<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

	
		

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Partner bill passes Colorado house</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/news/partner-bill-passes-colorado-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/partner-bill-passes-colorado-house/</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:11:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SOLDIERinIRAQ</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/partner-bill-passes-colorado-house/comment-page-1/#comment-44644</link>
		<dc:creator>SOLDIERinIRAQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=5556#comment-44644</guid>
		<description>Its a shame that benefits for spouses are costing the state so much... Maybe they should do away with heterosexual marriage benefits for awhile.  Afterall, if same sex partners are given benefits and they are far fewer in number... We will definitly save money in that State.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a shame that benefits for spouses are costing the state so much&#8230; Maybe they should do away with heterosexual marriage benefits for awhile.  Afterall, if same sex partners are given benefits and they are far fewer in number&#8230; We will definitly save money in that State.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJNV</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/partner-bill-passes-colorado-house/comment-page-1/#comment-44635</link>
		<dc:creator>TJNV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 07:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=5556#comment-44635</guid>
		<description>Colorado should tax focus on the family! 
Not really,  but these people are so full of the love of Christ only for people just like themselves.  Why should a hard working state employee be denied being able to insure the ones they love.

Tom in Long Beach (luckily insured by my domestic partner / Husband) in CA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colorado should tax focus on the family!<br />
Not really,  but these people are so full of the love of Christ only for people just like themselves.  Why should a hard working state employee be denied being able to insure the ones they love.</p>
<p>Tom in Long Beach (luckily insured by my domestic partner / Husband) in CA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/partner-bill-passes-colorado-house/comment-page-1/#comment-44626</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 05:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=5556#comment-44626</guid>
		<description>wow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/partner-bill-passes-colorado-house/comment-page-1/#comment-44579</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=5556#comment-44579</guid>
		<description>The Focus on the Family ad is targeting a different bill (SB 88 in the state senate) that would grant state health benefits (among other things) to &quot;domestic partners&quot; of state employees.

This bill won&#039;t cost the state anything, and if anything will save couples the cost of lawyers to draft up a set of documents saying the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Focus on the Family ad is targeting a different bill (SB 88 in the state senate) that would grant state health benefits (among other things) to &#8220;domestic partners&#8221; of state employees.</p>
<p>This bill won&#8217;t cost the state anything, and if anything will save couples the cost of lawyers to draft up a set of documents saying the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/partner-bill-passes-colorado-house/comment-page-1/#comment-44564</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=5556#comment-44564</guid>
		<description>Very good!  This is the state where I live, and while we&#039;re not where we need to be yet, we&#039;re moving in the right direction which is a lot more than I can say for many other states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good!  This is the state where I live, and while we&#8217;re not where we need to be yet, we&#8217;re moving in the right direction which is a lot more than I can say for many other states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
		
	
