Judge issues stern warning in nasty lesbian custody case
01.29.2009 5:06pm EST
(Rutland, Vermont) In a long-running legal dispute between two women over parental visitation rights, a Vermont Family Court judge Thursday issued a stern rebuke to a Virginia woman over her latest attempt to deny her former partner visitation rights to their child.
Judge William Cohen denied a new bid by Lisa Miller of Winchester, Virginia to deny visitation rights to Janet Jenkins of Fair Haven, Vermont.And Cohen warned Miller, the 6- year-old child’s birth mother, that she risks losing custody of the girl if she continues to violate court orders.
But Cohen also turned down a request from Jenkins that she be given primary custody. Instead, Cohen ruled that Jenkins must be given five weeks of custody in the summer.
The case was fought for three years in Vermont and Virginia courts. In December, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the case, allowing a Vermont court order giving Jenkins visitation rights to stand.
Miller conceived Isabella through artificial insemination. At the time, Miller was in a relationship with Jenkins, which had been formalized by a civil union in Vermont where they then resided.
When the relationship between the two women soured and they split up, a judge in Vermont gave Jenkins temporary visitation rights with the child.
Miller then fled with her daughter to Virginia, which has some of the most anti-gay legislation in the country. She declared she was no longer a lesbian, hired a conservative Christian law firm – the Liberty Counsel – and went to court in Virginia seeking sole custody of the child.
Miller argued that since gay unions are banned in Virginia she was not obligated to abide by the Vermont ruling.
Jenkins fought the application on the grounds that the case was already before the court in Vermont.
In 2007, the Vermont Supreme Court unanimously concluded that “under well-established laws designed to protect children and families” the Vermont Family Court properly ordered visitation between Janet and her daughter.
Liberty Counsel appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which refused to hear the case. But the battle did not end there.
The case then returned to the Virginia Supreme Court which ruled in June that the Vermont high court’s ruling should stand. The court cited the federal Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act, which says custody orders of one state must be enforced in other states.
But Miller returned to a lower court in Virginia, requesting a halt in the visitation order.
Frederick County Circuit Judge John Prosser dismissed the application saying the courts had already ruled and Miller presented no new evidence to reopen the case.
Liberty Counsel appealed again to the Virginia Supreme Court which refused to hear the case. In its second appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, Liberty Counsel said the Virginia Supreme Court improperly ignored a state law and constitutional amendment that prohibit same-sex unions and the recognition of such arrangements from other states.
By not taking the case, the Supreme Court left it to Family Court in Vermont to determine the details of visitation.





pat,
As an aside and FYI:
On January 27, 2008, Penny Boudreau took her 12 year old daughter into the country and stangled her to death.
According to the mother the childs last words were “Mommy don’t”.
Hyper-protective parents eventually get burned when their children reach the teenage years and start rebeling. It’s too bad that negative feedback can’t be felt right away.
Wow. IT’s really reassuring to know that lesbians can do this just like breeders. Meanwhile. Miller is no longer gay and has a christian lawyer?
Why is it that these people turn into traitors? I wish I could run into her in a dark virginia bar.
As a lesbian i have to say that it is very unselfish for the none biological mother to want access to this kid. This whole thing is just not logical as the kid is in no part hers. If i had a partner who had a child and we broke up (even if it was because she had met a man), i would let her go(because i would see it as a weight off my shoulders). This is because in my opinion(as someone who does not want a kid myself) when you are with a woman who has a kid she is the one who is the parent to that kid. The only role for her partner is to be supportive to her. If she decides she does not want you around and you have spent years helping to bring up the kid then you have been had, simple as. This kid will never see its self as having too mothers, instead it is going to want to know who its dad was. I am not being hetrosexist by saying this, its just a biological fact. Why do some lesbians need to play mom and dad together, its plain biological stupidity. I can see darwin in all this, as it is a genetic advantage if you can trick someone who is not the childs parent to contribute resources. So for all those lesbians out there who are keen to take on the supportive parent role. All that is happening is that you are being had by someone who wants to pass on there DNA while you as a genome get nothing back. This from a biological point of view puts you above the average man as most men would avoid bringing up another mans kid. Even the men who act as step dads still have the chance of getting some kids of there own out of the woman. A lesbian never does its a form of biological altruism, there are many lifeforms that have become extinct simply because they have been exploited by other more selfish life forms, not because they were wrong in any way.