March 19th, 2010
 

365 Gay: News

Hawaii Senate passes civil unions bill


(Honolulu) The Hawaii Senate approved same-sex civil unions Friday, potentially setting up the measure for final passage as soon as next week.

The Senate passed the bill on an 18-7 vote, moving it to the House and signaling that the Senate’s Democratic majority has enough votes to override a possible veto from Republican Gov. Linda Lingle.

The House has yet to decide if it will vote on the bill. House leaders say they will take up the bill if they have a veto-proof two-thirds majority but may let it die if they have only a small majority.

“It’s very close,” said Democratic Speaker of the House Calvin Say. “During an election year, this issue is so divisive that it may hurt many of our members.”

The bill would grant gay and straight couples the same rights and benefits the state provides to married couples.

Five other states – Colorado, Wisconsin, Maryland, Maine and New Jersey – allow civil unions. Five states – Iowa, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts and Connecticut – permit same-sex marriage.

Civil union supporters wearing rainbow-colored lei cheered from the Senate gallery when the vote count was announced, while opponents in white shirts and “iVote” buttons quietly walked out.

“I’m very happy. It’s not marriage, but it gives us an opportunity to be recognized as a couple,” Carlos Quintana of Honolulu said.

The vote follows a rally at the Capitol last weekend attended by thousands of people supporting traditional marriage between a man and a woman. Protesters urged lawmakers to vote down civil unions and promised repercussions during this year’s elections to those who didn’t.

Lingle has urged the Legislature to drop the issue but hasn’t said whether she would sign the measure. The House passed last year’s bill but fell one vote short of a two-thirds majority.

“The state Senate is clearly at odds with the people of Hawaii,” said Republican Lt. Gov. James “Duke” Aiona, who is running for governor. “Like other movements across the country, voters will have the final say on election day.”

Senators said in speeches before the vote that same-sex unions are a matter of basic civil rights. Many compared civil unions to civil rights movements for racial minorities.

“I see nothing in this measure that denies, hurts or harms traditional marriage,” said Democratic Sen. Roz Baker. “What I see is an acknowledgment that there are all kinds of families, that there are all kinds of relationships and all of those deserve to be treated equally under the law.”

Hawaii’s Legislature almost passed civil unions last year when liberal senators forced a vote on the issue following a tied committee vote.

But in the waning hours of the session, the Senate’s majority amended the bill so that civil unions could apply to both homosexual and heterosexual couples.

Because that decision came only one day before the Legislature adjourned for the year, a final vote was delayed until this year to satisfy public notice requirements.


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • DJAlexander89 Said: January 25th, 2010 at 9:24 am
    • Well it’s something isn’t it? so there are 11 states that have some form of recognition. i hope those 33 states that banned it either get there bans overturned or just fail economically.

  • wahoo Said: January 25th, 2010 at 9:25 am
    • Oh how luke-warm this little nugget is.

  • Ginelle Said: January 25th, 2010 at 12:16 pm
    • It is still not a marriage and as long as we keep accepting these crumbs, then that is all we are going to get and we will never achieve the full equality we deserve! With countries throughout the world such as The Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Canada, South Africa, Norway and Sweden as well as several American States already providing full equal marriage rights, it is absolute proof that legislation can be changed despite the whining of religion and conservatives.

  • Morgan Said: January 25th, 2010 at 1:23 pm
    • Ginelle and wahoo,

      Civll Unions are better than no recognition at all. Civil unions in Vermont, Connecticut and New Hampshire got converted into marriage equality for those states. Even though that didn’t happen for New Jersey civil unions this time around at end of 2009 and at beginning of 2010.

  • SteveMD2 Said: January 27th, 2010 at 12:38 am
    • Lots of other states have civil unions or domestic partnerships. Oregon, Washington, CA (DPs), Nevada, NJ, etc.

  • SteveMD2 Said: January 27th, 2010 at 12:47 am
    • I’m sorry for all the people who say CUs are crumbs. I dumped about $53,000 into CA and ME, money I should have given to my wife to fix up the house, and my kids.

      I simply don’t see “marriage” happening soon, in places where there is a referendum process or where the psychopaths of right wing christianity can browbeat legislatures.

      WA state showed that you can get a majority for full recognition under a different name, as long as there are large progressive city populations.

      And the real issue is not marriage at all. The real issue is breaking the church’es tyrannical closet. Surveys show a 25% increase in support for gay people in general, when people know gays and respect them, vs when they don’t know gays.

      Sorry. I wish I had a magic wand that would send to hell the hierarchy of the catholic church, and make slaves of all the crazy hatefilled christians, who hate gays, and who are graduates of the old southern culture of slavery and segregation.

      The fundamental problem re the Catholic church – it is dead in europe, dying in Latin America, and America is the last hope of the ChurchFuhrer. BTW, there are tens of millions of good Catholics who should just leave the church period, and not give it a red cent.

      As for the so called chritians, they will not go to hell soon enough. Our biggest mistake was not having a Nuremburg tribunal after the civil war, to take care of the people who caused it.

      While gays

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook