Comments on: Lawers argue Ohio Constitution bans gay co-parenting

By: drewski

drewski — Sun, 08 Mar 2009 04:54:29 +0000

Standard custody cases can be bad enough. This…here’s this woman who has such a hate for her ex that she’s ready to use the excuse of “those rights don’t exist under the law.” That’s an emotionally unstable game-player, and if that’s indicative of her current state, Siobhan LaPiana has no business being a primary custodial parent, probably not even a custodial parent. She’s more concerned with games and manipulation and “gotcha” gestures–and if she’s doin’ those things, she’s not focused on the well-being of those kids. She’s also not helping those kids, by modeling such unhealthy and immature behavior (there’s gotta be some Axis II stuff lurking in her).

By: Jamie

Jamie — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:31:55 +0000

This would never happen to heterosexual couples. If someone changed their mind then, they would be stuck.

http://stuffqueerpeopleneedtoknow.wordpress.com/

By: LLCLesbian

LLCLesbian — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:56:52 +0000

What a worthless human being! PC or Not PC … she’s a complete waste of space. Wow … who needs Falwell and Warren?

By: Chuck

Chuck — Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:59:57 +0000

I agree with CLT. It is appalling.

By: CLT

CLT — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:44:04 +0000

I am appalled that there are some GLBT people out there that will use anti-gay legislation against each other just out of spite. If we want our relationships recognized during the good times, we also need to have our relationships recognized during the bad times. We cannot have it both ways; either we want equal rights or we do not. These are the same trivial and hurtful ploys that straight people use against each other, are we not better than that?

By: Mr. Coffee

Mr. Coffee — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:30:09 +0000

Please please please fix the typo in the title! Argh!

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:42:24 +0000

We need no more proof that Gay divorce and custody battles will be no different from the Straight ones.

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:15:12 +0000

These cases are examples of idiotic gays and lesbians who are angry with their former partners and are more willing to impact the rights of our entire community than to share something of value (their children) with their ex’es.

Shame on these people!!!

By: mattymatt

mattymatt — Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:20:45 +0000

What a crazy anti-gay argument — that the Constitution forces children to be withheld from a mother. Those poor kids.

(PS: You’ve got a typo in the title there.)

By: censoredagain

censoredagain — Thu, 22 Jan 2009 20:39:57 +0000

The anti-gay marriage amendment has nothing to do with parenting. Look at straight people; they have kids all the time without being married. So since the amendment covers marriage, civil unions etc. put says nothing about parenting.