July 9th, 2009
 

365 Gay: News

Florida AG prepares appeal in gay adoption case


(Tallahassee, Florida) The Florida Attorney General’s office is preparing to appeal a ruling by a Miami judge striking down the state ban on adoptions by gays and lesbians.

Florida Assistant  Attorney General Valerie Martin said the appeal would be filed on behalf of the state Department of Children & Families. Martin declined additional comment but it is widely believed the appeal will be filed before the end of the year.

No matter which way the appeals court rules, it is expected the case will end up in the Florida Supreme Court.

Florida law allows gays to serve as foster parents but not adopt. The law is considered the most repressive of its kind in the country. Some states bar same-sex couples from jointly adopting. Arkansas voters last month approved a measure blocking all unmarried couples from adopting or fostering children but does not specifically name gays. There is a similar law in Utah. Only Florida bars gays, single or coupled, from adopting.

Last month, Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Cindy Lederman ruled there is “no rational basis” for prohibiting gays from adopting children.

The case involved 47-year-old Martin Gill, who wished to adopt two young brothers he has cared for as foster children since 2004.

The boys had been placed with Gill after he was approached for help by a state child abuse investigator.

The placement was supposed to be temporary, but three years later, the boys and Gill had become a family, and Gill wanted to ensure the children would not be removed at some point from his care.

Gill and lawyers from the American Civil Liberties Union asked Lederman to overturn the ban on gay adoption and award him permanent custody.

An attorney appointed by Lederman to represent the children said in a report to the court that the children refer Gill and his partner as “dad” and that Gill should be granted the adoption.

The Florida Department of Children & Families and the state attorney general’s office argued the ban should be maintained. The position has the support of Gov. Charlie Crist (R) who said he has no plans to have the law repealed.

“They’re a good family,” Lederman said in her ruling. “They’re a family in every way except in the eyes of the law. These children have a right to permanency.”

“The only real permanency is adoption in the home where they are thriving,” she said. “There is no rational basis to preclude homosexuals from adopting.”

In September, another South Florida judge ruled against the law in a separate case.

The group behind the successful bid last month to constitutionally ban same-sex marriage in Florida said it would seek intervenor status in the case calling Lederman’s ruling “classic judicial activism.”


Comments (5)
  • TheRadicalRealist Said: December 8th, 2008 at 3:45 pm
    • More like “The Florida Department of Children & Families of Religious Zealots”.

  • TigerTzu Said: December 8th, 2008 at 5:44 pm
    • Sadly, Florida is probably the most homophobic and hateful state in the country. We are still struggling to come into the 20th century, never mind the 21st. Obviously the DCF is more interested in promoting their agenda of hate and bigotry than the welfare of children in its care.

  • Kris Said: December 9th, 2008 at 1:55 am
    • Well the Florida Department of Children & Families, has done such a good job in the past with adoptive children. Down here, they think that sending children to live with their “drug,alcohol,physical, emotional, verbal & sometimes “sexual” parents, have a better place instead of a loving, nuturing environment. It sickens me to be a Floridian. In this most religious, south ass backward state. If I could afford to, I would have moved from here long ago.

      This is a TRUE HATE FILLED STATE.

  • jimmy palmieri Said: December 9th, 2008 at 2:49 pm
    • please tell me something. is florida part of the united states of america? it seems as though they are a different country. i think the glbt community needs to be out loud and fighting for their rights because i see this as barbaric. wake up folks. the winds of change are blowin.

  • SteveMD2 Said: December 10th, 2008 at 12:41 am
    • “Judicial activism” - that is the same old story the bigots keep using. Isn’t judicial activism what has been the basis for most of the social progress in our nation, while religious bigotry and lust for power and dominance by victimizing some minority group has been the root of most of our social tragedies, including segregation, slavery, giving blacks the right to vote, women being second class citizens for so long, integrating our armed forces, and ending the bans on inter-racial marriage. Will these blind people ever change? Or is this a generational problem - eg despite the religious wrong’s enormous campaign, prop 8 would have been rejected if those over 65 were not allowed to vote. And if only those under eg 35 were allowed to vote, it would have been crushingly defeated.