Comments on: Miss Calif. denounces racy pic posting

By: piskodrocho

piskodrocho — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:43:49 +0000

I want to listen good music!

By: hoppiemochie

hoppiemochie — Wed, 20 May 2009 22:48:31 +0000

Hiya all of youz!..
How are yaz doing?

By: Tara

Tara — Mon, 11 May 2009 16:58:07 +0000

First, to the poster who say that it is men who makes women a sex object. Well that is full of BS. Since this woman instead of trying to use her brains to get a scolarship decided to use her body and pretty face to get ahead. She knows that she is pretty and men like to looks for her own profit. This woman is not a victim of men but someone who knows exactly what she is doing.

Second she has the right to free speech including sprouting bigotry remarks. Yes bigots have the right to free speach but so do others who can stand up and say no. We are not going to take it anymore. She has set herself up as a public figure she has no right to privacy and can be attacked for bigotry views. She doesn’t want to have her life dragged up then she should have kept her mouth shut and step out of the lime lite. Instead she is actively trying to promote her bigotry views. This is a battle folks and war is hell. If you can’t take it then get out.

Remeber hatred is not a family value.

By: FRANK COLANTUONO

FRANK COLANTUONO — Wed, 06 May 2009 17:03:57 +0000

WHAT A HYPOCRITE! TYPICAL OF THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT! JUDGE OTHERS AND GET UPSET WHEN OTHERS JUDGE YOU! WHERE WERE HER PARENTS WHEN AN UNDERAGE CHILD POSED FOR SUCH PICTURES! I GUESS COLLECTING THE MONEY TO GIVE TO CHARITY!

By: Robi

Robi — Wed, 06 May 2009 14:14:10 +0000

She did not go on national television to bash and attack gays, she went on to defend herself. The gay whore for hire, (hilton who really was a woman who couldn’t get a guy so she had a sex change to have a better chance at getting a guy) called her a bit*&. Who wouldn’t go public and defend their right to state their opinion, she’s allowed that right. She didn’t start this fight, the gay community did and now cries foul when she fires back. Why doesn’t the gay community fight this issue on the merits that we deserve to be able to marry, not attack who ever their spokesperson is. Apparently, maybe we don’t have the arguement to convince people, we have to attack, attack, attack,and wind up with what we want only by intimidation.

By: Toni

Toni — Wed, 06 May 2009 13:04:40 +0000

The belittlement of Chritsianity occurred by her own hands when she posed for those pics. Complaining that people are showing them is a hypocrisy Jesus would not have approved of. “What is whispered in secret shall be shouted from the housetops” he said.

By: The Menstruator

The Menstruator — Wed, 06 May 2009 12:46:31 +0000

Sure she’s a bigot. Agreed. But why is it that we can’t attack her without playing the slut card? Can anyone blame a woman for the roles she is often forced in to? Men treat women like sex objects and when they start acting like sex objects we cry “slut, whore and b*tch.”
This person is clearly not very intelligent and cannot think off the cuff. We are giving her the attention she wasn’t going to get in the first place. She has a right to her opinion and our dismay but to be sexist to someone, even if they set the woman’s movement back 50 years every time she opens her mouth,” it’s really society’s fault. Her parents fault.
She only gets to play the victim because all women are oppressed.
The only thing she could possibly do now is have a baby (no one hates a mother in this country save for every male deep down), have a lesbian affair with Lohan or retract her statement. And I’m afraid she’s not bright enough to retract her statement.
The right wing needs someone “pretty” and a tad spotty as a spokesperson.
So it’s not ok for her to make money with her body or with her beliefs? Come on. She should secretly be championed for making our topic her fame.

By: Robert, NYC

Robert, NYC — Wed, 06 May 2009 12:19:19 +0000

There she goes again, playing the victim. Its ok to bash and denigrate gay people and our beliefs and we’re not supposed to retaliate. The woman is a hypocrite, using the bible to defend her belief about the man/woman only nonsense regarding marriage and procreation, the primary reason they believe that marriage was instituted.

If straight married couples choose not to have children or can’t, then they too should be banned from marrying. Prejan can’t have it both ways.

Further, is she claims to believe in the bible, all of it, then she shouldn’t be in a beauty contest or in a skimpy, revealing swimsuit. As for the racy pose before she entered….well….the bible has a lot to say about flaunting one’s flesh, to say nothing of vanity, both condemned in her bible. This only proves that she and others like her are hypocrites of the worst kind.

By: Todd

Todd — Wed, 06 May 2009 09:16:40 +0000

Christians don’t become models for this very reason, it is a sin to expose your body like that for others to see and possible lust after, just as it is a sin for a Christian to be in something like a beauty contest..

By: Izin

Izin — Wed, 06 May 2009 08:42:44 +0000

Payback Sucks Doesnt It LoL