November 22nd, 2009
 

365 Gay: News

`Glee’ wheelchair episode hits bump with disabled


(Los Angeles) The glee club members twirl their wheelchairs to the tune of “Proud Mary” and in joyful solidarity with Artie, the fellow performer who must use his chair even when the music stops.

The scene in Wednesday’s episode of the hit Fox series “Glee,” which regularly celebrates diversity and the underdog, is yet another uplifting moment – except to those in the entertainment industry with disabilities and their advocates.

For them, the casting of a non-disabled actor to play the paraplegic high school student is another blown chance to hire a performer who truly fits the role.

“I think there’s a fear of litigation, that a person with disabilities might slow a production down, fear that viewers might be uncomfortable,” said Robert David Hall, longtime cast member of CBS’ “CSI: Crime Scene Investigation.”

All of that is nonsense, said Hall: “I’ve made my living as an actor for 30 years and I walk on two artificial legs.”

Hall, 61, chair of a multi-union committee for performers with disabilities, is part of a small band of such steadily working actors on TV that includes Daryl “Chill” Mitchell, star of Fox’s “Brothers”; teenager RJ Mitte of AMC’s “Breaking Bad”; and ABC’s “Private Practice” newcomer Michael Patrick Thornton.

Veteran actress Geri Jewell, who has cerebral palsy, appeared on HBO’s now-departed “Deadwood.”

Mitchell, 44, whose credits included “Veronica’s Closet” and the film “Galaxy Quest” before he was injured in a motorcycle accident and “Ed” after he began using a wheelchair, is also a producer on the Sunday sitcom that’s in need of higher ratings if it is to survive.

For Mitchell, “Brothers” represents more than just another show: He calls it “a movement” that deserves support from the wider disabled community as well as the industry.

“This is what my life is. This is what I want the world to see,” he said. “I want to hold the networks accountable. If I can come out and do what I’m doing, they can come to the table.”

It’s not just TV that falls short of what Mitchell and others seek, including auditioning those with disabilities for roles that echo their situation and for roles in which it is irrelevant. (Then it’s up to them to prove they deserve the job, Hall said.)

In the theater world, advocacy groups for the disabled recently objected to the casting of Abigail Breslin (”Little Miss Sunshine”) as young Helen Keller in a Broadway revival of “The Miracle Worker,” and a hearing actor’s selection for a deaf role in the off-Broadway “The Heart Is a Lonely Hunter.”

In films, Daniel Day-Lewis received an Academy Award for his portrayal of a man with severe cerebral palsy in “My Left Foot” and Tom Cruise was nominated for an Oscar for playing a paralyzed Vietnam veteran in “Born on the Fourth of July.”

Television, however, has a unique place in the country’s cultural and social fiber. It deals in volume, is entrenched in most lives as it consumes hours of leisure time and has the daily power to reinforce attitudes or reshape them. Increasingly, it’s been expected to reflect America in whole and not just the so-called mainstream.

That was the intent in assembling the cast of “Glee,” said executive producer Brad Falchuk, along with getting the best performers possible.

“We brought in anyone: white, black, Asian, in a wheelchair,” he said. “It was very hard to find people who could really sing, really act, and have that charisma you need on TV.”

He understands the concern and frustration expressed by the disabled community, he said. But Kevin McHale, 21, who plays Artie, excels as an actor and singer and “it’s hard to say no to someone that talented,” Falchuk said.

“Glee” isn’t alone in using an able-bodied actor for a wheelchair role: “Curb Your Enthusiasm” did it twice in a recent episode.

While TV has grown more inclusive of ethnic and gay characters, those with disabilities represent a sizable minority that hasn’t fared as well – whether with genuine or fake portrayals.

About one-fifth of Americans age 5 to 64 have a physical or mental disability – more than 50 million, according to U.S. Census figures. But fewer than 2 percent of the characters on TV reflect that reality, according to a 2005 study of Screen Actors Guild members conducted by researchers at the University of California, Los Angeles.

And it’s not a small playing field: There are 600 characters or more on the scripted comedies and dramas airing on the five major networks in a typical season.

More than a third of performers with disabilities reported facing discrimination in the workplace, either being refused an audition or not being cast for a role because of their disability, the study found. Many performers fear being candid about their health or needs to avoid pity or being seen as incapable of doing a job.

There can be added production expenses, said veteran casting director Sheila Manning, such as hiring a translator for a performer who is deaf.

“It costs a little more, but look at the positive reaction they’re (the networks) getting. I think that more than offsets the cost,” Manning said, adding that it’s the morally right thing to do.

And producers simply can’t complain of a shallow pool of choices.

“There are very talented performers with disabilities. … We just don’t know what producers are thinking,” said Gloria Castaneda, program director of the Media Access Office, a California state program that promotes hiring of the disabled in the entertainment industry. It also gives annual awards for positive portrayals.

The cause has union support: A campaign sponsored by three major entertainment guilds and aimed at creating equal employment opportunities for actors, broadcasters and recording artists just marked its first year.

TV’s past, oddly enough, was brighter. In the 1980s, actors with disabilities could be seen regularly in a variety of shows. They included Jewell, who costarred on “Facts of Life,” and James Stacy, who played a love interest for Sharon Gless on “Cagney & Lacey” and appeared in “Wiseguy” after losing limbs in a motorcycle crash.

R.J. Johnson, a writer and filmmaker, documented the golden period in “Breaking Ground.” Among those interviewed in the film was an actress who proclaimed, “We’re never going back. It won’t happen.”

Johnson says that “everything aligned” to encourage producers and directors such as Michael Landon (”Highway to Heaven”) to create characters with disabilities and then hire the right actors to play them.

“Then it kind of faded away,” says casting pro Manning. “It was a cause, and then it wasn’t.”

But she sounded a note of optimism, saying, “It’s in the public consciousness again, so it’s in the production consciousness.”

A friend was on the mind of Vince Gilligan, executive director of “Breaking Bad,” when the role of Walter Jr. was formed. Gilligan said he was thinking of a dear college pal, a man “with an infectious personality,” who died in recent years.

“It must have been I wanted to represent him in such a fashion when I created the character of Walter Jr.,” Gilligan told a recent industry forum on the hiring and portrayal of people with disabilities. “There was no reason for him to have cerebral palsy. It just seemed like, ‘Why Not?’ There’s no better reason than that, I suppose.”

More is at stake than actors’ careers, say advocates.

“When a person with a disability sees a positive image on TV that looks like them, their whole attitude changes. It gives them hope for what they can do in the future,” said Castaneda of the Media Access Office.

It counts for their families as well, said veteran writer Janis Hirsch, who works on Fox’s “Brothers” and “‘Til Death,” and who had polio as an infant.

“I am sick and tired of my son not seeing anyone even remotely like me on TV,” she said. “The first time my son saw someone use forearm crutches was the giraffe puppet in ‘Lion King.’ He was so excited. Where else do you see it? You just don’t see it.”


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • FAII Said: November 13th, 2009 at 8:43 am
    • Much ado about nothing. The outraged disabled people seem to have forgotten that Glee requires its actors to be able to sing. So can they cough up a wheelchair-bound actor who could pass for a high school student but also sing really well? Because I there are LOADS of them in the business who were passed over by Ryan Murphy (it’s not like there weren’t auditions!)!

  • psyberninja Said: November 12th, 2009 at 10:20 am
    • Two things:
      1) The auditions were open. That’s awesome.
      2) HELLO?! Why is there absolutely NO mention of the two DOWN SYNDROME ACTRESSES?! What were THEY? Chopped liver? Come ON!

  • pkrtbx Said: November 12th, 2009 at 1:07 am
    • Whatever happened to hiring the person that best performs the role?

  • michaelandfred Said: November 11th, 2009 at 6:49 pm
    • Agreed. It’s ACTING, if you want reality, go watch a reality show. I’m assuming if “the best” person who auditioned had been a disabled, wheel chair bound person he probably would have gotten the job. But this is an acting job. I guess Cyntia Nixon better quit Sex and the City since she’s a lesbian playing a married heterosexual. Political correctness can go too far, and usually does.

  • nurmihusa Said: November 11th, 2009 at 5:56 pm
    • As “Facebook User” has pointedly asked – are we to only allow gay actors to play gay characters and straight actors to play straight characters? That’s horrifying nonsense. I happen to be an actor who happens to be gay. Am I only to be allowed to play gay men? Lordknows there are actors who CAN only play gay men – but I mark that down to their their own lack of range as an actor. I once played (and quite successfully) Hermann Göring, Hitler’s #2 goto guy. Was I wrong to do that? Should only a Nazi been permitted to play that role? Oh, dear, I’ve also played Karl Marx and I’m neither a Jew nor a Communist. Have I erred yet again?

      Oh, please. The only PERTINENT question is whether the actor playing the character in the wheelchair did a credible job of it. Listen, when a wheelchair bound actor auditions for and ultimately plays a role that wasn’t written as a wheelchair bound character THAT’s the victory!!! And these sort of victories ARE happening all the time! These days we have actors who happen to be female playing roles that were written for males. Actors of “color” playing roles that were written, ahem, *colorlessly*. Are these things happening often enough, probably not. But that’s where we should be putting our activist efforts. Not into locking ourselves into a casting ghetto.

      Or we should go further and demand that male writers mustn’t be allowed to write for women and vice versa. Damn that Shakespeare!!! How dare he write about a Moor and his white wife??!!! Whoever he actually was (Marlowe, Bacon or Himself) he certainly was neither a Moor nor a woman. Surely you will join me in denouncing it a travesty that he was permitted to write about something he had not personally experienced. And what a disgraceful hack job he did of it?! Fortunately he was not permitted to write of Jews – oh, wait, he DID, didn’t he? And, ahem, rather poignantly. Still, though, he shouldn’t have been permitted to do so. What a slap in the face of the Jewish community of Elizabethan Southwark?! Happily we are ever so much more wise and sensitive these days.

      Sigh. Shoot the enemy, sweet things, not your own feetes. HELLLLOOOO!???!

  • gaymarriagetruth Said: November 11th, 2009 at 5:40 pm
    • Oh gimme a frickin’ break!

      Whatever happened to being grateful for blessings where you find them? Glee has a primary cast member who is disabled, and even has an episode that highlights this to teach the other characters what it is like to BE in a wheelchair.

      Are people grateful about this? No! Instead, they choose to bitch and moan because the actor portraying the character is not actually disabled.

      Grow up people and count your blessings. Instead of making the most out of something positive you have now just made yourselves look like utter fools, and completely ungrateful ones at that. The whole point of being an actor is portraying characteristics that you, yourself, don’t have. The flip side of that is that some characters will be played by people who (gasp!) aren’t actually of the type portrayed! This does not, in any way conceivable, lessen the meaning of the character – it simply is what it is.

      Shame on you. Sour grapes for not getting the role should not trump a truly momentous moment in network history.

  • judderwocky Said: November 11th, 2009 at 5:31 pm
    • i don’t think any human – regardless of their history – is so fundamentally different that they cannot be portrayed by a skillful actor.

  • plover Said: November 11th, 2009 at 12:38 pm
    • saying that someone in a wheelchair should get priority for a role portraying a person in a wheelchair, or yes, even having a gay man play a gay man, it not the same as saying only straight men should play straight roles.

      Straight men are not marginalized. They are not oppressed, nor are they considered “exotic.” Everyone in our culture is expected to be familiar with what a straight man looks like/sounds like/acts like, and when we see a portrayal of a high voiced straight man, we don’t say: “ahh, all straight men have high pitched voices.”

      When we have non-disabled actors playing disabled roles, or straight actors playing gay roles, we have people in the majority projecting their majority-based view of those in the minority. And others in the majority watching those characters DO look at them and go, “ahh, all that man’s gay because he has a high pitched voice.” Maybe if you had a gay man playing that role, he would have a high pitched voice, but that would be because it was HIS voice, not because someone decided gay men are effeminate.

      In a show where there are many gay folks, like in Queer as Folk or the L Word, I don’t think it’s a problem to have straight and gay actors playing the roles, but in most shows, where you have one character, and therefore a single view of the minority group, I think handing that role to the minority actor (provided they have the skill) is the way to go. Not making excuses about how, “if we used someone who was ACTUALLY in a wheelchair, we would have to deal with their disability!

      If you want to portray acceptance, you should practice it.

  • Facebook User Said: November 11th, 2009 at 9:53 am
    • So by that logic, Randy, you’re implying that only gay men should play gay roles and straight men should play straight roles? I guess Calista Flockhart better go catch lymphoma rather quickly if she’s to play her “Brothers and Sisters” character accurately.

      IMO, this is another PC Police non-issue trying to become an issue.

  • randy Said: November 11th, 2009 at 5:15 am
    • I haven’t seen this actor in other roles, so I assumed he was actually disabled. I am disappointed to learn they didn’t use a disabled actor.

      Although acting is acting, and theoretically anybody can play any role, there is something a little too false about that. There’s no escaping the simple reality that actors whose backgrounds are similar to their characters often give a better performance, even in a musical comedy.

      Given that there are so many talented actors who would love to play these roles, a disabled actor should have been given the part. This is no slight against the guy who got the role, and it’s too late to change the cast now. But in the future, I expect different.

  • Fred Stanley Said: November 10th, 2009 at 10:16 pm
    • I am disabled and use a wheelchair, and am very happy that we are being included in this popular TV series.

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook