February 9th, 2010
 

365 Gay: News

For born-again governor, love is a matter of faith


(Columbia, S.C.) In one especially soul-baring e-mail to his Argentine mistress, South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford quoted from 1 Corinthians 13 about the nature of love.

It is patient and kind, he wrote. It is NOT jealous or boastful.

The Christian counselors Sanford sought out while trying to decide whether to stay with his wife or jump on a plane to South America advised him what else love is and isn’t.

“Their point is that love is not a feeling,” Sanford told The Associated Press in a tearful two-day confessional. “It’s a choice. It’s an action.”

That sentiment might seem cold to many Americans, but it is perfectly consistent with the born-again, evangelical Christian world that Sanford inhabits, says sociologist John Bartowski.

“What evangelicals are doing is sort of carving out a subcultural view of love which is not so highly romanticized as we see in movies, that is at odds with the dominant view of love,” says Bartowski, a professor at the University of Texas at San Antonio and author of the book, “Remaking the Godly Marriage: Gender Negotiation in Evangelical Families.”

That world view, he says, “divorces” love from emotion, because “feelings are fleeting and not to be trusted.”

“Love is something that is cultivated in the trenches of living a day-to-day relationship,” says Bartowski. “That is not a Hallmark moment.”

So while there are countless romantics out there urging Sanford to follow his heart, he can expect mostly tough love from his own spiritual community.

“The emotions are the icing on the cake,” says Ben Witherington, a New Testament professor at Kentucky’s Asbury Theological Seminary. “They’re not the cake.”

Witherington says feelings are a “notoriously unreliable guide” in personal relationships because they tend to change with time. Marriage is not just a commitment of will, he says, but a commitment before God.

“That’s why, at a Christian wedding service, you don’t say, ‘I feel like’ and ‘I feel like.’ You say, ‘I will’ and ‘I will,’ ‘I do’ and ‘I do.’”

Sanford is a man writhing in agony as his emotions battle his sense of duty – to his wife, to their four sons, to his office.

In one e-mail to his lover, Maria Belen Chapur, Sanford said to “sleep soundly knowing that despite the best efforts of my head my heart cries out for you, your voice, your body, the touch of your lips, the touch of your finger tips and an even deeper connection to your soul.”

He told the AP on Tuesday that the past 8 1/2 years have been an emotional “wrestling match,” a struggle “between one’s heart and one’s value system.”

“A whole lot more than a simple affair,” he said. “It’s a love story. A forbidden one, a tragic one, but a love story at the end of the day.”

That is not how he talks of his bond with Jenny Sanford.

“I do have a love for my wife,” he told AP. “I do have a love for my boys. I do have a love for the farm. I do have a love for the world of ideas and politics.”

What has also become clear over the past few days is that Sanford has decided – at least for now – to take his friends’ advice and try to repair his marriage. The friend whose words appear to echo loudest is Warren “Cubby” Culbertson.

The owner of a court reporting business, Culbertson, 51, is an influential Bible study leader and considered a pillar of the state capital’s Christian community. Sanford told him about the affair immediately after his wife discovered it in January, and Culbertson has been counseling the couple ever since – even holding a monthlong spiritual “boot camp” at the governor’s mansion.

Culbertson told the AP he believes that “everybody’s vulnerable, and there are no boundaries on darkness.” He does not dine alone with other women and keeps his office door open when he has a female visitor.

He says he has counseled many men “who have fallen in the position that Mark’s in.”

“Everybody starts with the same exact story: ‘We got to be friends. We started talking. I didn’t mean for anything to happen,’” he says. “That’s exactly where a sin begins.”

Many times during the past week, Sanford has quoted Culbertson and others almost verbatim in describing where things went astray.

“It was innocent,” he said of his first meeting on a beachside Uruguayan dance floor with Chapur. “That was the beginning of sin right there. … If you’re a married guy, at the end of the day, you shouldn’t be dancing with somebody else.”

Culbertson has advised Sanford to stay with his wife. If Sanford works diligently, he believes the couple can find an even “greater love” than they once had.

The Rev. Gary Chapman agrees.

A senior associate pastor at Calvary Baptist Church in Winston-Salem, N.C., Chapman has been a marriage counselor for 35 years. He has written several books, most notably “The Five Love Languages.”

Chapman says Sanford is in the throes of what he calls the “in-love experience.”

“It’s not that there is not emotion involved in love,” he says. “But the ‘in-love’ experience is super emotion. It’s very euphoric. It doesn’t take any effort. You’re just pushed along by your emotions.”

That high doesn’t last, Chapman warns. Rather than seek that high over and over, he counsels couples to stick with the commitment they’ve already made and learn how to “keep love alive.”

A faded love can be reborn, he says. But it takes time – and work.

“You don’t sit around waiting for the emotional love to come back.”


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • Will Bowden Said: July 2nd, 2009 at 11:47 am
    • Oh.
      Fucking.
      Barf.

      And I mean that sincerely.

  • Island Boy Said: July 2nd, 2009 at 11:47 am
    • Woe is the man forced to love.

  • Peter Said: July 2nd, 2009 at 11:56 am
    • These people are truly SICK and the American Society of Psychiatrists says that religious fanatacism is a form of mental illness. See what you idiots in SC did by electing that asshole hypocrite. Obviously you haven’t learned from your mistakes since 1861!

  • Peter Said: July 2nd, 2009 at 12:08 pm
    • Sorry, that should have been 1860!

  • Wayne M. Said: July 2nd, 2009 at 12:10 pm
    • Sanford and other evangelical religious conservatives and Republicans always preach “traditional” values. Yet they are unfaithful to their own spouses. Yet they feel they have the right to deny Gay Men and Lesbians the right to enter into faithful same-sex marriages. How hypocritical! It seems to me that the real advocates of true traditional values come from the LGBT community.

  • Morgan Said: July 2nd, 2009 at 12:36 pm
    • His wife is going about this at least publicly as gracefully as she can saying that his career is not her concern and that she now has to look after their children, and that she and their kids need privacy for a while. She was supporting his political career very much before this “event” giving up her career to marry him, bear their children and help his career along. But now he is likely going to have to take care of his career without her help and support. This is what the Washington Post has reported over several days of covering this.

      He has 18 months left in his term as gov. Even if he wants to remain as gov, members of his own party are now turning against him and deserting him.

      We may see the collapse of his career and of his marriage before his remaining 18 months is over.

      My sympathy goes to his children. They don’t hold office or formulate his antigay policies.

  • Robert, NYC Said: July 2nd, 2009 at 12:37 pm
    • This dirt bag is a fucking hypocrite and a bigot in the truest sense of the word. If he’d been seeing a male, you can bet the right wingers would be having a field day with all kinds of denigrating comments, dehumanization and ridicule of his sexual orientation. They’re all a bunch mentally ill and psychopathic liars.

  • bryanKCMO Said: July 2nd, 2009 at 12:40 pm
    • I feel dumber after reading that article.

  • vanndean Said: July 2nd, 2009 at 12:57 pm
    • Why is this considered “news” to gay people?

  • Chris Said: July 2nd, 2009 at 1:24 pm
    • If love isn’t a feeling, if it isn’t an emotion does that mean feeling “DOG;” I mean god, and flopping on the floor like a fish or speaking bullshit isn’t a feeling either but a pathological symptom of insanity? Hmmm I think we’re on to something here.

  • drewski Said: July 2nd, 2009 at 1:39 pm
    • They may yet save their marriage–and if they do, good for them. It looks a lot like she’s done most of the giving, and he needs to realize that he’s setting a horrible example for his sons. In a way, I see the point of the “anti-emotion” take on love–you have to make an effort, you have to put something in, it’s not just spontaneous. That said, the concept of love presented here is awfully dry and severe; who the hell would wanna fight for it?

  • Andrew Said: July 2nd, 2009 at 1:59 pm
    • Culbertson told the AP he believes that “everybody’s vulnerable, and there are no boundaries on darkness.” He does not dine alone with other women and keeps his office door open when he has a female visitor.

      Is this guy an adult with rational thought, should we not let him on the street if he can’t even by his own admission not be alone in a room with the opposite sex. How completely unprofessional is this man. Or is his relationship with his wife that weak.

  • Julie Said: July 2nd, 2009 at 2:03 pm
    • What is sad and even pathetic is there are many people who will swallow this drivel and forgive him. It’s all about redemption with the born-agains. The problem with us is we have done nothing wrong from which to be redeemed therefore we cannot be forgiven by people like this.

      When will the mainstream allow themselves to become educated enough so they don’t fall for this kind of hypocrisy again?

  • Southernhemisphere Said: July 2nd, 2009 at 2:13 pm
    • Well maybe Mr. Sanford might want to read another book, though not as popular,titled “Wrestling with Angels” by Naomi Rosenblatt which explains the kind of discipline it takes to maintain a monogomous marital relationship.

  • Daniel S Said: July 2nd, 2009 at 2:32 pm
    • It’s actually rather funny when you think about it.

      Basically, the argument here is that these people want to be like Vulcans from Star Trek. For them, “love” is a burden and a duty, not a source of happiness. “Love” is when you’re successfully performing your gender roles as spouses and parents according to “God’s Plan”.

      It’s a very dreary worldview, which suggests that the purpose of marriage is to please God, not to attain any kind of personal happiness. Or at least that personal happiness comes from pleasing God and not from the human relationship itself.

      Looking at this a couple of things become clear. First, it makes sense why divorce rates are actually highest in the most religiously conservative states. Caught up in the notion of their marriages as a burden, it’s probable that many of their marriages, like Sanford’s, steadily decay in silence as they become almost like business relationships and they inevitably start looking else where for emotional succor.

      Secondly, it clarifies their opposition to same-sex marriage. In viewing marriage primarily as a religious duty with an eye towards procreation, they discount the notion of love as a basis for a marriage. If a marriage’s primary purpose is to just fulfill “God’s Will” and happiness is attained by doing what “God Wants” then anything else is just seen as selfish self-indulgence.

      No wonder they’re so angry and hostile! It’s hard to watch other people pursue happiness when you feel that you cannot do so yourself and, indeed, feel that the others are violating a universal law by pursuing their own happiness above “God’s Will”.

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook