<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

	
		

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Movement under way in California to ban divorce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/news/movement-under-way-in-california-to-ban-divorce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/movement-under-way-in-california-to-ban-divorce/</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:11:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Tauber</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/movement-under-way-in-california-to-ban-divorce/comment-page-2/#comment-78643</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Tauber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 04:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=10983#comment-78643</guid>
		<description>@SteveMD2: 
Sorry for the repost, but my european quotes got mangled in the previous post.


You got it a little backwards: The RC church belives that the institution is the “bride of Christ,” not that Christ is the bride of the church. When priests are ordained, they are said to be wedding themselves to the church (the bride) &quot;in persona Christi&quot; ie. in the person of Christ.

So, as part of the institution, a priest is a wife. As an individual priest, he is a surrogate husband. And, as a christian, he is a son of God, who as Christ, is also his brother.

Now does it make sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SteveMD2:<br />
Sorry for the repost, but my european quotes got mangled in the previous post.</p>
<p>You got it a little backwards: The RC church belives that the institution is the “bride of Christ,” not that Christ is the bride of the church. When priests are ordained, they are said to be wedding themselves to the church (the bride) &#8220;in persona Christi&#8221; ie. in the person of Christ.</p>
<p>So, as part of the institution, a priest is a wife. As an individual priest, he is a surrogate husband. And, as a christian, he is a son of God, who as Christ, is also his brother.</p>
<p>Now does it make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gene Tauber</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/movement-under-way-in-california-to-ban-divorce/comment-page-2/#comment-78642</link>
		<dc:creator>Gene Tauber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 04:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=10983#comment-78642</guid>
		<description>@SteveMD2: You got it a little backwards: The RC church belives that the institution is the &quot;bride of Christ,&quot; not that Christ is the bride of the church. When priests are ordained, they are said to be wedding themselves to the church (the bride) &lt;&gt; ie. in the person of Christ.

So, as part of the institution, a priest is a wife. As an individual priest, he is a surrogate husband. And, as a christian, he is a son of God, who as Christ, is also his brother.

Now does it make sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@SteveMD2: You got it a little backwards: The RC church belives that the institution is the &#8220;bride of Christ,&#8221; not that Christ is the bride of the church. When priests are ordained, they are said to be wedding themselves to the church (the bride) &lt;&gt; ie. in the person of Christ.</p>
<p>So, as part of the institution, a priest is a wife. As an individual priest, he is a surrogate husband. And, as a christian, he is a son of God, who as Christ, is also his brother.</p>
<p>Now does it make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveMD2</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/movement-under-way-in-california-to-ban-divorce/comment-page-2/#comment-78638</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveMD2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 03:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=10983#comment-78638</guid>
		<description>In the queerest marriage of all, priests are married to the RC church.

And Jesus is said to be the bride of the Church.  Guess this means he is a bottom, or possibly a transsexual.

what people believe in still reeks of the earth is flat, the sun revolves around the earth, and the Nazi Pope is infallible.

Yes, he is a nazi.  He just welcomed back into the church an excommunicated bishop Williamson, who is a holocaust denier.

If any of you gay people still are stuck to the church,  I&#039;ll loan you my gonads, so you get the hell out of it.

And let the freaks running it wonder more and more where the money is coming from.  For thats all it is about anyway.

Other then raping people spiritually as well as physically in the name of their God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the queerest marriage of all, priests are married to the RC church.</p>
<p>And Jesus is said to be the bride of the Church.  Guess this means he is a bottom, or possibly a transsexual.</p>
<p>what people believe in still reeks of the earth is flat, the sun revolves around the earth, and the Nazi Pope is infallible.</p>
<p>Yes, he is a nazi.  He just welcomed back into the church an excommunicated bishop Williamson, who is a holocaust denier.</p>
<p>If any of you gay people still are stuck to the church,  I&#8217;ll loan you my gonads, so you get the hell out of it.</p>
<p>And let the freaks running it wonder more and more where the money is coming from.  For thats all it is about anyway.</p>
<p>Other then raping people spiritually as well as physically in the name of their God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Edward Strand</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/movement-under-way-in-california-to-ban-divorce/comment-page-2/#comment-78382</link>
		<dc:creator>David Edward Strand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 22:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=10983#comment-78382</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t support this type of action.  Be careful what you put on the ballot because it may pass and it won&#039;t be funny.  It will injure and hurt people.  Sex was included among other characteristics in the 1964 civil rights bill because of an ammendment by opponents of the bill who thought no one would ever vote for something so &quot;outlandish&quot;.  Well, they were wrong.  This would be working in the other direction but it would NOT be funny or helpful.  It&#039;s one thing when opponents of human rights stumble via a humor and wind up expanding human rights.  IT would be quite another if supporters of human rights stumble over love of their own humor and decrease human rights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t support this type of action.  Be careful what you put on the ballot because it may pass and it won&#8217;t be funny.  It will injure and hurt people.  Sex was included among other characteristics in the 1964 civil rights bill because of an ammendment by opponents of the bill who thought no one would ever vote for something so &#8220;outlandish&#8221;.  Well, they were wrong.  This would be working in the other direction but it would NOT be funny or helpful.  It&#8217;s one thing when opponents of human rights stumble via a humor and wind up expanding human rights.  IT would be quite another if supporters of human rights stumble over love of their own humor and decrease human rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TKnTexas</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/movement-under-way-in-california-to-ban-divorce/comment-page-2/#comment-78279</link>
		<dc:creator>TKnTexas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 03:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=10983#comment-78279</guid>
		<description>I firmly believe that same-sex marriage is not the detriment to opposite sex marriage.  No fault divorces are the problem.  The no-fault divorce legislation should be repealed in all states.  

Bring back trial separations.  Especially when children are involved.  Family counseling should be mandatory as part of the separation.  Less might enter a marriage if they realized how hard it was going to be get out of it.   

Also, common-law marriages, such as Texas has, should be eliminated.  Just setting up house makes you married???  If a couple want the benefits of married then GET MARRIED.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I firmly believe that same-sex marriage is not the detriment to opposite sex marriage.  No fault divorces are the problem.  The no-fault divorce legislation should be repealed in all states.  </p>
<p>Bring back trial separations.  Especially when children are involved.  Family counseling should be mandatory as part of the separation.  Less might enter a marriage if they realized how hard it was going to be get out of it.   </p>
<p>Also, common-law marriages, such as Texas has, should be eliminated.  Just setting up house makes you married???  If a couple want the benefits of married then GET MARRIED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaelandfred</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/movement-under-way-in-california-to-ban-divorce/comment-page-2/#comment-78275</link>
		<dc:creator>michaelandfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=10983#comment-78275</guid>
		<description>If he wants signatures, he should head to an Francisco, Hollywood, San Diego, Palm Springs, etc. It shouldn&#039;t be that hard to find 700,000 gays and lesbians willing to sign his petition.  

Whether it passes or not, let all those heterosexuals experience what it feels like to have your life and love and civil rights printed out in black and white for total strangers to vote on while you stand by helpless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he wants signatures, he should head to an Francisco, Hollywood, San Diego, Palm Springs, etc. It shouldn&#8217;t be that hard to find 700,000 gays and lesbians willing to sign his petition.  </p>
<p>Whether it passes or not, let all those heterosexuals experience what it feels like to have your life and love and civil rights printed out in black and white for total strangers to vote on while you stand by helpless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook User</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/movement-under-way-in-california-to-ban-divorce/comment-page-1/#comment-78270</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=10983#comment-78270</guid>
		<description>This is classic.  Love it.  I&#039;d definitely sign this petition and campaign for it using all of the materials that the religious/political groups used to &quot;protect marriage&quot;.  No better protection than this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is classic.  Love it.  I&#8217;d definitely sign this petition and campaign for it using all of the materials that the religious/political groups used to &#8220;protect marriage&#8221;.  No better protection than this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Witherspoon</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/movement-under-way-in-california-to-ban-divorce/comment-page-1/#comment-78260</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Witherspoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=10983#comment-78260</guid>
		<description>Why not go further, outlaw all sexual acts that will not lead to pregnancy, outlaw birth control and pre-marital sex and no sex during a pregnancy? Wouldn&#039;t that protect marriage and encourage more births, 10% of whom will be LGBT!  LOL
The Author Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not go further, outlaw all sexual acts that will not lead to pregnancy, outlaw birth control and pre-marital sex and no sex during a pregnancy? Wouldn&#8217;t that protect marriage and encourage more births, 10% of whom will be LGBT!  LOL<br />
The Author Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julien</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/movement-under-way-in-california-to-ban-divorce/comment-page-1/#comment-78259</link>
		<dc:creator>Julien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 22:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=10983#comment-78259</guid>
		<description>Haha!Genius!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha!Genius!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ric Alba</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/movement-under-way-in-california-to-ban-divorce/comment-page-1/#comment-78254</link>
		<dc:creator>Ric Alba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=10983#comment-78254</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad everyone&#039;s being honest, that this is to get people to put their minds where their mouths are regarding what &quot;protecting marriage&quot; means.  But more importantly, to get people from both sides of the gay marriage issue to agree that marriage is in a far worse state already, than anything they can imagine gay couples could do to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad everyone&#8217;s being honest, that this is to get people to put their minds where their mouths are regarding what &#8220;protecting marriage&#8221; means.  But more importantly, to get people from both sides of the gay marriage issue to agree that marriage is in a far worse state already, than anything they can imagine gay couples could do to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
		
	
