November 21st, 2009
 

365 Gay: News

New Vatican plan lets Anglicans convert easier


(Vatican City) The Vatican announced a stunning decision Tuesday to make it easier for Anglicans to convert, reaching out to those who are disaffected by the election of women and gay bishops to join the Catholic Church’s conservative ranks.

Pope Benedict XVI approved a new church provision that will allow Anglicans to join the Catholic Church while maintaining many of their distinctive spiritual and liturgical traditions, including having married priests.

Cardinal William Levada, the Vatican’s chief doctrinal official, announced the new provision at a new conference.

In the past, such exemptions had only been granted in a few cases in certain countries. The new church provision is designed to allow Anglicans around the world to access a new church entity if they want to convert.

The decision immediately raised questions about how the new provision would be received within the 77-million strong Anglican Communion, the global Anglican church, which has been on the verge of a schism over divisions within its membership about women bishops, an openly gay bishop and the blessing of same-sex unions.

The Anglican’s spiritual leader, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, downplayed the significance of the new provision and said it wasn’t a Vatican commentary on Anglican problems.

“It has no negative impact on the relations of the communion as a whole to the Roman Catholic church as a whole,” he said in London.

Conservative Party lawmaker Ann Widdecombe, who left the Church of England because of its policies for the Catholic Church, welcomed the Vatican’s decision.

“I’m delighted if it does become easier, because when we had the last big exodus in 1992 over the ordination of women, the Catholic Church was not ready,” she said in London. “There were enormous discrepancies up and down the country, and the direction from the Vatican came late in the day.”

The new Catholic church entities, called personal ordinariates, will be units of faithful established within local Catholic Churches, headed by former Anglican prelates who will provide spiritual care for Anglicans who wish to be Catholic.

They would most closely resemble Catholic military ordinariates, special units of the church established in most countries to provide spiritual care for the members of the armed forces and their dependents.

“(This will) facilitate a kind of corporate reunion of Anglican groups” into the Catholic Church, Levada said.

Anglicans split with Rome in 1534 when English King Henry VIII was refused a marriage annulment.

The new canonical provision is a response to the many requests from Anglo-Catholics who want to come back, increasingly disillusioned with the progressive bent of the Anglican Communion. Many have already left and consider themselves Catholic but have not found an official home in the 1.1-billion strong Catholic Church.

By welcoming them in with their own special provision, Benedict has confirmed the increasingly conservative bent of his church. The decision follows his recent move to rehabilitate four excommunicated ultra-conservative bishops, including one who denied the full extent of the Holocaust, in a bid to bring their faithful back under the Vatican’s wing.

Levada declined to give figures on the number of requests that have come to the Vatican, or on the anticipated number of Anglicans who might take advantage of the new structure.

One group, known as the Traditional Anglican Communion, has made its bid to join the Catholic Church known. The fellowship, which split from the Archbishop of Canterbury in 1990, says it has spread to 41 countries and has 400,000 members, although only about half are regular churchgoers.

The new canonical provision allows married Anglican priests and even seminarians to become ordained Catholic priests – much the same way that Eastern rite priests who are in communion with Rome are allowed to be married. However, married Anglicans couldn’t become Catholic bishops.

The Vatican announcement immediately raised questions about how the Vatican’s long-standing dialogue with the Archbishop of Canterbury could continue. Noticeably, no one from the Vatican’s ecumenical office on relations with Anglicans attended the news conference; Levada said he had invited representatives to attend but they said they were all away from Rome.

Just last week, the Vatican’s top ecumenical official, Cardinal Walter Kasper, told reporters: “We are not fishing in the Anglican pond,” when asked about the Vatican’s negotiations with would-be converts.

Levada stressed that ecumenical dialogue with the global Anglican church would remain a priority. But he said the goal of that dialogue for 40 years had been to achieve “full visible unity.”

To downplay suggestions of poaching, the Catholic archbishop of Westminster and Williams, the Anglican leader, issued a joint statement saying the decision “brings an end to a period of uncertainty” for Anglicans wishing to join the Catholic Church.

And at a press conference in London, Williams tried to put the best face on the decision.

“It has no negative impact on the relations of the communion as a whole to the Roman Catholic church as a whole,” he said.

But Williams’ representative in Rome, the Very Rev. David Richardson, called the Vatican’s decision “surprising,” given that the Catholic Church in the past had welcomed individual Anglicans in without creating what he called “parallel structures” for entire groups of converts.

“The two questions I would want to ask are ‘why this and why now,’” he told The Associated Press. “Why the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith has decided to embrace that particular method remains unclear to me.”

Also unclear, he said, was the Vatican’s target audience: those Anglicans who have already left the Anglican Communion, or current members. Levada said it covered both.

“If it’s for former Anglicans, then it’s not about our present difficulties, then it’s people who have already left,” Richardson said. If it’s current Anglicans, “There is in my mind an uncertainty for whom it is intended.”

The Anglican Communion has been roiled for years over disagreement on the role of women. But the long-standing divisions over how Anglicans should interpret the Bible erupted in 2003 when the Episcopal Church consecrated the first openly gay bishop, V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire.

Williams has struggled ever since to keep the church from splitting, frustrated by moves by churches in the United States, Canada and elsewhere to bless gay relationships.

At least four conservative U.S. dioceses and dozens of individual Episcopal parishes have voted to leave the national denomination since 2003, with many affiliating themselves instead with like-minded Anglican leaders in African and elsewhere.

The Vatican announcement was kept under wraps until the last moment: The Vatican only announced Levada’s briefing Monday night, and Levada only flew back to Rome at midnight after briefing Catholic bishops and Williams about the decision.


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • footwork61 Said: October 21st, 2009 at 10:35 pm
    • On the Vatican as a country: The US and the Vatican have diplomatic relations because of Ronald Reagan. He saw an ally in the conservative-but-anti-communist Polish pope. Reagan appointed the first US Ambassador to the Holy See. The Vatican’s deep intelligence throughout the world was shared on several occasions with the CIA and State Dept. Reagan gets most of the credit for the fall of the USSR, but the pope played a huge part in it. If not, the Bulgarians would not have hired Mehmet Alì Agca on behalf of the KGB to shot him up.

      [As a side note: Agca has asked the Vatican’s permission that, upon his release from prison in 2010, he be baptized on the spot in St. Peter’s Square where he shot the pope.]

      As far as bad prior church experiences … here’s my sad story. I was deeply involved in the catholic church for several decades (cathedral organist, cantor and all that). When I finally had enough of the hating and hypocrisy, I decided to leave. I’m a slow learner. Several people told me that there are plenty of other churches that are welcoming and I should go to one of them. At the time I wasn’t running TO anything. I was running AWAY from the church. I wasn’t interested in going somewhere else.

      Ironically, when I made the decision to leave the church I was seeing a psychotherapist who was also a catholic priest and university professor. When I told him of my decision, he seemed surprised, but then he asked me: do you still consider yourself a christian? My immediate reaction was: of course. But the more I thought about it and considered the idea, the less inclined I was to seek another congregation or even consider myself a christian. Making my decision even more fun was trying to reconcile with my brother with whom I am very close, but who is also a catholic priest.

      Every group has good and not so good within it, but the more I thought about the idea of churches voting on whether I was worthy of God’s love and salvation, the more repugnant I found the idea of being part of any church at all. I know many good people who are church goers, but I think they are being very poorly served by their hierarchies. The more I looked at what self-proclaimed followers of Christ were up to, the less I wanted to be associated with any of them.

      I guess what I’ve concluded is that God made me just fine the way I am; but, there is no church out there that is worthy of me. They can pretend that I am not worthy of them, but I know the truth.

  • Drewski Said: October 21st, 2009 at 1:28 pm
    • John Sharp–the problem is that the Vatican IS a recognized state. I’m an American–when in the hell did it become necessary or even justifiable under our constitution to extend diplomatic recognition to a religion? Maybe this is considered necessary because of the Lateran Treaty, but that was between Italy and the Catholic church. The US wasn’t party to it.

      Wayne–it’s not just “bad prior experiences.” You’ve made your faith clear, and that is yours; at the same time, there are those of us whose experiences and minds leave us not only without much use for religion, but impatient at enabling perpetuation of religion-endorsed inequalities under civil law. When the conservative Episcopals couldn’t force everything to go their way, they’ve had no problem trying to drag the involve the courts as their allies. In the US, the UK and Canada, the conservatives are the minority. They will split from the main Anglican body as it’s known in these three countries, unless Rowan Williams is really so blind that he tries to keep the fractious family together. That’ll become one helluva legal mess in the UK–which Anglicans will be deemed the ones who are the established church?

      The Catholics aren’t trolling for new members among the Anglicans? Bullshit. As much as the Vatican is stuck in the past, I fully expect that there are those who view this as a deserved comeuppance for both Henry VIII and those apostate leaders of the Reformation. Benedict is too eager to make exceptions to get some devout homophobes into the flock, and it’s all too likely to generate even more conflict in the US church. The more the Catholic hierarchy focus on adherence to stale doctrine, the more they’re going to start running afoul of US Catholics. As Facebook User said earlier, that door goes both ways. Benedict might want to ask what good it would really do his church to gain perhaps a half-million disaffected Episcopals, if it resulted in the loss of a million or more Catholics tired of unresponsive and irrelevant dogma? Also, Catholic meddling stands a good chance of backfiring much more if it feeds both a defection of disaffected Catholics and a consolidation of liberal mainstream Protestants. If a 10-million member consolidated Protestant church were to emerge, friendly to women and gays, it would suddenly refocus a lot of the political fawning over “religious” voters. That wouldn’t go the way the Catholics or the Baptists want.

  • robertocucina Said: October 21st, 2009 at 10:28 am
    • Goes to prove how desperate the roman cult is. Hardly any vocations occuring so now they’re trying to lure anglicans over to augment the importation of priests from the third world. I doubt if many anglican clergy will convert.

  • sharpjwe Said: October 21st, 2009 at 12:22 am
    • the vatican is a fake state witout a single legal right
      they do not reproduce
      they only live on lies
      abolish the vatican now
      john sharp

  • Decatur_Gator Said: October 20th, 2009 at 11:17 pm
    • The Episcopal Church has been getting converts from the ranks of the RCC and the fundamentalist churches for years and years. This is no big deal.

  • Wayne M. Said: October 20th, 2009 at 5:55 pm
    • I see two issues here. Issue number one is the fact that the Roman Catholic Church, out of its refusal to recognize God’s call to women and LGBT people is choosing to ignore many of its other values and beliefs in order to gain converts. The second issue comes up in the comments of some LGBT people. This is the fact that there are some in our own community who are letting their past negative experiences with homophobic bigotry become and excuse for anti-religious bigotry. While it is true there are churches that are homophobic and sexist, others have already recognized the equality of women and are reaching out to the LGBT community. If you do not believe in God or religion, that is your right, but that does not make religion or belief in God into a cult.

  • DaveW Said: October 20th, 2009 at 5:20 pm
    • All the cults with the silly little humans running around “my god will give salvation” and “you’ll burn for following THAT church” would make me laugh if the result of their twisted effort to conceal bigotry wasn’t death, violence and child raping.

      Too bad we can’t be honest with ourselves and wake up to read headlines that are true: “largest hate mongering cult reaches out to bigots of more liberal cult in a bid to swell their ranks and spread more hate”.

      I feel so sorry for these people that have been brainwashed into doing the dirty work of the cult leaders. Benedict is a disgusting little man. Williams is trying but he leads a group fighting between outright bigotry and subtle brainwashing of cult members.

      I was especially surprised to see a woman bemoaning the advance of equality in the ordination of women. Wow how self hating can one be?

      Its lose-lose. Humans, please evolve beyond belief!

  • Matthew Simonds Said: October 20th, 2009 at 5:06 pm
    • if they want to go the catholic church with a pope (can you say heretical church) Then fine, personally I’m happy to see my church (at least the US branch) working to fully embrace the message of god.

  • Chris Sullivan Said: October 20th, 2009 at 4:39 pm
    • Blah, blah, blah – the last pitiful gestures of dying cult.

  • Facebook User Said: October 20th, 2009 at 4:05 pm
    • Should be an easy switchover really. From the Anglican church being ruled by a Queen to the RC Church ruled by another queen.

  • Facebook User Said: October 20th, 2009 at 3:28 pm
    • As the Catholic Church swells with conservatives, I’m sure liberals there will discover that the door of the Episcopal Church swings the other way too.

  • michaelnDallas Said: October 20th, 2009 at 2:42 pm
    • This would only conservative Angelican view that homosexuality needs to be repressed. And the RCC does it so well. They lose their church property to the victims of their gay clergy! Rather than to people who are open to the teachings of Christ and the love of God.

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook