Measure submitted to dump Calif. gay marriage ban
09.24.2009 2:35pm EDT
(San Francisco) A group pushed ahead Thursday with a campaign to repeal California’s same-sex marriage ban, even though some other gay rights organizations think it’s too soon for another expensive ballot fight.
Los Angeles-based Love Honor Cherish proposed ballot language to strike the ban approved by state voters in November as Proposition 8.The new ballot proposal says religious institutions would not be required to perform same-sex unions if it conflicts with their beliefs.
“The refusal to perform a marriage under this provision shall not be the basis for lawsuit or liability, and shall not affect the tax-exempt status of any religious denomination, church or other religious institution,” reads the exemption, an attempt by Love Honor Cherish to defuse one of the arguments Proposition 8 sponsors used to garner support last fall.
Submitting wording to the California attorney general is the first step in qualifying a measure for an election. Once the language is approved, backers would have until mid-April to gather the 695,000 signatures needed to put the initiative on the November 2010 ballot.
“Our group has said since last November that we were going to go forward in November 2010, and we are living up to that promise,” said John Henning, executive director of Love Honor Cherish, a volunteer-run group.
Since Proposition 8 eliminated the right of gay couples to get married in California, gay marriage supporters have been divided over how and when to try to win it back.
The state’s largest gay rights group, Equality California, joined the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and several other established groups in arguing that before going back to the ballot, more work needs to be done to change the minds of voters who favored the ban.
Also working against reversing Proposition 8 in 2010 is the fact that next year is a midterm election in which Californians will elect a new governor. Conservatives typically turn out in large numbers for midterm elections and will certainly be a larger share of the overall electorate than they were during last year’s presidential election.
Still, a dedicated cadre of smaller groups has insisted that the disappointment and anger stirred by Proposition 8’s passage, along with the legalization of gay marriage in Iowa, Vermont and other states, could give them the momentum to pull off a victory next year.
Los Angeles-based Courage Campaign, the most prominent group in the pro-2010 camp, has enlisted President Barack Obama’s former deputy campaign manager, Steve Hildebrand, to chart a course for a possible campaign.
Before endorsing the proposal by Love Honor Cherish or filing its own ballot language, Courage Campaign wants to know if gay marriage supporters have the money, expertise and cooperation to win.
“We have said from the very beginning that to go back to the ballot we need the research to help define the path to victory, we need a governance structure that is clear and that can make efficient decisions, we need a strong, smart campaign manager, and we need the finances,” said Courage Campaign founder Rick Jacobs.
Henning said he wanted to get the process started this week so supporters have as much time as possible for signature-gathering. If another group comes up with a different version that seems to be more popular with activists and the electorate, Love Honor Cherish would withdraw its initiative, he said.
Geoffrey Farrow, a Roman Catholic priest who was suspended from the ministry last year for opposing Proposition 8 in defiance of the church’s official stand, is one of the nine people who signed up to be official proponents of the Love Honor Cherish initiative.
He thinks the language clarifying that churches would not be required to sanction same-sex marriages will boost its chances of success.
“This is about civil marriage, not about religious marriage,” Farrow said. “In our society, even prisoners have a right to marriage.”




Look at the actual language. This is not simply a Prop 8 repeal.
It also limits marriage to two people, and lists who can’t be discriminated against. That list doesn’t include physical disability or elderliness.
It boggles the mind why they didn’t simply strike out the Prop 8 language.
I think we need to go for it in 2010. It may be that more “conservatives” vote in off-year elections than in Presidential elections. But in 2010, the Democratic candidate for Governor will be a strong supporter of same-sex marriage. In 2012, both the Democratic and Republican candidates for President will be against same-sex marriage. Moreover, Obama will attract enormous numbers of religious minorities. They are not going to vote for same-sex marriage. The demographic that can be moved are Republican libertarians. With Republicans like Steven Schmidt, Theodor Olson, and Megan McCain, we can cut into the 90% of Republicans who voted for Proposition 8. If we can get just 25 to 30 per cent of them, that would make the difference.
I don’t know the right answer but good for them for trying. Too bad comments like the envious Mark Daniel Snyder pop up. what is the point about their wealth except you’re jealous?
Love Honor Cherish is headed by 7 very wealthy men, all white but one. They have no experience in collaboration building, and true grassroots organizing. The 40 groups who supposedly support this ballot initiative consist mostly of people who set up simple websites posing as real organizations. Most experts and organizations – both established and grassroots- support a 2012 measure.
Putting language in the ballot proposal, exempting churches, makes no difference because it’s Never been the issue. The people who oppose our rights, do so for one reason only-Bigotry. Surprise!
I say go for it. Worst case is you spend a ton of money and have to do it again in 2012.
If this appears on the ballot the organizations supporting this move must be prepared to confront in the media the belligenent intolerance that is the bulwark of the Christian Taliban. The tools of their trade are fear, intimidation, and distortions. Each lie must be clearly contradicted. You cannot play “nice” with these people. If we do, we will lose again.