<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One-in-four chance McCain wouldn&#8217;t survive 2nd term</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/news/one-in-four-chance-mccain-wouldnt-survive-2nd-term/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/one-in-four-chance-mccain-wouldnt-survive-2nd-term/</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 06:09:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Trace</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/one-in-four-chance-mccain-wouldnt-survive-2nd-term/comment-page-1/#comment-23035</link>
		<dc:creator>Trace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3494#comment-23035</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t know that second terms were automatic?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know that second terms were automatic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jizzle</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/one-in-four-chance-mccain-wouldnt-survive-2nd-term/comment-page-1/#comment-22987</link>
		<dc:creator>Jizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 17:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3494#comment-22987</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a McCain fan, but come on, is this really news?  McCain is older than Obama, his likelihood of dying is higher obviously...and we&#039;re talking about a second term [and he hasn&#039;t even gotten into a first term]...this is a terrible non story, next</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a McCain fan, but come on, is this really news?  McCain is older than Obama, his likelihood of dying is higher obviously&#8230;and we&#8217;re talking about a second term [and he hasn't even gotten into a first term]&#8230;this is a terrible non story, next</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Sullivan</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/one-in-four-chance-mccain-wouldnt-survive-2nd-term/comment-page-1/#comment-22982</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Sullivan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 16:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3494#comment-22982</guid>
		<description>Add to this the stress of a Presidential campaign, regardless of which candidate it is on. He has shown exceedingly poor judgment though - Palin was the 1st major misstep and his &quot;rushing off to save the bailout&quot; being #2. Both have backfired to one degree or another. Seems the bar for Palin is now set so low that she only has to be left standing for her people to declare her victorious. While I&#039;m not of the mindset that McCain&#039;s age should be a disqualifier - it is a factor that should nonetheless be considered, moreso when you consider that Palin would default into the Presidency is he should pass - a terrifying thought at best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Add to this the stress of a Presidential campaign, regardless of which candidate it is on. He has shown exceedingly poor judgment though &#8211; Palin was the 1st major misstep and his &#8220;rushing off to save the bailout&#8221; being #2. Both have backfired to one degree or another. Seems the bar for Palin is now set so low that she only has to be left standing for her people to declare her victorious. While I&#8217;m not of the mindset that McCain&#8217;s age should be a disqualifier &#8211; it is a factor that should nonetheless be considered, moreso when you consider that Palin would default into the Presidency is he should pass &#8211; a terrifying thought at best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pogovio</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/one-in-four-chance-mccain-wouldnt-survive-2nd-term/comment-page-1/#comment-22973</link>
		<dc:creator>pogovio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3494#comment-22973</guid>
		<description>Being a mathematician, I looked up the mortality tables and did these calculations several weeks ago. From those tables for the general U.S. population, it worked out to be a 1-in-3 chance that McCain would die before the end of a second term.

The Atlanta actuarial firm has &quot;individualized&quot; the probability for McCain, - that is, increased his probability of 8-year survival. This undoubtedly was because of the superior medical care his wealth and position would buy. However, it&#039;s not likely they factored in a decrease because of the trauma of his years as a POW, because the statistical data base just doesn&#039;t exist for that. Nevertheless, the decreased longevity due to early life hardship is known, it&#039;s just not known how much would result from this particular trauma.

I think it&#039;s misleading for the firm to quote the 1-in-4 chance of death, without acknowledging that the general actuarial tables yield a 1-in-3 chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a mathematician, I looked up the mortality tables and did these calculations several weeks ago. From those tables for the general U.S. population, it worked out to be a 1-in-3 chance that McCain would die before the end of a second term.</p>
<p>The Atlanta actuarial firm has &#8220;individualized&#8221; the probability for McCain, &#8211; that is, increased his probability of 8-year survival. This undoubtedly was because of the superior medical care his wealth and position would buy. However, it&#8217;s not likely they factored in a decrease because of the trauma of his years as a POW, because the statistical data base just doesn&#8217;t exist for that. Nevertheless, the decreased longevity due to early life hardship is known, it&#8217;s just not known how much would result from this particular trauma.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s misleading for the firm to quote the 1-in-4 chance of death, without acknowledging that the general actuarial tables yield a 1-in-3 chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
