November 7th, 2009
 

365 Gay: News

Dueling marriage bills in Penn.


(Harrisburg, Pennsylvania) Pennsylvania has become the latest same-sex marriage battleground, with the legislature being pushed to pass both a marriage equality bill and one that would bar gays from marrying.

Sen. Daylin Leach (D) announced the marriage equality bill on Wednesday.

“There has never been a more propitious time for Pennsylvania to embrace equality and enshrine the civil right of all Pennsylvanians to marry,” Leach told reporters.

The bill would provide “full and equal marriage rights to same-sex couples in Pennsylvania,” said Leach. But it would not force churches to conduct ceremonies or recognize same-sex marriages against church doctrine.

The legislation also would recognize same-sex marriages conducted in other areas where they are legal.

Earlier this month, Republican state Sen. John Eichelberger filed a bill to amend the state constitution to limit marriage to opposite-sex couples.

The state already has a so-called Defense of Marriage law limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples, but Eichelberger said the law could be overturned by a judge.  Only through a constitutional amendment could the intent of the law be carried out without “judicial interference.”

A similar proposed amendment was pulled last year, just hours before the state Senate was expected to approve it. The measure would have banned same-sex marriage and civil unions.

While it was likely to pass the Senate, the amendment was equally likely to have died in the House. An attempt to move the amendment in 2006 also failed.

Republicans control the Senate 30-20, but Democrats have a 104-99 majority in the House.

Amending the constitution requires approval from both the House and Senate in two consecutive two-year sessions before the measure goes to voters for final approval in a statewide referendum.

Last year, a poll found that although most Pennsylvanians oppose same-sex marriage, there was widespread support for civil unions. The poll, conducted by Susquehanna Polling and Research, found 65 percent of those questioned support civil unions, while only 27 percent were opposed.


Login or Register to comment.

or Login with Facebook:

  • dr. bob Said: May 27th, 2009 at 4:05 pm
    • It’s EQUAL MARRIAGE. It’s MARRIAGE EQUALITY. It’s our Civil Right and we will fight for it not to be taken away, just as anyone else would. California Judges failed to protect the Constitution and Bill Of Rights and their own authorities, giving all power to a majority vote. Dundamental Inalienable Rights are NON-VOTABLE by a simple majority. Those states that have taken rights away will be overturned. The horse is out of the barn and is free.

  • Luis (South Carolina) Said: May 27th, 2009 at 5:05 pm
    • Equal marriage is over due in this country. Take religion out of the picture. I want to have the same rights like everyone else. My Domestic Partner and I would like to have the securities and rights in case something happen to one of us. Religion should not be involved on this matter at all. Family is a family not matter what combination you want to make.

  • Morgan Said: May 27th, 2009 at 5:09 pm
    • If Californians can challenge a constitutional amendment (as they immediately working toward doing so,
      Then that means that a constitutional amendment may be a difficulty and a roadblock, but it is no longer the end of the world equality-wise.

      The push toward equality and justice will finally push the barriers to freedom aside.

  • ALAN Said: May 27th, 2009 at 7:58 pm
    • And this hatred is coming from a state that has a city nicknamed ” The City of Brotherly Love”. I would really hate to see what would happen if it was …..brotherly hate.

  • JERRY Said: May 27th, 2009 at 8:08 pm
    • I’m truly ashamed to call myself an American these days! It used to be “head west young man”, now I say go north to Canada.

  • Larry Said: May 27th, 2009 at 9:32 pm
    • my husband and I married in Massachusettes last year and live in Pennsylvania. I am kind of shocked that they would introduce this bill for marriage equality in Pennsylvania right now and i really dont think they expect to get it through but i guess it’s a start

  • Miked Said: May 28th, 2009 at 1:28 am
    • Yeah, I’m just surprised that someone introduced it. That’s a start. It has no chance of passing, but could hopefully start a good dialogue. We can’t even get HB300, an anti-discrimintation bill, passed. Democratic leadership in the House had more or less tied it up in the Appropriations committee. I guess this means they don’t have the votes for it (?) because lots of the white, old and/or Catholic, conservative Democrats don’t support it and are offering tons of amendments to it. Sigh! But, it’s a start…

  • Disgusted American Said: May 28th, 2009 at 8:26 am
    • this eichelberger guy/asshole is from the “Alabama” part of Pa. (mid-western Pa) where all the McCain/Palin supporters live….send him a message to keep his Alabama Bigotry in his own county! I did!

  • The Menstruator Said: May 28th, 2009 at 12:02 pm
    • Ugh. I hoped it wouldn’t come here. I don’t want to have to marry my girlfriend for health benefits, we have them now. If the law changes we’ll have to marry. We will of course get a sweet ass tax break though. Secret ceremony, I guess. I really just don’t believe in marriage in general. But for those that want to ruin their lives with marriage, how nice for you and my continued support.

 
Login

Register
Lost your password?


or Login with Facebook