Hawaii civil union bill moves to Senate
02.24.2009 8:26am EST
(Honolulu, Hawaii) Hawaii, the state that adopted the nation’s first “defense of marriage” constitutional amendment a decade ago, has now become the latest battleground in the fight for same-sex civil unions.
It would become the fifth state to legalize the so-called alternative to gay marriage if the Democrat-dominated Legislature and Republican governor approve a civil union law. The measure was passed by the state House this month but it now faces the Senate, where a divided committee is to vote Tuesday.Republican Gov. Linda Lingle has declined to comment on the issue and it’s unclear whether she would veto the bill.
Gay rights organizations argue that civil unions would promote basic equality in the nation’s most ethnically diverse state, but opponents fear the erosion of an island culture that values conventional family ties.
“Society in general is becoming more accepting,” said Suzanne King, a real estate office manager who is raising her 9-year-old daughter, Shylar Young, with her partner of nearly 28 years, Tambry Young. “It’s not unusual to come upon a gay family. There isn’t this fear that by giving us rights, it’s going to reduce the traditional family.”
King and Young said they want a civil union law so gay couples can more easily adopt children, share health benefits and gain hospital visitation rights. They plan to enter into a civil union if the measure becomes law.
Religious groups have been taking out newspaper ads, setting up Web sites and holding rallies urging lawmakers to preserve traditional marriage.
One anti-gay Web site includes photos of two men kissing each other and others apparently in gay pride parades. It warns of a bad influence on Hawaii “keiki,” the Hawaiian word for children.
The Mormon church, which campaigned in California last year for a gay marriage ban, has not openly rallied opposition to civil unions in Hawaii this year. But some members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints have been sharing e-mails urging people to calls their legislators opposing the bill.
“In Hawaii, people still believe in traditional marriage and the sanctity of marriage,” said Dennis Arakaki, executive director of the Hawaii Family Forum, which also represents the Hawaii Catholic Conference. “There’s no indication that values or perspectives have changed.”
Several thousand people gathered at the state Capitol on Sunday for a demonstration organized by Arakaki’s group.
Protesters held signs saying “We affirm traditional marriage” and “No to same sex marriage” while listening to speakers in the Capitol’s open-air rotunda. Others signed petitions opposing the bill.
“We’re gathered here because we want our voices heard,” Wayne Cordeiro, senior pastor of New Hope Christian Fellowship in Honolulu, said to loud cheers from the crowd.
Rally volunteer Julia Sula said she came to the demonstration with 200 to 300 other members of her Waipahu church, the Lighthouse Outreach Center.
“We believe in traditional marriage: a woman to a man. Not `man to a man’ and `woman to a woman,’” said Sula, a 65-year-old retired social worker.
Only Massachusetts and Connecticut allow gay marriage, while Vermont, Connecticut, New Jersey and New Hampshire allow civil unions. Californians voted in November to overturn a court ruling that allowed gay marriage, but the state still offers domestic partnerships that guarantee the same rights as marriage.
That means Hawaii could become the only Western state to give governmental blessing to same-sex unions.
“Our wedding industry would have a huge potential increase in business purely because there are people who would rather come to the islands rather than go to the East Coast to have a civil union performed,” said the Rev. Mike John Hough of Kauai Island Weddings. “Some people say it’s just marriage by another name, and that may be true. It’s a perfect compromise.”
In 1998, nearly 70 percent of Hawaii voters approved a constitutional amendment granting the state Legislature the power to reserve marriage for opposite-sex couples. The “defense of marriage” amendment, now in more than half of state constitutions, resulted in a law banning gay marriage in Hawaii but left the door open for civil unions.
The amendment negated a 1993 Hawaii Supreme Court ruling that found refusing to grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples was discriminatory.
Since 1998, Hawaii’s Legislature has considered civil unions several times, most recently in 2007, but the bills never made it out of their committees.
This year, the House Judiciary Committee passed the measure by a 12-0 vote, and the full House approved it 33-17, one vote short of the two-thirds majority needed to override a potential veto.
Attitudes have changed, said state Rep. Blake Oshiro, who sponsored this year’s bill.
“People are more tolerant and accepting of diversity and recognizing the need for equality,” said Oshiro, a Democrat.




Aloha Friends,
We were distressed to read:
“Hawaii, the state that adopted the nation’s first “defense of marriage” constitutional amendment a decade ago”
This is true enough but omits that this sad effect was the result of Hawaii being the FIRST to open the question in Baehr v Lewin. The early bird gets it in the neck.
Ward and George
54 years together,
And yet
Strangers before the law
“Opponents fear the erosion of an island culture that values conventional family ties” – “In Hawaii, people still believe in traditional marriage and the sanctity of marriage” – evidently, these people only know what the Christian missionaries preached while they were raping the Hawaiian islands and stealing the land from the native Hawaiians. If they bothed to study ancient Hawaiian culture, they would have a better idea of what was accepted to the Hawaiians. There were many elements to the culture, and “conventional family” was more accepting and beautiful than what is being preached today.
“Our wedding industry would have a huge potential increase in business purely because there are people who would rather come to the islands rather than go to the East Coast to have a civil union performed…Some people say it’s just marriage by another name, and that may be true. It’s a perfect compromise.”
Please. I’d rather get married in MA or CT than get a civil union in HI. Civil Unions just don’t work the way they are supposed to. That said, I think that this is a good step towards full marriage equality in HI.
Hawaii amended its constitution to ensure that marriage would be “protected”. Seeing as the state accomplished this (in the eyes of the bigots), what are they trying to “protect” now by opposing civil unions?
Lets hope this passes the Senate!!
And CA still does have 18,000 married same sex couples! I to am for “Traditonal Marriage” for Heteros !
It makes my head hurt how these people say we want to destroy marriage just because we want the same rights. All of my strait married friends feel no less married because my now legal spouse and I went to the court house and got a paper giving us the same rights, after being together since 1994.
Tom in Long Beach
What happened to domestic partnerships for same-sex Washington state couples that WA gov Gregoire signed into law? They haven’t disappeared just because another journalistic outfit failed to do its homework completely enough before putting its article out for public comsumption. And Washington State hasn’t sufficiently shifted its geographical west coast location enough as of late to stop being a western state. So Hawaii isn’t the only western state trying to do things to recognize its same-sex couples. CA used to have marriage equality and may one day regain it. If the CA Supreme Court rules in the favor of same-sex couples.
When referring to marriage for gay people, I would refrain from saying gay marriage, it’s not a gay marriage, it’s equality for gay people to have the same marriage rights as all others, (marriage equality). You don’t read news articles that say straight marriage, black marriage or opposite sex marriage. This is a equal rights issue and should be stated as such. MARRIAGE EQUALITY FOR GAY PEOPLE.