July 10th, 2009
 

365 Gay: News

GOP, Dems battle over Pa. voter dress code


(Harrisburg, Pennsylvania) Sue Nace thought election volunteers were joking when they told her she would have to remove her T-shirt to vote in the presidential primary last spring.

But it was no laughing matter to the poll workers-turned-fashion police, who said Nace’s Obama shirt was inappropriate electioneering - and made her cover the writing before casting a ballot.

Now, a political fight over what voters can wear to the polls is headed to court in Pennsylvania - with the Republican Party favoring a dress code and Democrats opposed.

To the GOP, the lack of rules could open the door to all kinds of questionable displays - even, one Republican leader suggested, something as outlandish as a musical hat.

To the Democrats, voters should be free to express themselves. They fear a dress code could scare away some new voters.

The political showdown was triggered by a Pennsylvania Department of State memo advising counties last month that voters’ attire doesn’t matter as long as the “voter takes no additional action to attempt to influence other voters.”

Because the memo is not legally binding, some counties have kept past restrictions on clothing and political buttons.

But two Pittsburgh-area elections officials sued to have the memo rescinded. Their lawsuit warned that if the memo stands, “nothing would prevent a partisan group from synchronizing a battalion of like-minded individuals … to descend on a polling place, presenting a domineering, united front, certain to dissuade the average citizen who may privately hold different beliefs.”

This fight over the interpretation of a state law designed to shield the polls from partisan electioneering could determine which presidential candidate’s supporters might be turned away from the polls in this battleground state.

Democrats have benefited from a surge in voter registration this year, with young adults 18-24 making up the largest group of new registrants, according to statistics from March 30 to Sept. 8. A poll released Wednesday by Quinnipiac University showed Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama pulling 15 percentage points ahead of Republican John McCain in the state.

State Democratic Party Chairman T.J. Rooney said GOP support for the dress code is a partisan effort to scare away new voters.

“To go (to the polls) and engage in an expression of democracy and then be accosted by the fashion police is a form of voter intimidation,” he said.

The state Republican Party says Democratic Gov. Ed Rendell’s administration crafted a partisan memo that would open the door to abuses.

“The first thing would be a button or a shirt, and maybe the next thing would be a musical hat,” said GOP chairman Robert Gleason, who called a news conference in support of dress codes.

Douglas Hill, head of Pennsylvania’s association of county commissioners, believes the state’s 67 counties are now evenly split on the question. Before the memo, counties leaned toward banning politically polarizing clothing and buttons because “they didn’t want to get into fine-line disputes,” he said.

Nace, a 44-year-old Obama supporter, hopes the state’s recommendation will stand so she can vote Nov. 4 while wearing her political leanings on her sleeve.

“Especially with this election, for some reason it feels very personal to me,” she said. “Even when I see another car with a bumper sticker on it, it’s like, ‘Yeah, they get it.’”

During the April 22 primary, Nace was allowed into the voting booth in York County only after she rolled up her Obama T-shirt to hide the writing. After the state memo came out, York County rescinded its ban.

At least four states - Maine, Montana, Vermont and Kansas- explicitly prohibit wearing campaign buttons, stickers and badges inside polling places, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures and state officials.

In Kentucky, elections officials last month told poll workers they should admit voters decked out in campaign apparel, after e-mails circulated warning that Obama supporters would be turned away if they wore shirts and pins.


Comments (6)
  • Peter-Nicholas Said: October 6th, 2008 at 9:24 am
    • Leave it to the evil republicans
      to come up with another way to
      disenfranchise voters, mostly
      minorities who have been stopped
      from voting in the past from
      people like this. And they go to
      church! Shame on them and may they
      and their kind be punished!

  • Jon Said: October 6th, 2008 at 11:31 am
    • As one watching the election from north of the border, all I can say is; how the mighty have fallen. Has America really come to this?! Is the freedom that once existed there completely gone? Sad…..so very very sad.

  • Bob from Arlington, VA Said: October 6th, 2008 at 11:38 am
    • When you’re in the voting booth, you can’t SEE anything, so what does it matter what people wear?

      I can understand about “musical hats”. Anything that has to do with the sense of sight is not going to bother someone sitting in a voter booth. But what about the other senses? Hearing, that is distracting, smell, that’s just disgusting, touch, well you do need to know which button/lever/what-have-you you’re pushing, and taste, well that’s just unsanitary. Though, this does leave the opportunity to blind someone before they reach the voting booth!

  • jibii Said: October 6th, 2008 at 11:56 am
    • Oh, thank you Republicans, for guarding me from the nebulous and evil “what if”s!

      Is any person seriously going to change their vote simply because a bunch of other people are wearing shirts supporting a candidate? Pfft.

  • Morgan Said: October 6th, 2008 at 12:20 pm
    • Just ridiculous, who cares as long “the private” areas of skin are covered?

      and while we are on “and they go to church” I am a church-going gay liberal Democrat concerned about environment, global warming, the needy, public transportation alternatives, clean energy where possible, and about social justice for the least of our society.. the stereotypes about church goers are just that, stereotypes. I (and many other people regardless of sexual orientation) do not fit the stereotypes so many gay people have here of church- Church-goers are just as varied as anyone else.

  • Jay from Nashville Said: October 6th, 2008 at 2:16 pm
    • Does the Constitution say something about “no shirt, no shoes, no vote?” So, a possee of old busybodies can congregate at a polling location and toss out voters who don’t dress the way they like? Do we have to wear a Dick Cheney-style blue dress coat and a smirk to get in? If grandma does’t like my earrings, do I get the boot? Yep, the Repubs are looking for a new way to scare off people who “don’t look like them”. Maybe we could have Carson Kressley at the door to stop people still wearing yellow 80s power ties and 1970s blow-dried evangelist hair.