Miss Calif. is new hero of religious right
04.27.2009 11:09am EDT
(San Francisco, California) Miss California, Carrie Prejean, who became the bombshell of the Miss USA pageant by saying gay couples should not be allowed to marry, said Sunday that her state sponsors urged her to apologize afterward but she rejected the advice.
Prejean, 21, said officials from the Miss California USA pageant were worried that her comments would cost their contest financial backing and tried to prepare her for a string of post-pageant media interviews by discouraging her from discussing her religious beliefs.“`You need to apologize to the gay community. You need to not talk about your faith. This has everything to do with you representing California and saving the brand,’” Prejean recalled being told. “I was representing California. I was representing the majority of people in California.”
She offered her version of the tense hours following the April 19 Miss USA pageant while appearing at the San Diego megachurch that has helped shape her views. The Rock Church, founded by former San Diego Chargers defensive back Miles McPherson, was active in the campaign to pass a constitutional ban on gay marriages in California last year.
Prejean, who was named first runner-up to Miss North Carolina and will remain Miss California until November, has spent the last week defending her comments, made during the pageant’s final round. They came in response to celebrity blogger Perez Hilton’s question about legalizing same-sex marriage.
“I think it’s great that Americans are able to choose one or the other. We live in a land where you can choose same-sex marriage or opposite marriage,” she said. “And you know what? I think in my country, in my family, I think that I believe that a marriage should be between a man and a woman. No offense to anybody out there, but that’s how I was raised.”
Hilton, who is gay, stoked the 30-second exchange the next day when he cursed the beauty queen on his blog and suggested her response may have cost Prejean the Miss USA crown.
Officials from K2 Productions, which produces the Miss California USA pageant, did not immediately return a phone call Sunday from The Associated Press seeking to verify Prejean’s account.
The San Diego Christian College junior, model and member of the San Diego Padres “Pad Squad” received a heroine’s welcome from fellow members of the Rock, where she was the guest of honor at morning services. Seated onstage across from McPherson, she recalled resisting multiple opportunities – from her appearance on NBC’s “Today” show to a performance with Miss USA pageant owner Donald Trump – to edit, explain or expound upon her remarks.
“I knew I had to stay true to my beliefs and not let them intimidate me into taking back what I said because I don’t take back what I said,” she said.
Rashad Robinson, media programs director for the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation, said Prejean’s honesty would have been admirable if, in frankly expressing her opinion, she hadn’t misspoke.
“Contrary to Miss California’s claim, people can’t choose, gay and lesbian couples don’t have a choice except in a handful of states,” Robinson said. “In her extensive public platform since then, she hasn’t clarified that, she hasn’t walked back from what are clearly misstatements.”
Because the contestant’s scores are supposed to be kept secret, it may never be known whether Prejean would have won had she not drawn Hilton’s question. Trump has said one part of the pageant would not have decided the outcome. Other pageant veterans, however, say that based on her standing as first runner-up, low scores from one judge would have been enough to cost Prejean the title.
Besides Hilton, at least two more of the pageant’s dozen judges have said Prejean should have given a more politic, if not politically correct, answer to avoid offending anyone and that it was her lack of tact, not her opposition to same-sex marriage, that ruffled feathers.
“I do not fault her for her beliefs. I fault her for her complete lack of social grace, and that’s a quality I want my Miss USA to possess,” judge Alicia Jacobs, a former Miss Nevada, wrote on her blog.
Others, though, have applauded Prejean for her forthrightness. The other four finalists were asked whether they would speak out against domestic violence, favor using taxpayer money to bail out corporations, give immigrants access to health care and help fund elections in Afghanistan.
“A question like that is not relevant in a platform such as the Miss USA pageant. It’s far too political and it’s divisive as well,” said Kenya Moore, the 1993 Miss USA who was one of the judges that named Prejean Miss California in November. “Half of the audience is going to agree and half is not, no matter what she said. It’s a no-win situation.”
As for Prejean, there is still the possibility she could go on to become Miss USA if winner Kristen Dalton wins the Miss Universe pageant this summer. Meanwhile, she plans to continue making the public appearances that comes with her Miss California USA duties.
On Thursday, she received a standing ovation while presenting an award at the Gospel Music Association’s Dove Awards in Nashville, but said, “up in Hollywood, I’m not sure what their reaction would be to my showing up at a movie premiere.”
She said she would be willing to meet with representatives from California’s largest gay rights group “as long as it’s not political.”
If anything, Prejean has solidified her stance in the last week. McPherson, who preaches against homosexuality, has been acting as her adviser and encouraging her to use her newfound fame to persuade other evangelical Christians to share their views, even if they are unpopular.
“I learned that God has a bigger crown than any man can give you,” she said.





I think she’s actually right, in this case. She’s completely wrong about what marriage shuld be, but she is actually keeping her opinion when it’s not political to do so and many people are pressuring her to abandon it. People aren’t even trying to make her take back the statement because it is wrong; her sponsors want her to because it was politically incorrect and offended some people. My only objection is that she reword what she had said, because she had seemed to imply that people had a choice in marriage, but the fact that she is willing to verbalize her opinions is actually very admirable, and in this matter, so it she.
She’s a foolish woman – and she lost the crown because of it – as she should have. In 25 years when gay marriage is common place, this will all mean nothing, and her life will have suffered from it. Seems to me she’s lost this enormous opportunity over her inability to be inclusive.
I say we start a trend and start bringing them all down, one by one.
There is an tremendous amount of hostility within these posts. Convince her that your position is right with replicated, empirical studies. Even those with a biblical view acknowledge legitimate science.
@ RJLigier Said: “Even those with a biblical view acknowledge legitimate science”
In a country where two-thirds of the population believe in creationism and that mankind is only 10,000 years, I beg to differ. Many of those that oppose gay marriage will take their beleifs to their grave.
Another dupe launched by a religionist cult leader in an attempt to increase his power over people.
As long as there are dupes and power hungry religionists such things will go on, as they have for centuries.
That’s okay, we have a much more intelligent and powerful beautiful blond on our side. … Meghan McCain.
I’m surprised the slur “welshed on” is permitted in the comments.
I say let her milk her 15 minutes for all its worth; I can’t believe people are taking this so seriously.
I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHY MISS CALIFORNIA THINKS SHE OWNS THE NATION…”IN MY COUNTRY”.I GOT NEWS FOR HER I HAVE LIVED HERE 30 YEARS LONGER THAN SHE HAS; AND IT IS MY COUNTRY…LOL!!!!!!!!
#
RJLigier Said: April 27th, 2009 at 5:15 pm
Even those with a biblical view acknowledge legitimate science.
—————————
It would appear that you and Ms. California have a bit in common when it comes to getting your facts straight.
Does this mean the aging beauty queen they were using will be put out to pasture? Are they finally done with her?
I do not believe she lost the crown for venting her true opinion. Miss California should not be penalized or looked down upon for expressing what she believes. Nevertheless, I believe that she did not phrase her statement correctly and her answer was not very intelligent. If she would have maintained a neutral position then definitely the crown would have landed on her head. Miss California should have answered in the following way:
“While I personally believe that a marriage should be only between a man and a woman, everyone is entitled to pick who they want to spend the rest of their lives with and be recognized legally by our democratic government. Perez, I am not opposed to or favor same-sex marriage. All I know is that love is love and everyone should be entitled to experience that wonderful feeling. Thank you.”
If she would have said something around that line… she would have won… She clearly favored the right. The question DOES belong in a stage. Bravo to Perez Hilton for putting a social issue where it belongs. Thumbs down to him because regardless of her answer that is no way to treat a lady for venting HER OPINION. Because of people like Perez Hilton and his big mouth is why Conservatives hate us. We must be tolerant to others as well.
” Religion is the root of all evil “
It is sad that we yell for equal rights and yet want to deny someone the right to speak their opinions when asked a question by a scum sucking lowlife. If i have to choose between the low life and someone who thinks i’m wrong,,i’Ll choose MISS CALIFORNIA, at least she’s honest.
Rob you said: “It is sad that we yell for equal rights and yet want to deny someone the right to speak their opinions when asked a question by a scum sucking lowlife…”
And, while I agree with you 100% about Perez Hilton being a total piece of crap, the reality is that expressing an opinion in a public forum (and on national televisionno less) has consequences for good or ill. You know the old saying about freedom and responsiblity I am sure and unfortunately Miss California (just like the rest of us) has to be responsible for what she says. She answered with her honest (albeit ill-informed) opinion and she has ever right to, but other people have the right to disagree with her and find her opinion offensive.
If she had said that she believed that the races shouldn’t legally be allowed to mix in marriage or that Christians shouldn’t be allowed to marry Jews or Muslims it would be universally accepted that her opinion, free as she is to express it, was bigoted. And while Perez Hilton was classless and wrong to verbally attack her the way he did afterward, he had the right to judge her fitness to represent this country as he saw fit while he was on that panel.