<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain, Obama wary of gay marriage debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/news/mccain-obama-wary-of-gay-marriage-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/mccain-obama-wary-of-gay-marriage-debate/</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 04:23:51 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/mccain-obama-wary-of-gay-marriage-debate/comment-page-2/#comment-21869</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3353#comment-21869</guid>
		<description>We are more likely to win the amendments if GLTB issues are not discussed by the candiates.  Look at the past elections, Gay Marraige has been brought up at the very end of the campaign to ralley the far right to get out and vote.  If we as a community push the candidates to discuss gay marraige, we might as well hand the election to the Republicans.

Obama, or any candidate for that matter is never going to publicly endorse gay marraige if they have any hopes of getting into office.  Obama has said he will support civil unions, that&#039;s a good start.  If we can get civil unions, then we can use the court system to debate separte but equal to get full-fledged marraige.  If we try to force ourselves on middle america, they will react against us, so we need to take small steps that will get us there without causeing knee-jerk reactions from the voters.  

Our rights should never be left to the voter, but at this time, that is what we are dealing with.  Until we can get Democrats into power, we don&#039;t have any chance of making progress.

Watch...what you want to bet McCain is going to leave this issue for Palin to disucss.  The holly-rollers will love it coming from her.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are more likely to win the amendments if GLTB issues are not discussed by the candiates.  Look at the past elections, Gay Marraige has been brought up at the very end of the campaign to ralley the far right to get out and vote.  If we as a community push the candidates to discuss gay marraige, we might as well hand the election to the Republicans.</p>
<p>Obama, or any candidate for that matter is never going to publicly endorse gay marraige if they have any hopes of getting into office.  Obama has said he will support civil unions, that&#8217;s a good start.  If we can get civil unions, then we can use the court system to debate separte but equal to get full-fledged marraige.  If we try to force ourselves on middle america, they will react against us, so we need to take small steps that will get us there without causeing knee-jerk reactions from the voters.  </p>
<p>Our rights should never be left to the voter, but at this time, that is what we are dealing with.  Until we can get Democrats into power, we don&#8217;t have any chance of making progress.</p>
<p>Watch&#8230;what you want to bet McCain is going to leave this issue for Palin to disucss.  The holly-rollers will love it coming from her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kari</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/mccain-obama-wary-of-gay-marriage-debate/comment-page-2/#comment-21867</link>
		<dc:creator>Kari</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 12:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3353#comment-21867</guid>
		<description>Is McCain&#039;s having a gay chief of staff a bad thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is McCain&#8217;s having a gay chief of staff a bad thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/mccain-obama-wary-of-gay-marriage-debate/comment-page-2/#comment-21846</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3353#comment-21846</guid>
		<description>So far the marriage ban hasn&#039;t been publicized  a lot here in Calif. I haven&#039;t seen any ads, either for or against, but I&#039;m sure both sides are waiting until mid-October to unleash the commercials. 

I hope that my fellow Californians will vote against the amendment that would ban same-sex marriage. It&#039;s time for equality and doing what is right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far the marriage ban hasn&#8217;t been publicized  a lot here in Calif. I haven&#8217;t seen any ads, either for or against, but I&#8217;m sure both sides are waiting until mid-October to unleash the commercials. </p>
<p>I hope that my fellow Californians will vote against the amendment that would ban same-sex marriage. It&#8217;s time for equality and doing what is right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/mccain-obama-wary-of-gay-marriage-debate/comment-page-2/#comment-21839</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 02:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3353#comment-21839</guid>
		<description>&quot;Obama’s gonna pat you on the back as he takes your hard fought rights away.&quot;

R-I-I-I-G-H-T, Trace. We believe yet more unfounded fear-mongering. W. got us so used to it, we&#039;re just gonna &#039;believe&#039; from now on.

It is McCain who is on record supporting anti-gay legislaton and encouraging States to do likewise.

Get a clue. You. Are. Not. Believed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Obama’s gonna pat you on the back as he takes your hard fought rights away.&#8221;</p>
<p>R-I-I-I-G-H-T, Trace. We believe yet more unfounded fear-mongering. W. got us so used to it, we&#8217;re just gonna &#8216;believe&#8217; from now on.</p>
<p>It is McCain who is on record supporting anti-gay legislaton and encouraging States to do likewise.</p>
<p>Get a clue. You. Are. Not. Believed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trace</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/mccain-obama-wary-of-gay-marriage-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-21814</link>
		<dc:creator>Trace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3353#comment-21814</guid>
		<description>McCain has a gay chief of staff?  What does Obama have? Ohhh, lots of gay money to provide empty promises!

Wake Up Sheeple. Obama&#039;s gonna pat you on the back as he takes your hard fought rights away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain has a gay chief of staff?  What does Obama have? Ohhh, lots of gay money to provide empty promises!</p>
<p>Wake Up Sheeple. Obama&#8217;s gonna pat you on the back as he takes your hard fought rights away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnM</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/mccain-obama-wary-of-gay-marriage-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-21805</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3353#comment-21805</guid>
		<description>Hey Bud E,

Granted I am also pissed that Obama chose to have Prof Cammack campaign for him.  However that is not a reason to throw the baby out with the bathwater. 

Much more important than this - probably one of the most important issues this election cycle for LGBT people - is who the eventual winner will pick for the US Supreme Court.

There are 7 appointees named by Republican Presidents to the Court. Only 3 are reliable votes on issues of LGBT equality: Stevens, Souter and Kennedy. Scalia and Thomas will never vote for us, and Chief Justice Roberts and Alito, based on their conservative records to date, will also likely vote against us.

Both appointees named by Bill Clinton, Ginsberg and Breyer have and will always vote with us. That’s 100% for the Democratic appointees and what, less than 50% for the Rebublican appointeres. 

We all know that the same gender marriage issue will eventually end up before the US Supreme Court.  So I cannot sit out this election, and in essence give one more vote to McCain because Obama has done a few things that we do not completely agree upon. 

I want Supreme Court appointees with judicial temprements similar to the Clinton appointees.  On this alone, I am voting for Obama.  I will not throw the dice and gamble that McCain will not choose appointees like Scalia or Roberts.

And, repealing DOMA, DADT, and enacting ENDA, and hate crimes legistation, may not be everything, but it is light years ahead of where we are now…especially for our LGBT brothers and sisters living in red cities and red states.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bud E,</p>
<p>Granted I am also pissed that Obama chose to have Prof Cammack campaign for him.  However that is not a reason to throw the baby out with the bathwater. </p>
<p>Much more important than this &#8211; probably one of the most important issues this election cycle for LGBT people &#8211; is who the eventual winner will pick for the US Supreme Court.</p>
<p>There are 7 appointees named by Republican Presidents to the Court. Only 3 are reliable votes on issues of LGBT equality: Stevens, Souter and Kennedy. Scalia and Thomas will never vote for us, and Chief Justice Roberts and Alito, based on their conservative records to date, will also likely vote against us.</p>
<p>Both appointees named by Bill Clinton, Ginsberg and Breyer have and will always vote with us. That’s 100% for the Democratic appointees and what, less than 50% for the Rebublican appointeres. </p>
<p>We all know that the same gender marriage issue will eventually end up before the US Supreme Court.  So I cannot sit out this election, and in essence give one more vote to McCain because Obama has done a few things that we do not completely agree upon. </p>
<p>I want Supreme Court appointees with judicial temprements similar to the Clinton appointees.  On this alone, I am voting for Obama.  I will not throw the dice and gamble that McCain will not choose appointees like Scalia or Roberts.</p>
<p>And, repealing DOMA, DADT, and enacting ENDA, and hate crimes legistation, may not be everything, but it is light years ahead of where we are now…especially for our LGBT brothers and sisters living in red cities and red states.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Stoddard</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/mccain-obama-wary-of-gay-marriage-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-21789</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Stoddard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3353#comment-21789</guid>
		<description>Nevermind that McCain isn&#039;t talking about gay marriage with Obama.  

Why isn&#039;t 365Gay.com talking about McCain&#039;s &quot;closeted-until-today&quot; (9-22-08) Chief of Staff,MARK BUSE!!!!!!!!!, Recipent of the &quot;Roy Cohen Hypocrit&quot; Award!!! Yes, Gay Folks, Yet Another Log Cabin Republican Closet Case!  HOLY COW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nevermind that McCain isn&#8217;t talking about gay marriage with Obama.  </p>
<p>Why isn&#8217;t 365Gay.com talking about McCain&#8217;s &#8220;closeted-until-today&#8221; (9-22-08) Chief of Staff,MARK BUSE!!!!!!!!!, Recipent of the &#8220;Roy Cohen Hypocrit&#8221; Award!!! Yes, Gay Folks, Yet Another Log Cabin Republican Closet Case!  HOLY COW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Religious Right Has McCain &#38; Obama on Edge About Gay Marriage : Gay News from Gay Agenda - GayAgenda.com</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/mccain-obama-wary-of-gay-marriage-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-21782</link>
		<dc:creator>Religious Right Has McCain &#38; Obama on Edge About Gay Marriage : Gay News from Gay Agenda - GayAgenda.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3353#comment-21782</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest at 365gay.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest at 365gay.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/mccain-obama-wary-of-gay-marriage-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-21781</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3353#comment-21781</guid>
		<description>I just called Let&#039;s Focus on SOME People&#039;s &#039;Families&#039; to inquire if they still support McCain even though he has an openly gay chief of staff. They, of course, declined to comment (no surprise). You, too, can call them toll free at 1-800-AFAMILY and express your &#039;concerns&#039;. I wonder how Mrs. Palin feels about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just called Let&#8217;s Focus on SOME People&#8217;s &#8216;Families&#8217; to inquire if they still support McCain even though he has an openly gay chief of staff. They, of course, declined to comment (no surprise). You, too, can call them toll free at 1-800-AFAMILY and express your &#8216;concerns&#8217;. I wonder how Mrs. Palin feels about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/mccain-obama-wary-of-gay-marriage-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-21780</link>
		<dc:creator>Chimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3353#comment-21780</guid>
		<description>At least Obama has sat with the LGBT, and had discussions with our people. To Mr. Evans, so does that mean you are voting for &quot;McCain, the same?&quot;. He flip flops on everything, how can I put my trust in someone, who spews out anything to be liked. He&#039;s just like a sprinkler, shooting alot of garbage out to the public. Obviously you are a &quot;log cabin republican&quot; who doesn&#039;t want a black man to be in charge of our country. It&#039;s very sad to have to listen to you guys,&quot;log cabin&#039;s&quot;, go ahead vote for McCain, and you&#039;ll set us back into the closets we&#039;ve fought so hard to get out of. 

Also, to the democrats that are scared of a &quot;partially black candidate&quot;, wake up!!!!...Our you going to let your fright vote republican, because he is an old white man?. I&#039;ve experienced democrats saying that they will never live in a country run by a black president, and to put it gently that is true rascism and very closed minded. I will support my democratic party no matter what, and to me, although there hasn&#039;t been much on gay issues, at least my candidate was open-minded enough to sit with a gay audience and listen to what they&#039;ve had to say. period, I am done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least Obama has sat with the LGBT, and had discussions with our people. To Mr. Evans, so does that mean you are voting for &#8220;McCain, the same?&#8221;. He flip flops on everything, how can I put my trust in someone, who spews out anything to be liked. He&#8217;s just like a sprinkler, shooting alot of garbage out to the public. Obviously you are a &#8220;log cabin republican&#8221; who doesn&#8217;t want a black man to be in charge of our country. It&#8217;s very sad to have to listen to you guys,&#8221;log cabin&#8217;s&#8221;, go ahead vote for McCain, and you&#8217;ll set us back into the closets we&#8217;ve fought so hard to get out of. </p>
<p>Also, to the democrats that are scared of a &#8220;partially black candidate&#8221;, wake up!!!!&#8230;Our you going to let your fright vote republican, because he is an old white man?. I&#8217;ve experienced democrats saying that they will never live in a country run by a black president, and to put it gently that is true rascism and very closed minded. I will support my democratic party no matter what, and to me, although there hasn&#8217;t been much on gay issues, at least my candidate was open-minded enough to sit with a gay audience and listen to what they&#8217;ve had to say. period, I am done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
