November 21st, 2009
 

365 Gay: News

Minn. court rules for Franken in Senate fight


(St. Paul, Minn.) The Minnesota Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered that Democrat Al Franken be certified as the winner of the state’s long-running Senate race, paving the way for a resolution in the seven-month fight over the seat.

The high court rejected a legal challenge from Republican Norm Coleman, whose options for regaining the Senate seat are dwindling.

Justices said Franken is entitled to the election certificate he needs to assume office. With Franken and the usual backing of two independents, Democrats will have a big enough majority to overcome Republican filibusters.

Coleman hasn’t ruled out seeking federal court intervention.

Jim Manley, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, said the earliest Franken would be seated is next week because the Senate is out of session for the July 4 holiday.

Franken, a former Saturday Night Live star making the leap from life as a left-wing author and radio talker to the Senate, planned a news conference later Tuesday and didn’t immediately comment.

Coleman’s campaign didn’t immediately return a call for comment. Nor did Gov. Tim Pawlenty, whose signature is required on the election certificate Franken needs to be seated.

Pawlenty, a Republican, has said he would sign the certificate if ordered to do so by the court. The court’s ruling stopped short of explicitly ordering the governor to sign the document, saying only that Franken was “entitled” to it.

Coleman’s appeal hinged largely on whether thousands of absentee votes had been unfairly rejected by local election officials around the state.

The unanimous court wrote that “because the legislature established absentee voting as an optional method of voting, voters choosing to use that method are required to comply with the statutory provisions.”

They went on to say that “because strict compliance with the statutory requirements for absentee voting is, and always has been required, there is no basis on which voters could have reasonably believed that anything less than strict compliance would suffice.”


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • Sara Said: July 1st, 2009 at 5:30 pm
    • This country is going down the friggin toilet , when a friggin stupid comedian from the not funny S.N.L. show wins !First the President robs us in broad daylight now we’ve got a stupid comedian to laugh his way into congress to screw us somemore !!! God please save our country , we’ve got idiots running it !! Screw Obama …..

  • Jay Said: July 1st, 2009 at 8:32 am
    • Now let’s see: the Democrats have 60 votes in the Senate and a large majority in the House. Yet they are unable to fulfill their promises to pass ENDA, repeal DOMA, and end DADT. No money to the Democrats until they fulfill their promises.

  • drewski Said: June 30th, 2009 at 11:57 pm
    • Joe, explain to me how any third party is going to build a base in the US that will make it anything more than a wedge. We’re not the UK or Germany, where multiple parties have easy access to the population because the density is 500/sq mi or more. Lobbying and campaigning cost money. Moreover, the US electorate has shown very consistently that it’s more scared of the left than the right, though the right has created a corporate-welfare state the full equal of any social-welfare state in northern Europe. So where’s the money, Joe? Explain your theory, because 230 years of American history argue against you.

      Has Coleman really and truly acknowledged defeat? Or has he made noises to that effect, only to drag this out for a year or two if he can find the right forum?

  • Joe Said: June 30th, 2009 at 11:24 pm
    • He might seem like a friend to us, but he will not do anything to change our status. Just like B.O., he will have very specific interests and will turn his back to us. 2 party systems won’t create great social change, so sit back and wait for several decades. Yeahhhhh…..snor. Al…snorrr…zzzzzzzz

  • Bill Said: June 30th, 2009 at 8:20 pm
    • It does not make any difference. We are still treated the same.

  • James Said: June 30th, 2009 at 7:39 pm
  • ALAN Said: June 30th, 2009 at 5:27 pm
    • My burning question is — who is paying for the legal challenges by Coleman. I hope that it isn’t the taxpayer. If it is the Republican Party then that is fine with me. Just as long as it isn’t the taxpayer.

  • Jessi Said: June 30th, 2009 at 4:25 pm
    • JUST IN:
      Republican Norm Coleman conceded to Democrat Al Franken

  • Ted Said: June 30th, 2009 at 4:12 pm
    • Now if Al Gore had only held out for 8 months after the presidential election, the nation might have been spared 8 years of a bellicose oligarchy.

  • Jaroslaw Said: June 30th, 2009 at 4:06 pm
    • Well said, Jessi. I think they should have seated Franken and then ran the dispute through the court system. Whether or not I like Franken, which I do, has nothing to do with this. The other guy is entitled to object (and should if he really feels something is illegal or fraudulent), but if it turns out he loses, he’s robbed Franken of part of his term of office.

      I just can’t figure out why this would take 8 months!

  • Jessi Said: June 30th, 2009 at 3:53 pm
    • and only 8 months after election, makes me proud to have a system like ours

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook