Obama defends choice of anti-gay pastor
12.18.2008 4:10pm EST
(Washington) President-elect Barack Obama on Thursday defended his choice of a popular evangelical minister to deliver the invocation at his inauguration, rejecting criticism that it slights gays.
The selection of Pastor Rick Warren brought objections from gay rights advocates, who strongly supported Obama during the election campaign. The advocates are angry over Warren’s backing of a California ballot initiative banning gay marriage. That measure was approved by voters last month.But Obama told reporters in Chicago that America needs to “come together,” even when there’s disagreement on social issues. “That dialogue is part of what my campaign is all about,” he said.
Obama also said he’s known to be a “fierce advocate for equality” for gays and lesbians, and will remain so.
Obama inaugural committee spokeswoman Linda Douglass told 365gay News:
“Rick Warren has been a leader in the evangelical community for HIV/AIDS, poverty and other issues upon which he and President-elect Obama agree. But they do not agree on LGBT issues. . . .His inaugural program reflects the diversity of opinion.”
Douglass noted that Warren would be joined by Rev. Joseph Lowery, whom she called “an outspoken supporter of gay rights.” Lowery is considered the dean of the black civil rights movement.
Warren, a best-selling author and leader of a Southern California megachurch, is one of a new breed of evangelicals who stress the need for action on social issues such as reducing poverty and protecting the environment, alongside traditional theological themes.
The Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest gay rights organization, said Warren’s opposition to gay marriage is a sign of intolerance.
“We feel a deep level of disrespect when one of the architects and promoters of an anti-gay agenda is given the prominence and the pulpit of your historic nomination,” the group said in a letter to Obama, asking him to reconsider.
Obama’s selection of Warren is seen as a signal to religious conservatives that the president-elect will listen to their views. During the campaign, Warren interviewed Obama and Republican John McCain in a widely watched television program that focused on religious concerns.
Gay rights advocates say they are troubled that Obama would give Warren such a visible role at his swearing-in. “By inviting Rick Warren to your inauguration, you have tarnished the view that gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender Americans have a place at your table,” the letter said.
Obama, however, pointed out that a couple of years ago, he was invited to speak at Warren’s church, despite their disagreements on a number of issues.
The president-elect said a “wide range of viewpoints” will be presented during the inaugural ceremonies.




Give the brother a break! Has he started his presidency yet? I’m just as upset as all you “more of the same” people. Just give him a year, then if he hasn’t done anything positive for us, then sell him down the river, and hate him all you want.
Now that the election is over, this is one of the first signs that we will be forgotten.
President-elect Obama is full of sh*t on this one. Shame!
I am sure that a member of the KKK and a representative of white supremacy groups from Michigan will also be invited to the ceremonies…in the name of diverse idealogy.
>The question is, “when can we expect concrete results in addition to advocacy, however fierce?”
How about by the end of his first term? If he delivers trans-inclusive hate crimes bill, trans-inclusive ENDA, and an end to DADT, then I think he will have delivered. If he adds a repeal of DOMA or more, then he will have gotten an A+. (Clinton’s LGBT record during his 8 years would pale in comparison if Obama delivered the first three things I mentioned.)
yup……sounds and looks like “more of the same” to me.
When Obamanation invites someone who preaches that black people molest children to his inauguration, maybe then I’ll buy his “coming together” crap.
Until then, HE IS A TWO-FACED FILTHY WHORE!!!!!
“Obama also said he’s known to be a “fierce advocate for equality” for gays and lesbians, and will remain so.”
The question is, “when can we expect concrete results in addition to advocacy, however fierce?”
Although the pick of Warren has had me so angry I can’t see straight, I see in this a another great opportunity for the LGBT community. We need to stop looking to other people to give us our rights. We need to protest and boycott those who would deny us, and give our business and support to those who stand with us. It’s true that Obama has spoken frequently about his belief in equality for the LGBT community, but that does not mean that we are done. We need to be a loud, out, and a visible presence.
A “WIDE RANGE OF VIEWPOINTS WILL BE MADE ” AND WILL BE PRESENTED,,HHMMMMM DID ANYBODY FORGET TO INVITE DAVID DUKE TO GIVE HIS VIEWPOINT, TOO?? COME ON , OBAMA , LET THE MAN SPEAK-THEN SEE IF YOU WANT TO COZY UP TO HIM , TOO!!
The United Church of Christ, of which Obama is a member, certainly doesn’t support Warren’s view of homosexuality. I wonder why Obama didn’t ask someone from that denomination to give the invocation?
Will there be representatives from the KKK or some similar organization as part of the inauguration? Maybe a Nazi or two? What about some notable sexists? If we are going to embrace hate and divisiveness, let’s go all out. Don’t just persecute the gays. Lord knows, we don’t want to be singled out as special or anything.
Really? Who will be representing the view that ‘blacks shouldn’t have civil rights’ or that ‘women should not be allowed to vote or to be in the workplace’ or that ‘children (and wives) should be beaten to teach obedience?’
Rick Warren’s views are no less repugnant to LGBT families.
Who will be representing the views of the KKK in the new administration?
Do you mean to tell me that there is NO OTHER PERSON in the Evangelical Community who could represent them without such hateful baggage? That says a lot about the evangelical movement.
This is a pretty awful start for this administration.
How about some champion of civil rights and of civil liberties instead?
Selecting Rick Warren sets the wrong tone for this event.
while Im disappointed at this Warren crap….I have faith in Obama….tho I wonder IF he’d allow a anti-black,or anti-Jew person to speak…since ALL points of views are to be represented? hmmmmm
BULLSH*T!