<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DHS preparing to ease ban on HIV+ immigration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.365gay.com/news/dhs-preparing-to-ease-ban-on-hiv-immigration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/dhs-preparing-to-ease-ban-on-hiv-immigration/</link>
	<description>The daily news source for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:50:21 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JohnM</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/dhs-preparing-to-ease-ban-on-hiv-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-22914</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3482#comment-22914</guid>
		<description>Also, see the Amfar article on the reason why President Clinton did not veto the reauthorizing legislation at: www.amfar.org/cgi-bin/iowa/programs/publicp/z.record.html?record=174 - 34k - 

In brief, a key paragraph of the article reads:

During his presidential campaign, Clinton promised to repeal the ban on HIV-infected immigrants. However, because the 1993 measure was attached to the NIH Reauthorization Act, which included key provisions supporting AIDS, cancer, women’s health, and other medical research, repealing the ban proved difficult, and AIDS advocates did not push for a veto.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, see the Amfar article on the reason why President Clinton did not veto the reauthorizing legislation at: <a href="http://www.amfar.org/cgi-bin/iowa/programs/publicp/z.record.html?record=174" rel="nofollow">http://www.amfar.org/cgi-bin/iowa/programs/publicp/z.record.html?record=174</a> &#8211; 34k &#8211; </p>
<p>In brief, a key paragraph of the article reads:</p>
<p>During his presidential campaign, Clinton promised to repeal the ban on HIV-infected immigrants. However, because the 1993 measure was attached to the NIH Reauthorization Act, which included key provisions supporting AIDS, cancer, women’s health, and other medical research, repealing the ban proved difficult, and AIDS advocates did not push for a veto.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnM</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/dhs-preparing-to-ease-ban-on-hiv-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-22911</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3482#comment-22911</guid>
		<description>I agree Trace, this was very shortsighted policy and Clinton should have vetoed the bill.  However, while President Clinton and his administration were talking about the need for treating HIV+ people with dignity and respect, and backing that up with huge funding increases for HIV/AIDS research and prevention, the Congressional Republicans were excoriating us.  The following is a quote from Bob Dornan, a Republican Congressman from Orange County, when the HIV immigration reforms were being debated in Congress:

&quot;What we&#039;re talking about is letting people come into this country in their young years -- what liberals call raging hormones, sexually active years (look at the profile of Haitians) with a communicable, venereal disease that is always fatal. I&#039;m not just isolating this disease or isolating Haitians; if they were all little redheads....&quot;

Some Congressional Republicans wanted to seriously debate the merits of  quarantining our HIV+ brothers and sisters.  Remember that.  It was a different time.

The Clinton Administration advocated for the biggest funding increases in history for HIV prevention and research.  This was the first time a US President provided bold leadership on this issue, when we had the Bob Dornans and Bob Dannemeyers (remember them) being the hateful mouthpieces for the powerful Republican Congressional delegation.  

They were both blasting Clinton for the HIV funding increases by saying the money should have been spent on research for cancer treatments or heart disease prevention.  They were clearly saying that our lives were expendable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Trace, this was very shortsighted policy and Clinton should have vetoed the bill.  However, while President Clinton and his administration were talking about the need for treating HIV+ people with dignity and respect, and backing that up with huge funding increases for HIV/AIDS research and prevention, the Congressional Republicans were excoriating us.  The following is a quote from Bob Dornan, a Republican Congressman from Orange County, when the HIV immigration reforms were being debated in Congress:</p>
<p>&#8220;What we&#8217;re talking about is letting people come into this country in their young years &#8212; what liberals call raging hormones, sexually active years (look at the profile of Haitians) with a communicable, venereal disease that is always fatal. I&#8217;m not just isolating this disease or isolating Haitians; if they were all little redheads&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
<p>Some Congressional Republicans wanted to seriously debate the merits of  quarantining our HIV+ brothers and sisters.  Remember that.  It was a different time.</p>
<p>The Clinton Administration advocated for the biggest funding increases in history for HIV prevention and research.  This was the first time a US President provided bold leadership on this issue, when we had the Bob Dornans and Bob Dannemeyers (remember them) being the hateful mouthpieces for the powerful Republican Congressional delegation.  </p>
<p>They were both blasting Clinton for the HIV funding increases by saying the money should have been spent on research for cancer treatments or heart disease prevention.  They were clearly saying that our lives were expendable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trace</title>
		<link>http://www.365gay.com/news/dhs-preparing-to-ease-ban-on-hiv-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-22907</link>
		<dc:creator>Trace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 23:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.365gay.com/?p=3482#comment-22907</guid>
		<description>You mean the law was restated in 1993?

Hmmmm, something I did not remember.  

Now who was the President in 1993?  Was it that President that gave us Don&#039;t Ask Don&#039;t Tell?  Was it that President that signed DOMA? 

Why Yes!  One in the same.  Gosh the Democrats are awfully friendly to them gay folk and their issues!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean the law was restated in 1993?</p>
<p>Hmmmm, something I did not remember.  </p>
<p>Now who was the President in 1993?  Was it that President that gave us Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell?  Was it that President that signed DOMA? </p>
<p>Why Yes!  One in the same.  Gosh the Democrats are awfully friendly to them gay folk and their issues!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
