March 19th, 2010
 

365 Gay: News

Mass. gay marriage opponents split on out-of-state ban


(Boston, Massachusetts) Thwarted in attempts to force a constitutional referendum on same-sex marriage in Massachusetts, groups that had most vocally opposed to gay weddings are now divided over a bid to bar out-of-state gays and lesbians from marrying.

In July, Gov. Deval Patrick (D) signed the repeal of a 1913 law that said marriage licenses could not be issued to couples whose weddings would not be recognized in their home states.

The conservative group MassResistance has begun circulating petitions asking voters to reinstate the old law. 

Earlier this month, Cardinal Sean P. O’Malley signed the petition, but now O’Malley is voicing his opposition to the use by MassResistance of his name in asking other priests in the state to circulate the petition at mass.

“It is has come to our attention that you may be receiving a letter from the organization MassResistance, signed by Mr. Brian Camenker, concerning Cardinal Seán having signed a petition pertaining to Massachusetts’ ‘1913 Law’, which deals with out of state couples seeking to marry in the Commonwealth,” O’Malley said in a letter to priests throughout Massachusetts.

“The letter also solicits your help in gathering petition signatures at masses this coming weekend. Please know that the Archdiocese was not contacted about this letter prior to its having been mailed.

“Additionally, the letter presumes to speak of Cardinal Sean’s personal disposition and activities he would undertake as a private citizen. Neither the Archdiocese nor the Cardinal were consulted about these matters at any time. Further, the Archdiocese would not ask pastors or any other persons to gather petition signatures at masses. The Archdiocese’s position concerning political matters is that materials shall not be distributed unless authorized by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, or the Massachusetts Catholic Conference, or the Ordinary of the diocese. Regarding the Archdiocese of Boston, none of these has authorized the MassResistance mailing.”

The state Conference of Bishops and MassResistance were two of the three original groups that formed an umbrella organization to attempt to get a ballot measure before voters to amend the Massachusetts constitution to limit marriage to opposite-sex couples.  That effort failed when it was blocked by the legislature.

The third group involved, the Massachusetts Family Institute, already has said it would not participate in the out-of-state marriage repeal bid.

“There is no winning on this issue,” the institute said in August when MassResistance began its effort.

Same-sex couples have been free to marry in Massachusetts since 2004, but only if they were residents of the state. 

Gov. Mitt Romney (R) dusted off the 1913 law and threatened to charge local clerks if they issued marriage licenses to out-of-state same-sex couples.

The old law was originally passed when interracial marriage was legal in Massachusetts but not in most other parts of the country.

After the law was repealed by the legislature, MassResistance began collecting signatures to have a reinstatement question put to voters.  If the group collects enough signatures it still would need approval of the legislature.  The earliest it could appear on the ballot would be 2011.

 


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • Mark Said: October 14th, 2008 at 8:25 pm
    • “There is no winning on this issue.” Did a group from the anti-gay side actually say something rational and true???? I’m in a state of shock and don’t think I can function for the rest of the day.

  • gew Said: October 14th, 2008 at 8:48 pm
    • Is there really NOTHING more important that the good citizens of Massachusetts need to worry about? Nothing else that should be focused on? Absolutely nothing MORE important at all? Really? Nothing?

  • Eddie89 Said: October 14th, 2008 at 9:20 pm
    • So let me see if I understand this correctly. If MassResistance is able to collect enough signatures, then by 2011 they will attempt to put on the ballot a resurrection of an almost 100 year old law that banned marriage of an out of state couple if their home state banned interracial marriage?!

      Yeah, right. Go for it. As time moves forward and several more States approve same-sex marriage, your agenda will look as old as the 1913 law you’re attempting to resurrect.

      Go back to your Archie Bunker reruns and let us all move forward!

      California – Vote “NO” on Prop. 8!
      Arizona – Vote “NO” on Prop. 102! AGAIN!
      Florida – Vote “NO” on Amendment 2!
      Connecticut – Vote “NO” on Question 1!

  • Morgan Said: October 15th, 2008 at 10:24 am
    • Well, indeed, it looks that the gay marriage issue has been settled in Massachusetts.
      And MassResistance will gradually die out due to its own clumsiness and the citizenry’s exhaustion with this issue.

      And the state has to have already long since moved onto the “real” business of its people.

      That said, on to other MA issues be they promoting MA tourism (going to be competing with Connecticut now for business and tourism derived from CT’s brand new legal gay marriages) and much more, wasn’t MA short of revenues under the wonderful Mitt (who has since lost to Deval Patrick the new MA governor and loet his bid for the US Presidency) and a host of other MA issues the state is now freed up to deal with…..

  • Daniel from Missouri Said: October 15th, 2008 at 6:54 pm
    • My husband and I just got married in Massachusetts September 22, 2008 and we were greeted enthusiastically by everyone. I don’t think I’ve ever been someplace where EVERYONE was so warm and friendly. I strongly recommend getting married in Massachusetts.

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook