<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

	
		

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lutherans begin gay clergy discussion in Minn.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/news/lutherans-begin-gay-clergy-discussion-in-minn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/lutherans-begin-gay-clergy-discussion-in-minn/</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:11:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveMD2</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/lutherans-begin-gay-clergy-discussion-in-minn/comment-page-1/#comment-71418</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveMD2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 04:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=9160#comment-71418</guid>
		<description>Just picked this up at midnight Mone EDT

The proposal to allow gay pastors in relationships had two hurdles.  One was a vote on whether a 2/3 super-majority would be required to pass it.

This 2/3 requirement vote failed, with only 43% supporting it.  The news item said essentially don&#039;t hold your breath yet, but this is a sign of progress.

BTW, the ELCA does allow gay pastors, but they have to be celibate.  And there are examples of gay pastors in relationships who say they are celibate, and remain pastors.

I also think this will be up to the individual congregations if it passes.  Just as any minister  pastor would normally be voted on by the church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just picked this up at midnight Mone EDT</p>
<p>The proposal to allow gay pastors in relationships had two hurdles.  One was a vote on whether a 2/3 super-majority would be required to pass it.</p>
<p>This 2/3 requirement vote failed, with only 43% supporting it.  The news item said essentially don&#8217;t hold your breath yet, but this is a sign of progress.</p>
<p>BTW, the ELCA does allow gay pastors, but they have to be celibate.  And there are examples of gay pastors in relationships who say they are celibate, and remain pastors.</p>
<p>I also think this will be up to the individual congregations if it passes.  Just as any minister  pastor would normally be voted on by the church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
		
	
