<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iowa couples start getting married</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/news/iowa-couples-start-getting-married/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/iowa-couples-start-getting-married/</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:42:34 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: occono</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/iowa-couples-start-getting-married/comment-page-1/#comment-54031</link>
		<dc:creator>occono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=6926#comment-54031</guid>
		<description>Jax, Under the Federal DOMA Gay married couples still get 1,138 less rights then a Straight Married couple, so there&#039;s no true equality yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jax, Under the Federal DOMA Gay married couples still get 1,138 less rights then a Straight Married couple, so there&#8217;s no true equality yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jax</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/iowa-couples-start-getting-married/comment-page-1/#comment-53970</link>
		<dc:creator>Jax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=6926#comment-53970</guid>
		<description>From a Canadian who knows how it feels to be equal, CONGRATULATIONS!! Welcome to the human race Iowa!!

WOOT WOOT!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a Canadian who knows how it feels to be equal, CONGRATULATIONS!! Welcome to the human race Iowa!!</p>
<p>WOOT WOOT!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The M</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/iowa-couples-start-getting-married/comment-page-1/#comment-53960</link>
		<dc:creator>The M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=6926#comment-53960</guid>
		<description>Knowing Iowa... this is probably a way for the government to track and target homosexuals in that state. I fear for them frankly. Be careful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knowing Iowa&#8230; this is probably a way for the government to track and target homosexuals in that state. I fear for them frankly. Be careful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: everett</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/iowa-couples-start-getting-married/comment-page-1/#comment-53920</link>
		<dc:creator>everett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=6926#comment-53920</guid>
		<description>Congratulations to all the newly married and soon to be married couples in Iowa!!!! 

The Des Moines Register has some 160 photos of the folks standing outside today waiting to apply for marriage licenses. What struck me about the pictures was how entirely Midwestern these couples and their supporters looked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to all the newly married and soon to be married couples in Iowa!!!! </p>
<p>The Des Moines Register has some 160 photos of the folks standing outside today waiting to apply for marriage licenses. What struck me about the pictures was how entirely Midwestern these couples and their supporters looked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryo</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/iowa-couples-start-getting-married/comment-page-1/#comment-53877</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=6926#comment-53877</guid>
		<description>Kristie,
Thanks for the response.  Yes, I understood the can of worms that went along with it, but I guess I misunderstood just what the article meant by &quot;is unlikely&quot;.  My initial thought was that they were saying the constitutional convention was unlikely to get on a ballot, but perhaps the article meant it was unlikely to pass and be held.  I 100% expect the convention to get on the ballot to be voted on, but for some reason when I read that in the article it made me think that the anti-marriage people had lost their momentum and were starting to drop the idea of a convention.  I was getting excited for a second. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kristie,<br />
Thanks for the response.  Yes, I understood the can of worms that went along with it, but I guess I misunderstood just what the article meant by &#8220;is unlikely&#8221;.  My initial thought was that they were saying the constitutional convention was unlikely to get on a ballot, but perhaps the article meant it was unlikely to pass and be held.  I 100% expect the convention to get on the ballot to be voted on, but for some reason when I read that in the article it made me think that the anti-marriage people had lost their momentum and were starting to drop the idea of a convention.  I was getting excited for a second. <img src='http://www.365gay.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristie</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/iowa-couples-start-getting-married/comment-page-1/#comment-53850</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 18:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=6926#comment-53850</guid>
		<description>Ryo, 
a constitutional convention is thought unlikely because although it would open up the state constitution to be amended banning gay marriage it would also open the constition to revision on a number of other issues that conservative Iowans are not in favor of (such as legalized drugs). There is the fear that is that door is opened for a ban on same-sex marriage other more serious issues could slip through in the process and the oppotion is probably not likely to want to take that risk, just to stop same-sex couples from marrying in Iowa.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryo,<br />
a constitutional convention is thought unlikely because although it would open up the state constitution to be amended banning gay marriage it would also open the constition to revision on a number of other issues that conservative Iowans are not in favor of (such as legalized drugs). There is the fear that is that door is opened for a ban on same-sex marriage other more serious issues could slip through in the process and the oppotion is probably not likely to want to take that risk, just to stop same-sex couples from marrying in Iowa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drewski</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/iowa-couples-start-getting-married/comment-page-1/#comment-53846</link>
		<dc:creator>drewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=6926#comment-53846</guid>
		<description>Congratulations to all these Iowa couples!  Go make history!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to all these Iowa couples!  Go make history!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryo</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/iowa-couples-start-getting-married/comment-page-1/#comment-53845</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=6926#comment-53845</guid>
		<description>&quot;A constitutional convention could be called earlier, but that is unlikely.&quot;

Unlikely?  Why is it deemed unlikely?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A constitutional convention could be called earlier, but that is unlikely.&#8221;</p>
<p>Unlikely?  Why is it deemed unlikely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
