March 19th, 2010
 

365 Gay: News

Religious leaders call for fast in support of gay marriage ban


(San Francisco, California) Hundreds of pastors have called on their congregations to fast and pray for passage of a ballot measure in November that would put an end to gay marriage in California.

The collective act of piety, starting Wednesday and culminating three days before the election in a revival for as many as 100,000 people at the San Diego Chargers’ stadium, comes as church leaders across California put people, money and powerful words behind Proposition 8.

Some pastors around the state and nation are encouraging their flocks to forgo solid food for up to 40 days in the biblical tradition.

Jim Garlow, the pastor of the evangelical Skyline Church in San Diego County, said he expects up to 100 young adults to spend five-plus weeks on his campus, subsisting on soup, juice and the promise of societal salvation.

“This is not political to us. We see it as very spiritual,” said Garlow, a leader of an interfaith coalition that has held monthly teleconferences, shared sermons and solicited donations for the ballot measure.

Alarmed by a California Supreme Court decision that legalized same-sex marriage, churches of many faiths have banded together in support of a measure that would amend the state constitution to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman. They have become the single largest force behind the measure, recruiting volunteers, raising money, registering voters, manning phone banks and distributing campaign literature.

Under federal law, religious organizations cannot endorse political candidates but are free to campaign on social issues without endangering their tax-exempt status.

Along with evangelical Christian groups such as Focus on the Family and Family Research Council, the leaders of Roman Catholic, Mormon, Southern Baptist, Orthodox Jewish and Seventh-Day Adventist congregations have endorsed the measure and urged the faithful to give.

The Knights of Columbus have given nearly $1.3 million, making the Catholic fraternal organization the largest single contributor to Yes on 8. Donations from individual Mormons account for more than $6.4 million of about $17.3 million raised so far, according to Mormonsfor8.com, a Web site set up by a church member.

Religious leaders have addressed the issue from the pulpit, in Sunday schools and Bible study meetings, and through telephone calls, letters and visits to parishioners.

The California Conference of Catholic Bishops has given the state’s 1,600 parishes Sunday bulletin inserts about Proposition 8, and every diocese is holding workshops in English and Spanish.

“This Supreme Court decision was a huge wake-up call for Catholics. It was shocking,” said Bill May of San Francisco, leader of Catholics for Protect Marriage. “The sense is that this is the last chance to restore the definition of marriage, and if unsuccessful, it is going to have serious ramifications for California and across the country.”

Mormon congregations in California are taking marching orders straight from Salt Lake City. A June 29 letter in which the Mormon president asked members to lend support to the proposed amendment has been read repeatedly at church services, along with a 1995 church proclamation that warns: “The disintegration of the family will bring … the calamities foretold by ancient and modern prophets.”

Thousands of same-sex couples have tied the knot in California in the three months since the nation’s most populous state legalized gay marriage. Massachusetts is the only other state to allow gays to wed.

Liberal congregations also have entered the Proposition 8 debate, though not as vigorously as their conservative brethren.

A coalition of religious leaders called California Faith for Equality has been working to persuade people of faith to oppose the ballot measure on spiritual and social justice grounds. California’s Episcopal bishops also have come out against the measure, which a Field Poll reported last week was opposed by 55 percent of likely voters.

“Everybody understands that Jesus, in his own culture, was notorious and persecuted for consorting with outcasts,” said the Rev. Peter Laarman, a United Church of Christ minister who opposes the gay marriage ban. “When Jesus said all are welcome at the table, I think he really meant all.”


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • Alex Said: September 26th, 2008 at 8:18 am
    • HA-HA-HA! That’s too funny! For those who are planning on fasting, I say why stop there? Continue on with the fast beyond the November election date and continue to “pray the gay away” and maybe it will happen.

      If not, oh well. You’ll starve to death and gay people won’t be an issue anymore. Problem solved…

  • Bud Evans Said: September 26th, 2008 at 7:04 pm
    • In response to what TigerTzu Said: September 25th, 2008 at 1:38 pm who cited a Bud Evans essay.

      Bud Evans wrote: “The horrors that are committed in the name of any alleged “god” makes one wonder if there is anything in any religion that is worth bothering with.”

      TigerTzu objected:
      “Buddhists come to mind, but seeing as how they don’t make waves in causing problems for other people, it’s easy to see how they slipped under your radar.”

      Bud Evans responds: Buddhism is not an authoritarian “god” centered belief system. A great number of people, including many Buddhists, don’t consider it a religion at all. Buddhists don’t believe in “god”. Didn’t you know that? The Buddha is a both a spiritual avatar and a objective based on the life and the teachings of a wealthy prince from northern India who lived in the 5th Century B.C.E. and who became a monk — not a god. There is no “god” in Buddhism. There is only breaking the presumptive cycle of reincarnation and achieving enlightenment; then becoming one with “deathlessness”; absolute truth; Nirvana.

      No god.

      Got it…no god.

      TigerTzi, I understand Buddhists very well, TigerTzu. I once was one. In some ways, I suppose I still am. The Buddha said that each one of us are Buddhas too who will all someday find enlightenment. Some sooner; some later. It depends on whether we take the long path or the short path — the journey may be different, but the destination is the same. And guess what, you don’t even have to be a Buddhist get there. What other “religion” can say that without threats of hell and damnation if you leave the club?

      I often find that difficult to reconcile with the my other “western” beliefs. But I am not religious. I find religion with a big “R” a dangerous companion to logic and even to spirituality. Logic has its place in understanding, but so does love and compassion and the recognition of truth and beauty in all things. How do you logically, empirically, scientifically define and measure love, wonderment and beauty? You can’t.

      My approach to studying both rational human behavior and spirituality is the same. Everything is viewed through the lens of our own experience. So, in essence, we live alone in one reality (subjective reality) while we co-exist in another (objective reality). Sometimes through art, poetry, music and literature we can bridge that gulf. Sometime it only takes an act of kindness to set someone else upon the path to their own spiritual journey.

      http://rainfish2000.blogspot.com/2005/10/i-am-more-than-myself.html

      But my essay dealt mainly with authoritarian “god” centered “religions“. Perhaps it is just a matter of “western” semantics. Spirituality is not necessarily religion. I was referring to authoritarian tribalistic sects such as the Abrahamic religions: i.e., Judaism, Christianity and Islam. If Buddhism became evangelical and compulsory, I would put it in that same category. But it is not; it never has been.

      Sorry you didn’t understand that in the context of the essay. Hopefully, now you do. Thank for your comment.

      Peace.

  • Jamnastic Said: September 27th, 2008 at 6:43 am
    • To all the people who wish that those Christians would starve to death: God bless you and open your eyes. I wish you all the best.
      What bothers me about this is how everyone thinks it’s about equality, but it’s not. Marriage already is for everyone, for every single adult! Equality has been achieved!
      What’s being pushed is not equality for everyone, but additional rights through redefining marriage. Right now, everyone can marry someone of the opposite biological sex, regardless of sexual orientation. That’s equality. What some people want is additional rights (for everyone): the right to marry someone of the same sex.
      If Muslims were to campaign for polygamy, would that be “equality for all”? If paedophiles campaigned for the right to marry minors, would that be “equality for all”? …
      If for some reason, marriage for minority ethnic groups were outlawed, that’s when an “equality for all” outcry would be appropriate.

  • Lee Said: September 27th, 2008 at 8:30 pm
    • I find these pastors to be spiritually bankrupt. How sad a commentary to see these people negating the message the master Jesus

  • Rick Said: September 27th, 2008 at 9:44 pm
    • You are sorely misguided, Jamnastic. I cannot believe you are advocating homosexuals marrying someone of the opposite gender. Surely that would be a lie before God, something I’m sure He would find offensive.

      As to equality, I believe equality will be achieved when people like you butt out of the relationships that are supposed to be between two people, either civilly or in the presence of God. There is an alternative: If you claim you have the right to vote on whether or not we should be permitted to marry and to whom, I wish to assert my equal right to have the opportunity to vote on who you are permitted to marry.

      As to your ridiculous discussion of polygamy and pedophilia, those are both tired analogies. I have news for you. Polygamy and pedophilia are illegal, as in criminal. Our relationships are not.

      The bottom line is that if you don’t like same-sex marriage you are perfectly within your rights to not enter into one.

  • reh303 Said: September 27th, 2008 at 10:58 pm
    • Wow Jamnastic. God have mercy on your wretched soul.

  • rjb Said: September 28th, 2008 at 1:11 am
    • Jamnastic-
      Your argument is analogous to telling a person in a wheelchair: “Our building does have equal access for all. Anyone who can climb those five flights of stairs can get in, able-bodied or not!”

  • Jayson Said: September 29th, 2008 at 11:32 am
    • If you listen to the reasons why people don’t want same-sex marriage, you will hear the same quotes that we heard in the late 60s when there was flack about interacial marriage. I was married in July and none of my friend’s or anyone else’s marriage has suffered because I married my partner of 24 years.

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook