Comments on: Palin defends Miss Calif. from ‘malicious’ attacks

By: montrealbren

montrealbren — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:53:06 +0000

Palin and Prejean in 2012!

The future of the GOP is bright indeed…

By: Bikerbear

Bikerbear — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:30:31 +0000

And furthermore…Miss Prejean and Palin Both their names start with P dont they!

By: Bikerbear

Bikerbear — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 16:29:10 +0000

Ya know Im so sick of her BS and her hidden adjenda to talk about the president behind his back, and furthermore when she wanted to go to lunch with Obama at the whitehouse! RIGHT!

By: James

James — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:55:36 +0000

Sarah Palin needs to take her dirty nose out of this contest and focus on being a governor, she’ll certainly never be the president of the US. She’s a full paced liar with a right wing cover up.

By: Gerry Fisher

Gerry Fisher — Thu, 21 May 2009 13:48:44 +0000

>Wish we did go by old bible laws, so that women like this would be STONED to death, then maybe they would SHUT UP!

Yeah, religious law, SIGN ME UP!

Wait a minute…don’t they chop gay guys’ heads off in or hang them in the middle east for being gay? Hmmmm…nevermind!

By: Myke

Myke — Wed, 20 May 2009 00:10:37 +0000

Robin, I guess being an abomination isn’t being called a name? Mestruator is about the most sexist word on here. I guess if we don’t bleed we are sexists?
Maybe they just happen to be dumb and be women? Just a thought. Maybe I should be the Ejaculator? Nah, that’s sexist.

By: Robin

Robin — Tue, 19 May 2009 23:21:55 +0000

Amazing,, someone defends a person’s right to express her opinion and what happesn,, its back to name calling. That’ll really help us land the right to marry the one we love. I read one comment on how Ms Prejean had her say and now we’re having ours,, well, i don’t remember her calling anyone names so fine, have a different view, just drop name calling. For the record, aside from the gay marriage issue, i like sarah palin and would vote for her as president any day of the week, and before you start jumping down my throat as to how i can support someone wanting to not allow me to marry a man when i find the right guy; just remember,, a lot of you voted for and support obama because you thought he was going to come to our rescue, well guess what??? he hasn’t done thing one for the gay community has he, like DADT???? i rather have someone outright disagree with me, than look me in the eyes and tell me the opposite as to what he really thinks. If we really want to be able to marry the one we love, let’s work on it by changing minds.

By: RICK N NICK

RICK N NICK — Tue, 19 May 2009 17:38:11 +0000

BIMBO TO BIMBO–YOUR SOOOOO PRETTY AND INTELLGEN,,,,SMAR,,,,,,,,,,ER,,PRETTY !!

By: Brad

Brad — Tue, 19 May 2009 15:50:34 +0000

The former vice presidential candidate says in a statement, “The liberal onslaught of malicious attacks against Carrie Prejean for expressing her opinion is despicable.”

Hmmmm, and it’s ok for conseratives to do the same to us. What goes around, comes around. Is their 15 min up yet?

By: Morgan

Morgan — Tue, 19 May 2009 14:35:18 +0000

TJNV, Jerry, etc,
Sorry, but I’ve waited for 55 years to get married to the man I will one day meet and love with all my heart, and in my own state of MD where I reside full time and not in CA (whenever that state marriage equality comes back) and not in New England.

Marriage is for every adult who wants it, it provides the protections, the safety net, respect and security in every area of existence for any married couple gay or straight (and the failed civil unions experiment in NJ has shown to us most of us gays in Maryland that we want marriage over civil unions any day) as civil unions can’t and don’t. Marriage covers things that civil unions can’t. Civil unions (as the people in New Jersey civil unions have found out for themselves) need constant explaining to each and every person, agency or medical professional empowered to make decisions that can impact the lives of a couple, whereas even 10 year olds on up to 100 year olds or older instantly understand the state of being married to another person. As some dictionaries define marriage (I prefer the English-language dictionary that I bought in Canada to the USA version at the time and mailed it home to the US) after marriage equality had been law in Canada long enough to render the word marriage gender neutral as reflected in that Canadian dictionary.

And shocker of all shockers, Tom, etc.
this GWM plans to marry another another GM (note there is nothing selected between the G and the M as I will go whereever my heart leads me) in our favorite c****h (oh, no, not that nasty 6-letter word again!)