Comments on: Palin’s earmark requests called hypocritical

By: John

John — Fri, 12 Sep 2008 07:04:07 +0000

Palin’s hypocracy is disgusting. Saying she is against earmarks is a complete lie when she sought them for her whole political career. And her flip flop on the Bridge to Nowhere shows she is just a shrill politician willing to do anything for her personal gain. After reversing her position on the Bridge to Nowhere did she return the federal taxpayer money to the federal treasury. No! She spent it on another pork barrel project. Heaven help us if she becomes America’s next VP. She is just another crooked politician.

By: Edward Agrisea

Edward Agrisea — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:23:43 +0000

I find it interesting that “earmarks” that benefit taxpayers inside the USA is a big deal, yet the USA has spent how much in Iraq and Afghanistan ??? Billions or is it a Trillion now? How do you place a price tag on an American military person killed there?

Of course, the Bush-washed population thinks its really in the USA’s best interest to keep us free by being in Iraq and Afghanistan – If the USA had not stuck their nose, fingers, weapons, etc. in to almost every country on the planet’s business, this really would not be an issue. And for those other Bush-whacked folks, if the citizens of a foreign country want to become ‘free,’ its their fight, not America’s. We’ve already been there, done that, and look at us now.

By: vanndean

vanndean — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 17:02:09 +0000

If they are both willing to LIE about the little things what would ever prevent them from lying about something of great importance. A person that will tell a white lie will also tell a, dare I say, black one.

By: Brad Ryden

Brad Ryden — Thu, 11 Sep 2008 16:30:42 +0000

Those earmark figures for Obama and Palin seem a little, shall we say large. Please can you give me some links where these figures can be documented. To be far, both Obama’s and Palin’s documentation would be appreciated. Brad Ryden