Comments on: Country’s first legal gigolo starts work in Nevada

By: Sarrellec

Sarrellec — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:16:54 +0000

We’re really supposed to believe that Nevada, among all states in the Union, does NOT have male for male brothels?
Puh-leeeeez….
I’m not in Nevada yet, but I’ll bet within 10 hours of arriving there, if I so choose, I could be walking into a pay-for-play man-house.

By: DaveW

DaveW — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:33:15 +0000

I know, it is Nevada and the sex industry…but how sexist can these people be???? You can’t thoroughly inspect female clients? So, you can “see” HIV when it walks in the door on a man but not a woman?

And all the naysayers basically claiming: women won’t do this, they are not pigs like men.

I also wonder if the female workers take either sex as clients.

Sad, that in an industry where you would think all inhibitions are thrown aside, we see this level of sexism.

But, I’m just laughing at the competitor who says male and female clients should be kept separate. Just think about it…the “in the lobby discount” could be going on…like the 5 finger discount!

By: Morgan

Morgan — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:30:36 +0000

I guess a certain titillation factor is at work here. Hope 365gay.com doesn’t become a supermarket type tabloid so to speak, rather that a news source.

By: bobweekend

bobweekend — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:15:27 +0000

All a woman needs to do is clean out and she is ready for the next guy.
I don’t care how much Viagra this guy takes I doubt he will be able to keep up with his job after the 3rd or 4th client in a row.

If he can only handle 2-3 clients a day then that is a bad investment and use of space when a woman could handle 8 or 9.

Unless he gets one of those inflatable implants this is doomed to fail.

By: John Kozlik

John Kozlik — Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:10:53 +0000

Does the gay community really care if some prostitute doesn’t want male clients? Come on 365gay….