<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

	
		

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NH Senate takes up gay marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/news/nh-senate-takes-up-gay-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/nh-senate-takes-up-gay-marriage/</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:11:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NativeDude</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/nh-senate-takes-up-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-52422</link>
		<dc:creator>NativeDude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=6674#comment-52422</guid>
		<description>&quot;Marriage Equality&quot; is a much better, and more accurate, term.  I agree with you completely, Rodney.

Now, if we can just get people to understand (especially those who have religious issues with marriage equality) that the religious sacrament is &quot;Holy Matrimony&quot; and &quot;Marriage&quot; is a legal term, we might make more headway faster.

One can legally become &quot;married&quot; without the religious sacrament.  Non-religious people do it all the time.  It is a civil, legal contract that is governed by the State.

&quot;Holy Matrimony&quot;, however, is the Ecclesiastical aspect, during which the union of the two parties is given the blessing of God and the Church, and is usually a part of a religious marriage ceremony, but is NOT required to make the marriage legal.  

Our culture tends to meld terms together or use words interchangeably to mean the same thing when they don&#039;t.  This is most likely because we tend to be lazy speakers, in general.  This is a prime example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Marriage Equality&#8221; is a much better, and more accurate, term.  I agree with you completely, Rodney.</p>
<p>Now, if we can just get people to understand (especially those who have religious issues with marriage equality) that the religious sacrament is &#8220;Holy Matrimony&#8221; and &#8220;Marriage&#8221; is a legal term, we might make more headway faster.</p>
<p>One can legally become &#8220;married&#8221; without the religious sacrament.  Non-religious people do it all the time.  It is a civil, legal contract that is governed by the State.</p>
<p>&#8220;Holy Matrimony&#8221;, however, is the Ecclesiastical aspect, during which the union of the two parties is given the blessing of God and the Church, and is usually a part of a religious marriage ceremony, but is NOT required to make the marriage legal.  </p>
<p>Our culture tends to meld terms together or use words interchangeably to mean the same thing when they don&#8217;t.  This is most likely because we tend to be lazy speakers, in general.  This is a prime example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/nh-senate-takes-up-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-52411</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=6674#comment-52411</guid>
		<description>Rodney, I like the term Marriage Equality. Your argument makes sense. In the past some conservatives used semantics, turning of a phrase, slogans, and euphemisms way better than we did. A lesson in talking points and how to phrase is much appreciated. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rodney, I like the term Marriage Equality. Your argument makes sense. In the past some conservatives used semantics, turning of a phrase, slogans, and euphemisms way better than we did. A lesson in talking points and how to phrase is much appreciated. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/nh-senate-takes-up-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-52399</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=6674#comment-52399</guid>
		<description>FOR LOVE OF ALMIGHT GOD, STOP SAYING “Gay Marriage” use the term Marriage Equality. 

Every single goddamn*d time someone says gay marriage as opposed to MARRIAGE EQUALITY, we lose support. If you support marriage equality then call it marriage equality. If you want our side to continue to lose for another 100 years, then by all means keep refering to marriage equality as gay marriage. 

When a candidate is asked “Do you support gay marriage?” it is easy for him/her to say NO, but I support “equal” rights. When you ask a candidate “do you support marriage equality” it makes it harder for them to weasel out and the mere use of the term “marriage equality” dispels myths in the minds of those who are convincible. 

One POWERFUL myth that the anti-marriage equality forces have, is that “gay marriage” is opposed to traditional marriage. When we say “We want gay marriage” in their minds, it’s as if we’re saying down with traditional marriage. So, our solution is clear as a bell, if you are inteligent, and that is use the term marriage equality NOT gay marriage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOR LOVE OF ALMIGHT GOD, STOP SAYING “Gay Marriage” use the term Marriage Equality. </p>
<p>Every single goddamn*d time someone says gay marriage as opposed to MARRIAGE EQUALITY, we lose support. If you support marriage equality then call it marriage equality. If you want our side to continue to lose for another 100 years, then by all means keep refering to marriage equality as gay marriage. </p>
<p>When a candidate is asked “Do you support gay marriage?” it is easy for him/her to say NO, but I support “equal” rights. When you ask a candidate “do you support marriage equality” it makes it harder for them to weasel out and the mere use of the term “marriage equality” dispels myths in the minds of those who are convincible. </p>
<p>One POWERFUL myth that the anti-marriage equality forces have, is that “gay marriage” is opposed to traditional marriage. When we say “We want gay marriage” in their minds, it’s as if we’re saying down with traditional marriage. So, our solution is clear as a bell, if you are inteligent, and that is use the term marriage equality NOT gay marriage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barry</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/nh-senate-takes-up-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-52390</link>
		<dc:creator>barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=6674#comment-52390</guid>
		<description>already invited to several engaygements....that&#039;s the new word! best parties in the world!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>already invited to several engaygements&#8230;.that&#8217;s the new word! best parties in the world!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samantha</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/nh-senate-takes-up-gay-marriage/comment-page-1/#comment-52387</link>
		<dc:creator>Samantha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=6674#comment-52387</guid>
		<description>*fingers crossed*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*fingers crossed*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
		
	
