS report, dated Sept. 2. A copy of it was obtained Wednesday by The Associated Press.

The report cites two conflicting Supreme Court cases, and noted that lower courts have struggled to reconcile them.

In 1986, the Supreme Court ruled in Bowers v. Hardwick that consensual homosexual sodomy is a not a fundamental right. Seventeen years later, the court overruled itself in Lawrence v. Texas, declaring in 2003 that a Texas law prohibiting sexual acts between gays and lesbians was unconstitutional.

The Lawrence ruling gave gay-rights supporters the legal grounds to challenge the Pentagon on “don’t ask, don’t tell” by arguing that the policy limits the privacy rights of gay members of the military. However, the CRS report concluded, there’s still a question whether the ruling provided a standard for judicial review that would give challengers the right to press in court.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly turned down requests to hear challenges to “don’t ask, don’t tell,” most recently in June.

President Barack Obama signaled during last year’s election campaign that he supported repealing the law. But to the chagrin of his gay-rights supporters, he has made no move to do so since taking office in January. The White House has said it will not stop the military from dismissing gays and lesbians who acknowledge their sexuality.

Last year, 634 members of the military were discharged for being gay, or .045 percent of the active-duty U.S. force, according to an Aug. 14 CRS report. The largest number of gays who were ousted under the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy came in 2001, when 1,227 were discharged, or .089 of the force.

The House is considering legislation to repeal “don’t ask, don’t tell” and allow people who have been discharged under the policy to rejoin the military. The law is being pushed chiefly by Rep. Patrick Murphy, D-Pa., a former captain in the Army’s 82nd Airborne Division who served in Bosnia and Iraq.


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • Harry Seth George Said: September 17th, 2009 at 3:22 pm
    • @ps2os2 : As a victim of DADT myself, I don’t believe the military is against gays. Yes there are a lot of homophobic rednecks, but they are few and far between. When I was being discharged, everyone around me supported and helped where they could. My entire chain of command talked to me, to see how I was doing, to tell me I was being courageous, and that they were sad to see me go. The military is ready to change, but it can’t until the law is.

  • ps2os2 Said: September 15th, 2009 at 1:37 am
    • Even if the Congress somehow repeals DADT it frankly will not make a bit of difference. The military will still get rid of gay people by some means. They will find a loophole somewhere. The military is known for their stubbornness and *THEY* will find another way.
      I think it is a loosing battle and we should basically wait 25 or so years and try again. Maybe most of the idiots who care in the military will be gone by then. I do not think this is a realistic way of doing this but until the politicians get a back bone and stick it to the military they will not get anything done. I (think) it was a former president that rammed the black people issue down the militaries throat and that worked. It should work again for gay people. All it does is for a politician to stand up and say *DO IT*.

  • Yhitzak Said: September 11th, 2009 at 9:01 am
    • Kari, go read the Constitution of the United States of America. It describes and defines the three branches of government, as well as the separation of powers and consequential checks and balances. The Supreme Court (or Judicial Branch) determines the legality of measures. If they determine that DADT is un-Constitutional or simply unenforceable according to Constitutional law, it will make the repeal by Congress that much easier.

  • Facebook User Said: September 11th, 2009 at 7:46 am
    • This article seems suspicious, and I don’t think 365gay.com should have posted it without doing some checking.

      It would be impossible for the U.S. Supreme Court to reinstate don’t ask don’t tell after it had been repealed by congress. So if the report actually said that a repeal may be successfully challenged, it is wrong. All of the reasoning against gays in Bowers v. Texas was overruled in Lawrence. WTF?

  • teachermahn Said: September 10th, 2009 at 5:59 pm
    • I want to know how the government proves homosexuality. I say we stricken it from our vocabulary. “No, I am not gay or a homosexual commander, I am just sexually active, who I sleep with is NONE of your business”

  • petenick Said: September 10th, 2009 at 11:55 am
    • It is because the 29 countries in the world that allow gay people to serve openly don’t have an Ass like Scalia et
      in the main court. They are a national disgrace!

  • Kari Said: September 10th, 2009 at 11:54 am
    • I’d need to see the full report to actually form an opinion on its merits; but exactly how would a DADT repeal be unconstitutional?

      OK, DADT *might* be Constitutional (emphasis on the ‘might’), but allowing gays to serve would be Constitutional as well.

      What does judicial review have to do with a DADT repeal by Congress?

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook